Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Antoinette G Giugliano Pc

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

7 pending office actions • 3 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Antoinette G Giugliano PC focuses on the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area, where it has handled 320 career applications. This focused practice size indicates specialized expertise in life sciences patent prosecution. The firm currently has 5 pending office actions under its management, showing a dedicated focus on its current docket.

The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate pct of 82.22, showing a strong ability to secure patent grants in a complex field. Prosecution efficiency is reflected in the 2.72 avg office actions per allowance. This figure suggests that the firm typically reaches an allowance in several substantive interactions with the examiner, which is efficient for biotechnology matters.

For clients in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector, the 82.22 resolved allowance rate pct offers a solid degree of confidence. The 2.72 avg office actions per allowance indicates a prosecution process that is both effective and relatively streamlined. With 320 career applications and 5 pending office actions, the firm demonstrates a consistent track record of success in the life sciences.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=320 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

82.2%
Allowance Rate
n=320
+0.71σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=320
2.7
OAs to Allowance
n=185
-0.42σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=185
935 days
Time to Allowance
n=185
+15.4pp
Interview Lift
n=320
26.7%
RCE Rate
n=320
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=320

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=18 (min 20)
78.7%
§102 Overcome
n=61
77.2%
§103 Overcome
n=101
78.0%
§112 Overcome
n=123

Specialization & Scale

A61K, F26B, C12N
Top CPC Subclasses
31%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=320
1
Practitioners
n=320
320.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=320

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (29%)
3
Medium (43%)
2
Easy (29%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (29%)
§102 only1 (14%)
§112 only1 (14%)
Double-patenting only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
57% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
29% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KOSAR, AARON J 2 71.2% +29.9%
LAU, JASON 1 53.7% +15.6%
VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JAGAMYA NMN 1 62.5% +49.3%
PILCHER, JONATHAN L 1 64.3% +44.0%
MARTIN, PAUL C 1 41.8% +21.6%
GUINO-O UZZLE, MARITES A 1 68.9% +16.6%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17779213 METHODS FOR PRODUCING CEMENT COMPRISING A SUPPLEMENTARY CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL, AND CEMENT OBTAINABLE THEREBY GUINO-O UZZLE, MARITES A 120d overdue
18467089 Blood Plasma Product VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JAGAMYA NMN 26d

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17779213 METHODS FOR PRODUCING CEMENT COMPRISING A SUPPLEMENTARY CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL, AND CEMENT OBTAINABLE THEREBY GUINO-O UZZLE, MARITES A 120d overdue
18791873 Alignment of A Disposable For A Spray Drying Plasma System LAU, JASON 43d overdue
17945126 Pretreatment Of Plasma For Spray Drying And Storage MARTIN, PAUL C 32d overdue
18467074 Pretreatment Of Plasma For Spray Drying And Storage PILCHER, JONATHAN L 16d
18467089 Blood Plasma Product VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JAGAMYA NMN 26d
18745283 Formulations And Methods For Contemporaneous Stabilization Of Active Proteins During Spray Drying And Storage KOSAR, AARON J —
18406981 Process For Purification of Chemical Components From Plant Matter KOSAR, AARON J —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Velico Medical, Inc. 5
Kb Crash Creations LLC 1
Cemgreen APS 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37621
36531
16331
17721
16531
17311

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18791873 Alignment of A Disposable For A Spray Drying Plasma System Velico Medical, Inc. LAU, JASON 3762 §102Other Final Rejection 43d overdue Pending Aug 01, 2024
18745283 Formulations And Methods For Contemporaneous Stabilization Of Active Proteins During Spray Drying And Storage Velico Medical, Inc. KOSAR, AARON J DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 17, 2024
18406981 Process For Purification of Chemical Components From Plant Matter Kb Crash Creations LLC KOSAR, AARON J 3653 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 08, 2024
18467089 Blood Plasma Product Velico Medical, Inc. VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JAGAMYA NMN 1633 §103§112Other Final Rejection 26d Pending Sep 14, 2023
18467074 Pretreatment Of Plasma For Spray Drying And Storage Velico Medical, Inc. PILCHER, JONATHAN L 1772 §103 Final Rejection 16d Pending Sep 14, 2023
17945126 Pretreatment Of Plasma For Spray Drying And Storage Velico Medical, Inc. MARTIN, PAUL C 1653 §103 Final Rejection 32d overdue Pending Sep 15, 2022
17779213 METHODS FOR PRODUCING CEMENT COMPRISING A SUPPLEMENTARY CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL, AND CEMENT OBTAINABLE THEREBY Cemgreen Aps GUINO-O UZZLE, MARITES A 1731 §103§112 Non-Final OA 120d overdue Pending May 24, 2022

Managing Antoinette G Giugliano Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month