Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Alg Intellectual Property | Isrg

Technology areas: Communications • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

20 pending office actions • 1 client • 20 examiners • 16 art units • 0 of 20 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 27 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

ALG Intellectual Property | ISRG has 19 pending office actions in Communications and a career total of 1978 applications. The active workload is recorded against a substantial application history, allowing current prosecution activity to be viewed alongside broader firm experience.

The resolved allowance rate is 91.82%, while the average office actions per allowance is 3.43. These figures indicate that resolved applications have commonly reached allowance after several office-action cycles. The pattern is relevant to response planning, particularly where communications claims require careful treatment of technical relationships and functional limitations.

The data supports a portfolio-level view of workload and historical outcomes, but it does not identify the technologies, examiners, or claim amendments associated with individual results. Matter-level review remains necessary for estimating the work required in a particular communications application.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1978 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

91.8%
Allowance Rate
n=1978
+0.58σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1978
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=1392
+0.02σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1392
1006 days
Time to Allowance
n=1392
-6.8pp
Interview Lift
n=1978
31.1%
RCE Rate
n=1978
0.8%
Appeal Rate
n=1978

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

70.8%
§101 Overcome
n=199
86.1%
§102 Overcome
n=661
83.8%
§103 Overcome
n=1028
82.2%
§112 Overcome
n=432

Specialization & Scale

H04N, G03B, G02F
Top CPC Subclasses
28%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1978
6
Practitioners
n=1978
329.7
Apps / Practitioner
n=1978

Portfolio Summary

20
Total Pending OAs
13
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (40%)
11
Medium (55%)
1
Easy (5%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other4 (20%)
§103 only10 (50%)
§102 only1 (5%)
Double-patenting only1 (5%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
5% of docket
2
Information Tech
10% of docket
7
Communications
35% of docket
1
Semiconductors
5% of docket
9
Mechanical / Eng
45% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

200 h
Manual time on pending OAs
40 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
70 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ELSHAER, ALAAELDIN M 1 35.7% +29.8%
MALDONADO, STEVEN 1 26.9% +42.9%
WALKER, JARED T 1 84.7% +9.8%
PARK, PATRICIA JOO YOUNG 1 57.9% +14.7%
KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE 1 27.0% +31.7%
WANG, YI 1 77.4% +14.2%
ADAMS, EILEEN M 1 86.3% +4.1%
GRAY, RYAN M 1 87.8% +11.8%
PENG, BO JOSEPH 1 69.5% +13.6%
LAU, MICHAEL J 1 72.3% +23.2%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19353158 AUTO-EXPOSURE MANAGEMENT OF MULTI-COMPONENT IMAGES WALKER, JARED T —
19104576 DETERMINATION OF A CONTOUR PHYSICAL DISTANCE WITHIN A SUBJECT BASED ON A DEFORMABLE THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODEL GRAY, RYAN M —

Hard Cases (8)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19229753 Untitled ELSHAER, ALAAELDIN M —
19440445 WAVEBAND-SELECTIVE IMAGING SYSTEMS AND METHODS MALDONADO, STEVEN —
19196395 OPERATION PROFILE SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A COMPUTER-ASSISTED SURGICAL SYSTEM KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE —
19073796 APPARATUSES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR MANAGING AUTO-EXPOSURE OF IMAGE FRAMES DEPICTING COLOR-BIASED CONTENT ADAMS, EILEEN M —
18874382 NON-VISIBLE-SPECTRUM LIGHT IMAGE-BASED OPERATIONS FOR VISIBLE-SPECTRUM IMAGES NAKHJAVAN, SHERVIN K —
18924370 COMPACT STEREOSCOPIC IMAGE CAPTURE UNIT CRUM, JACOB R —
18186493 ENHANCING VISIBLE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DIFFERENT TISSUES IN COMPUTER-ASSISTED TELE-OPERATED SURGERY KOROMA, SORIE IBRAHIM —
17785265 SYSTEMS FOR FACILITATING GUIDED TELEOPERATION OF A NON-ROBOTIC DEVICE IN A SURGICAL SPACE SCHMITT, BENJAMIN ALLYN —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19229753 Untitled ELSHAER, ALAAELDIN M —
19440445 WAVEBAND-SELECTIVE IMAGING SYSTEMS AND METHODS MALDONADO, STEVEN —
19255709 SYSTEMS AND A METHOD FOR DIRECTING AN IMAGING DEVICE TO DETECT FLOURESCENCE AND FOR DETERMINING A LIFETIME OF THE FLOURESCENCE PARK, PATRICIA JOO YOUNG —
19196395 OPERATION PROFILE SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A COMPUTER-ASSISTED SURGICAL SYSTEM KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE —
19098396 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MASKING A RECOGNIZED OBJECT DURING AN APPLICATION OF A SYNTHETIC ELEMENT TO AN ORIGINAL IMAGE WANG, YI —
19104576 DETERMINATION OF A CONTOUR PHYSICAL DISTANCE WITHIN A SUBJECT BASED ON A DEFORMABLE THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODEL GRAY, RYAN M —
19025746 ILLUMINATION CORRECTED NEAR-INFRARED (NIR) IMAGING FOR IMAGE GUIDED SURGERY PENG, BO JOSEPH —
19015301 CAMERA CONTROL SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A COMPUTER-ASSISTED SURGICAL SYSTEM LAU, MICHAEL J —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC. 20

