Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Anderson Gorecki LLP

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 6 clients • 8 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Anderson Gorecki LLP has 8 pending office actions in Networking & Security and 1,545 career applications. Its resolved allowance rate is 90.13%, with an average of 4.2 office actions per allowance. The profile pairs a limited current docket with a meaningful application base and a higher response count per allowance.

The allowance rate describes the reported prosecution outcome, while the office-action average signals that matters reaching allowance may require repeated examination interactions. For practitioners, this supports examining how network and security claims are amended over successive responses. The pending matters can show whether current cases follow the same prosecution pattern reflected in the historical figures.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1545 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

90.1%
Allowance Rate
n=1545
+0.51σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1545
4.2
OAs to Allowance
n=1151
+0.40σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1151
1243 days
Time to Allowance
n=1151
+7.1pp
Interview Lift
n=1545
33.3%
RCE Rate
n=1545
6.7%
Appeal Rate
n=1545

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

91.3%
§101 Overcome
n=230
87.4%
§102 Overcome
n=421
89.3%
§103 Overcome
n=720
91.0%
§112 Overcome
n=376

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, H04W
Top CPC Subclasses
54%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1545
2
Practitioners
n=1545
772.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=1545

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (62%)
2
Medium (25%)
1
Easy (12%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (12%)
§103 only2 (25%)
§112 only1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
5
Information Tech
62% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
38% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HO, DAO Q 1 83.1% +32.1%
TRAORE, FATOUMATA 1 78.2% +35.4%
TRAN, ALEX HOANG 1 62.7% +28.7%
LEWIS, JUSTIN V 1 55.4% +17.6%
SWIFT, CHARLES M 1 80.6% +22.7%
LAUGHLIN, ELIZABETH ANN 1 59.3% +57.6%
STEPHENS, MATTHEW 1 65.1% +21.6%
GODO, MORIAM MOSUNMOLA 1 44.6% +37.0%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19095703 Efficient Hardware Resource Utilization for 802.1X Authentication HO, DAO Q —
18412789 Effective Monolith Development Using Microservices SWIFT, CHARLES M —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17919292 A GRINDING MILL ROTOR STEPHENS, MATTHEW 133d overdue
19072282 Selective and Transparent User Data Encryption in Network Devices TRAORE, FATOUMATA —
19012031 IMPACT DETECTION LABEL FOR SPORTS TRAINING LEWIS, JUSTIN V —
18567422 Ventilation and Air Treating Devices LAUGHLIN, ELIZABETH ANN —
17422288 System and Method for Automated Material Take-Off GODO, MORIAM MOSUNMOLA —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17919292 A GRINDING MILL ROTOR STEPHENS, MATTHEW 133d overdue
19095703 Efficient Hardware Resource Utilization for 802.1X Authentication HO, DAO Q —
19072282 Selective and Transparent User Data Encryption in Network Devices TRAORE, FATOUMATA —
19061099 Cost-Based Selection of Cross-Field Summarization Labels TRAN, ALEX HOANG —
19012031 IMPACT DETECTION LABEL FOR SPORTS TRAINING LEWIS, JUSTIN V —
18412789 Effective Monolith Development Using Microservices SWIFT, CHARLES M —
18567422 Ventilation and Air Treating Devices LAUGHLIN, ELIZABETH ANN —
17422288 System and Method for Automated Material Take-Off GODO, MORIAM MOSUNMOLA —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24321
24361
24531
36371
21961
37621
37251
21481

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19095703 Efficient Hardware Resource Utilization for 802.1X Authentication Arista Networks, Inc. HO, DAO Q 2432 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 31, 2025
19072282 Selective and Transparent User Data Encryption in Network Devices Arista Networks, Inc. TRAORE, FATOUMATA 2436 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 06, 2025
19061099 Cost-Based Selection of Cross-Field Summarization Labels Arista Networks, Inc. TRAN, ALEX HOANG 2453 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 24, 2025
19012031 IMPACT DETECTION LABEL FOR SPORTS TRAINING Brian Carr LEWIS, JUSTIN V 3637 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 07, 2025
18412789 Effective Monolith Development Using Microservices DELL PRODUCTS, L.P. SWIFT, CHARLES M 2196 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 15, 2024
18567422 Ventilation and Air Treating Devices Synergetics Pty. Ltd. LAUGHLIN, ELIZABETH ANN 3762 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2023
17919292 A GRINDING MILL ROTOR VECTIS PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR JJB TRUST STEPHENS, MATTHEW 3725 §103§112 Non-Final OA 133d overdue Pending Oct 17, 2022
17422288 System and Method for Automated Material Take-Off Matrak Shield Pty. Ltd. GODO, MORIAM MOSUNMOLA 2148 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 12, 2021

Managing Anderson Gorecki LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Anderson Gorecki LLP's patent allowance rate?

90.1% of resolved applications prosecuted by Anderson Gorecki LLP were allowed, across 1,545 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Anderson Gorecki LLP average before allowance?

4.20 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Anderson Gorecki LLP have?

8 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 8 examiners in 8 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month