Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Anderson Gorecki LLP

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

10 pending office actions • 7 clients • 10 examiners • 10 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Anderson Gorecki LLP operates in the Networking & Security technology area, with 1543 career applications. This volume of work shows a solid foundation of experience in networking patent prosecution. The firm currently manages 8 pending office actions, indicating a focused active docket.

The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate pct of 90.12, reflecting a high probability of success for its clients. However, the prosecution process tends to be more intensive, with an avg office actions per allowance of 4.2. This suggests that the firm is willing to engage in extensive negotiations and several rounds of amendments to secure an allowance.

For practitioners, the 90.12 resolved allowance rate pct is a strong indicator of the firm's ultimate success. The 4.2 avg office actions per allowance highlights the persistence required in the Networking & Security sector. With 1543 career applications and 8 pending office actions, the firm has a proven track record of overcoming examiner rejections through diligent prosecution.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1543 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

90.1%
Allowance Rate
n=1543
+0.51σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1543
4.2
OAs to Allowance
n=1149
+0.41σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1149
1244 days
Time to Allowance
n=1149
+7.1pp
Interview Lift
n=1543
33.2%
RCE Rate
n=1543
6.7%
Appeal Rate
n=1543

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

91.3%
§101 Overcome
n=230
87.2%
§102 Overcome
n=421
89.2%
§103 Overcome
n=719
90.4%
§112 Overcome
n=376

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, H04W
Top CPC Subclasses
54%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1543
2
Practitioners
n=1543
771.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=1543

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (50%)
5
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (10%)
§103 only4 (40%)
Double-patenting + other1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
6
Information Tech
60% of docket
1
Communications
10% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
30% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TRAORE, FATOUMATA 1 78.2% +35.4%
LEWIS, JUSTIN V 1 55.3% +17.6%
LITTLE, VANCE M 1 83.9% +24.4%
CHAVEZ, RODRIGO A 1 52.5% +38.0%
POWERS, WILLIAM S 1 79.7% +2.4%
NIGATU, BEZA DIRESSA 1 — —
SWIFT, CHARLES M 1 80.7% +22.6%
LAUGHLIN, ELIZABETH ANN 1 57.1% +56.9%
STEPHENS, MATTHEW 1 65.5% +22.6%
GODO, MORIAM MOSUNMOLA 1 45.0% +37.4%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18938636 Masking Sensitive Information While Screensharing HTML Elements LITTLE, VANCE M 16d overdue
18412789 Effective Monolith Development Using Microservices SWIFT, CHARLES M —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17919292 A GRINDING MILL ROTOR STEPHENS, MATTHEW 133d overdue
19072282 Selective and Transparent User Data Encryption in Network Devices TRAORE, FATOUMATA —
19012031 IMPACT DETECTION LABEL FOR SPORTS TRAINING LEWIS, JUSTIN V —
18567422 Ventilation and Air Treating Devices LAUGHLIN, ELIZABETH ANN —
17422288 System and Method for Automated Material Take-Off GODO, MORIAM MOSUNMOLA —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17919292 A GRINDING MILL ROTOR STEPHENS, MATTHEW 133d overdue
18938636 Masking Sensitive Information While Screensharing HTML Elements LITTLE, VANCE M 16d overdue
19072282 Selective and Transparent User Data Encryption in Network Devices TRAORE, FATOUMATA —
19012031 IMPACT DETECTION LABEL FOR SPORTS TRAINING LEWIS, JUSTIN V —
18919550 Automatic Mojibake Correction in a Storage System Management Application CHAVEZ, RODRIGO A —
18412789 Effective Monolith Development Using Microservices SWIFT, CHARLES M —
18567422 Ventilation and Air Treating Devices LAUGHLIN, ELIZABETH ANN —
17422288 System and Method for Automated Material Take-Off GODO, MORIAM MOSUNMOLA —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24361
36371
24941
26581
24961
21921
21961
37621
37251
21481

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19072282 Selective and Transparent User Data Encryption in Network Devices Arista Networks, Inc. TRAORE, FATOUMATA 2436 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 06, 2025
19012031 IMPACT DETECTION LABEL FOR SPORTS TRAINING Brian Carr LEWIS, JUSTIN V 3637 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 07, 2025
18938636 Masking Sensitive Information While Screensharing HTML Elements Glance Networks, Inc. LITTLE, VANCE M 2494 §102§103DP Final Rejection 16d overdue Pending Nov 06, 2024
18919550 Automatic Mojibake Correction in a Storage System Management Application DELL PRODUCTS, L.P. CHAVEZ, RODRIGO A 2658 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 18, 2024
18908925 Privacy Enabled Logging of User Data DELL PRODUCTS, L.P. POWERS, WILLIAM S 2496 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 08, 2024
18610337 NON-DISRUPTIVE NIC FIRMWARE UPGRADE IN MULTI-HOST ENVIRONMENT DELL PRODUCTS, L.P. NIGATU, BEZA DIRESSA 2192 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 20, 2024
18412789 Effective Monolith Development Using Microservices DELL PRODUCTS, L.P. SWIFT, CHARLES M 2196 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 15, 2024
18567422 Ventilation and Air Treating Devices Synergetics Pty. Ltd. LAUGHLIN, ELIZABETH ANN 3762 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2023
17919292 A GRINDING MILL ROTOR VECTIS PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR JJB TRUST STEPHENS, MATTHEW 3725 §103§112 Non-Final OA 133d overdue Pending Oct 17, 2022
17422288 System and Method for Automated Material Take-Off Matrak Shield Pty. Ltd. GODO, MORIAM MOSUNMOLA 2148 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 12, 2021

Managing Anderson Gorecki LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month