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37963
36872
37972
24261
37931
26191
24811
26111
26331
26721

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19229753 Untitled Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. ELSHAER, ALAAELDIN M 3687 §101§102 Final Rejection — Pending
19440445 WAVEBAND-SELECTIVE IMAGING SYSTEMS AND METHODS Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. MALDONADO, STEVEN 3797 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 05, 2026
19353158 AUTO-EXPOSURE MANAGEMENT OF MULTI-COMPONENT IMAGES Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. WALKER, JARED T 2426 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 08, 2025
19255709 SYSTEMS AND A METHOD FOR DIRECTING AN IMAGING DEVICE TO DETECT FLOURESCENCE AND FOR DETERMINING A LIFETIME OF THE FLOURESCENCE Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. PARK, PATRICIA JOO YOUNG 3793 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 30, 2025
19196395 OPERATION PROFILE SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A COMPUTER-ASSISTED SURGICAL SYSTEM Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. KOLOSOWSKI-GAGER, KATHERINE 3687 §101DP Non-Final OA — Pending May 01, 2025
19098396 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MASKING A RECOGNIZED OBJECT DURING AN APPLICATION OF A SYNTHETIC ELEMENT TO AN ORIGINAL IMAGE Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. WANG, YI 2619 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 02, 2025
19073796 APPARATUSES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR MANAGING AUTO-EXPOSURE OF IMAGE FRAMES DEPICTING COLOR-BIASED CONTENT Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. ADAMS, EILEEN M 2481 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 07, 2025
19104576 DETERMINATION OF A CONTOUR PHYSICAL DISTANCE WITHIN A SUBJECT BASED ON A DEFORMABLE THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODEL Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. GRAY, RYAN M 2611 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 18, 2025
19025746 ILLUMINATION CORRECTED NEAR-INFRARED (NIR) IMAGING FOR IMAGE GUIDED SURGERY Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. PENG, BO JOSEPH 3797 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 16, 2025
19015301 CAMERA CONTROL SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A COMPUTER-ASSISTED SURGICAL SYSTEM Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. LAU, MICHAEL J 3796 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 09, 2025
18986240 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING OPTIMIZATION OF AN IMAGING DEVICE VIEWPOINT DURING AN OPERATING SESSION OF A COMPUTER-ASSISTED OPERATION SYSTEM Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. HAIDER, SYED 2633 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 18, 2024
18874382 NON-VISIBLE-SPECTRUM LIGHT IMAGE-BASED OPERATIONS FOR VISIBLE-SPECTRUM IMAGES Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. NAKHJAVAN, SHERVIN K 2672 §101§102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 12, 2024
18974172 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING A VOLUME OF RESECTED TISSUE DURING A SURGICAL PROCEDURE Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. LEE, JOHN J 2649 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 09, 2024
18924370 COMPACT STEREOSCOPIC IMAGE CAPTURE UNIT Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. CRUM, JACOB R 2835 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 23, 2024
18911077 CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY FOR A SURGICAL INSTRUMENT AND A CORRESPONDING RECEIVER ASSEMBLY Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. BOICE, JAMES EDWARD 3795 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 09, 2024
18851598 Surgical Accessory Element-Based Setup of a Robotic System Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. SAHAND, SANA 3796 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 26, 2024
18704649 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING MATERIAL PROPERTY VALUES FOR A THREE-DIMENSIONAL VIRTUAL MODEL OF AN ANATOMICAL OBJECT Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. PRINGLE-PARKER, JASON A 2617 §103 Final Rejection 21d Pending Apr 25, 2024
18266770 FLUORESCENCE EVALUATION APPARATUSES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. ALABI, OYELEYE A 1797 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 12, 2023
18186493 ENHANCING VISIBLE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DIFFERENT TISSUES IN COMPUTER-ASSISTED TELE-OPERATED SURGERY Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. KOROMA, SORIE IBRAHIM 2662 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 20, 2023
17785265 SYSTEMS FOR FACILITATING GUIDED TELEOPERATION OF A NON-ROBOTIC DEVICE IN A SURGICAL SPACE Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. SCHMITT, BENJAMIN ALLYN 3796 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 14, 2022

Managing Alg Intellectual Property | Isrg's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Alg Intellectual Property | Isrg's patent allowance rate?

91.8% of resolved applications prosecuted by Alg Intellectual Property | Isrg were allowed, across 1,978 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Alg Intellectual Property | Isrg average before allowance?

3.43 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Alg Intellectual Property | Isrg have?

20 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 1 client, before 20 examiners in 16 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month