Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

A.C. Entis-Ip Ltd.

Technology areas: Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 5 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

A.C. Entis-IP Ltd. practices in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and has 5 pending office actions. Its career record contains 380 applications, giving context for the reported prosecution outcomes.

The resolved allowance rate is 90.11%, and applications reaching allowance have averaged 4.14 office actions. The data indicates a favorable resolved outcome record, with allowed matters typically requiring several examination exchanges before reaching allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=380 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

90.1%
Allowance Rate
n=380
+0.67σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=380
4.1
OAs to Allowance
n=237
+0.32σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=237
1035 days
Time to Allowance
n=237
+8.0pp
Interview Lift
n=380
29.7%
RCE Rate
n=380
2.2%
Appeal Rate
n=380

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

82.9%
§101 Overcome
n=41
86.1%
§102 Overcome
n=115
87.4%
§103 Overcome
n=198
88.6%
§112 Overcome
n=132

Specialization & Scale

H04L, G06F, C30B
Top CPC Subclasses
20%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=380
0
Practitioners
n=380
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=380 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (80%)
1
Medium (20%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (20%)
§103 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
20% of docket
1
Semiconductors
20% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES 1 73.8% +29.9%
KIDWELL, MICHELE M 1 63.9% +18.8%
SPOONER, LAMONT M 1 73.7% +11.9%
WASAFF, JOHN S. 1 33.8% +44.0%
KAO, SOPHIA WEI-CHUN 1 96.2% +4.9%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18457362 LOW ON-RESISTANCE HIGH POWER SWITCH KAO, SOPHIA WEI-CHUN —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19470048 DEVICE FOR FIXING A CRANIAL FLAP TO THE CRANIAL VAULT TO BE POSITIONED IN THE CRANIOTOMY HOLE LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES —
19104372 VACUUM PUMP KIDWELL, MICHELE M —
18878925 INTENTION READER SPOONER, LAMONT M —
18865363 TRADE FINANCE DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT WASAFF, JOHN S. —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19470048 DEVICE FOR FIXING A CRANIAL FLAP TO THE CRANIAL VAULT TO BE POSITIONED IN THE CRANIOTOMY HOLE LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES —
19104372 VACUUM PUMP KIDWELL, MICHELE M —
18878925 INTENTION READER SPOONER, LAMONT M —
18865363 TRADE FINANCE DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT WASAFF, JOHN S. —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36191
37811
26571
36291
28171

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19470048 DEVICE FOR FIXING A CRANIAL FLAP TO THE CRANIAL VAULT TO BE POSITIONED IN THE CRANIOTOMY HOLE Ntplast S.r.l. LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES 3619 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 28, 2025
19104372 VACUUM PUMP Clinton Frederic Shahim KIDWELL, MICHELE M 3781 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 18, 2025
18878925 INTENTION READER Gainsight, Inc. SPOONER, LAMONT M 2657 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 26, 2024
18865363 TRADE FINANCE DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT Surecomp Development Ltd. WASAFF, JOHN S. 3629 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 13, 2024
18457362 LOW ON-RESISTANCE HIGH POWER SWITCH VISIC TECHNOLOGIES LTD. KAO, SOPHIA WEI-CHUN 2817 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 29, 2023

Managing A.C. Entis-Ip Ltd.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is A.C. Entis-Ip Ltd.'s patent allowance rate?

90.1% of resolved applications prosecuted by A.C. Entis-Ip Ltd. were allowed, across 380 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does A.C. Entis-Ip Ltd. average before allowance?

4.14 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does A.C. Entis-Ip Ltd. have?

5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 5 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month