Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Examiner: UTT, ETHAN A

Tech Center 1700 • Art Units: 1712 1783

This examiner grants 48% of resolved cases

Analysis

Ethan A. Utt is an examiner in Tech Center 1700 and Art Unit 1712, where he has handled 383 resolved cases. His allowance rate is 47.8%, which suggests a challenging examination process for applicants. This 47.8% rate serves as a baseline for assessing the likelihood of a grant in this specific art unit. The 383 cases resolved by this examiner offer a reliable sample size for these performance metrics.

A critical data point for this examiner is the interview lift of 41.2%, which is exceptionally high. This figure indicates that conducting an interview is a highly effective strategy for moving an application toward allowance. Furthermore, the median days to allowance is 1272, suggesting a relatively long prosecution cycle. The high 41.2% lift suggests that the time spent in an interview can be a pivotal investment in overcoming the challenges that contribute to the 1272-day median pendency.

Practitioners should prioritize scheduling interviews early in the process given the 41.2% lift observed across 383 cases. While the 47.8% allowance rate indicates a rigorous review, the significant impact of verbal communication cannot be overlooked. The 1272-day median to allowance should be factored into the overall strategy, with the understanding that direct dialogue is a primary driver of success. This profile highlights the importance of active engagement in Tech Center 1700.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

47.8%
Allow Rate
-17.2% vs TC avg
410
Total Applications
+41.2%
Interview Lift
1272
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 383 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

0.3%
§101 Eligibility
14.7%
§102 Novelty
53.6%
§103 Obviousness
24.3%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18237545 GLASS ARTICLE AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME Non-Final OA Samsung Display Co., LTD.
18449869 Thresholds for Flooring in an Aircraft Non-Final OA The Boeing Company
19068678 PRE-SINTERED MULTI-LAYERED DENTAL MILL BLANK, PROCESS FOR PREPARING THE SAME, AND USES THEREOF, AND A SINTERING PROCESS Non-Final OA Ivoclar Vivadent AG
18034879 ALUMINOUS SINTERED PRODUCT Non-Final OA SAINT-GOBAIN CENTRE DE RECHERCHES ET D'ETUDES EUROPEEN
18388332 Features for Window Unit for Reducing Bird Collisions Non-Final OA Vitro Flat Glass LLC
18853796 MULTILAYERED FILM Non-Final OA BOREALIS AG
18086898 SEAM TAPE, COMPONENT MATERIAL, AND ACCESSORY MATERIAL WITH EPOXY ADHESIVE FOR INFLATABLE SAFETY PRODUCTS Non-Final OA Air Cruisers Company, LLC
18151709 COATING FABRICATION METHOD FOR PRODUCING ENGINEERED MICROSTRUCTURE OF SILICATE-RESISTANT BARRIER COATING Non-Final OA RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month