Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

18 pending office actions • 15 clients • 18 examiners • 14 art units • 0 of 18 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP has 18 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and 410 career applications. Its resolved allowance rate is 89.42%, while the average is 3.85 office actions per allowance. The record therefore combines a modest active docket with a high resolved allowance result and several examination events typically associated with each allowed application.

These measures provide a useful starting point for prosecution planning. The application figure gives context for the historical outcome data, while the pending-action figure identifies current work requiring attention. The allowance rate applies to resolved applications and does not determine the outcome of pending matters. The action average can inform budgeting and staffing, but it does not explain whether effort is concentrated in mechanical claim construction, obviousness disputes, or e-commerce implementation issues. File-level review is needed before applying the profile to a specific case.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=410 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

89.4%
Allowance Rate
n=410
+0.73σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=410
3.8
OAs to Allowance
n=262
-0.05σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=262
871 days
Time to Allowance
n=262
+12.6pp
Interview Lift
n=410
40.3%
RCE Rate
n=410
0.9%
Appeal Rate
n=410

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

61.5%
§101 Overcome
n=39
73.1%
§102 Overcome
n=104
72.6%
§103 Overcome
n=168
77.2%
§112 Overcome
n=167

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61P, F41A
Top CPC Subclasses
38%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=410
6
Practitioners
n=410
68.3
Apps / Practitioner
n=410

Portfolio Summary

18
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
12
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

10
Hard (56%)
6
Medium (33%)
2
Easy (11%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (11%)
§101 + other3 (17%)
§103 only3 (17%)
§112 only1 (6%)
Double-patenting only1 (6%)
Double-patenting + other3 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (28%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
28% of docket
1
Information Tech
6% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
12
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

180 h
Manual time on pending OAs
36 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
63 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BERMAN, STEPHEN DAVID 1 78.4% +58.3%
CUMBESS, YOLANDA RENEE 1 86.8% +8.7%
BAYS, MARIE D 1 74.5% +19.5%
MORGAN, DERRICK R 1 72.7% +27.0%
TILLMAN, JR, REGINALD S 1 77.8% +11.4%
LEE, ANDREW P 1 48.5% +22.8%
KIM, YUNJU 1 55.2% +35.4%
SUBRAMANIAN, NARAYANSWAMY 1 28.3% +30.1%
BRAVO, JOCELYN MARY 1 50.3% +44.7%
WARDEN, MICHAEL J 1 25.4% +21.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19303323 System for Identifying, Tracking, Controlling, and/or Optimizing Stacked Shipping Assets in an Inventory Management Facility and Related Methods CUMBESS, YOLANDA RENEE —

Hard Cases (10)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18744198 CONTROL SYSTEM FOR RAILWAY YARD AND RELATED METHODS EL-BATHY, IBRAHIM N 126d overdue
19243589 INTERCHANGEABLE FOOTBED FOR FOOTWEAR AND A MODULAR SHOE SYSTEM HAVING AN INTERCHANGEABLE FOOTBED BAYS, MARIE D 42d overdue
18385490 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING GASTROINTESTINAL IMPAIRMENT FERNANDES, PATRICK M 4d overdue
18912228 INSERT CHANGEOVER SYSTEM FOR AN INJECTION MOLD KIM, YUNJU 20d
18771807 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A PRIVATE SECTOR MONETARY AUTHORITY MAGUIRE, LINDSAY M 23d
19405375 SYSTEM FOR, AND METHOD OF, PROVIDING AN ABSOLUTE ZERO-CODE APPLICATION COMPOSITION PLATFORM BERMAN, STEPHEN DAVID —
18912193 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING USER INTERACTION FOR INSURANCE ENROLLMENTS SUBRAMANIAN, NARAYANSWAMY —
18805323 SOCK FOR IMPROVING COMFORT FOR A USER BRAVO, JOCELYN MARY —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19243589 INTERCHANGEABLE FOOTBED FOR FOOTWEAR AND A MODULAR SHOE SYSTEM HAVING AN INTERCHANGEABLE FOOTBED BAYS, MARIE D 42d overdue
18912228 INSERT CHANGEOVER SYSTEM FOR AN INJECTION MOLD KIM, YUNJU 20d
19405375 SYSTEM FOR, AND METHOD OF, PROVIDING AN ABSOLUTE ZERO-CODE APPLICATION COMPOSITION PLATFORM BERMAN, STEPHEN DAVID —
19030336 FIREARM BUFFER SYSTEM AND BUTTSTOCK ASSEMBLY MORGAN, DERRICK R —
18990517 ADJUSTABLE GAS BLOCK FOR AN INDIRECT GAS OPERATED FIREARM TILLMAN, JR, REGINALD S —
18916596 Novel Beta-Alanine Compositions and Methods of Use Thereof LEE, ANDREW P —
18912193 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING USER INTERACTION FOR INSURANCE ENROLLMENTS SUBRAMANIAN, NARAYANSWAMY —
18805323 SOCK FOR IMPROVING COMFORT FOR A USER BRAVO, JOCELYN MARY —

Client Portfolio (15 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37322
36412
36192
16262
21921
36511
16911
17421
36911
36941

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19405375 SYSTEM FOR, AND METHOD OF, PROVIDING AN ABSOLUTE ZERO-CODE APPLICATION COMPOSITION PLATFORM Ucbos, Inc. BERMAN, STEPHEN DAVID 2192 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 01, 2025
19303323 System for Identifying, Tracking, Controlling, and/or Optimizing Stacked Shipping Assets in an Inventory Management Facility and Related Methods All Terminal Services, LLC CUMBESS, YOLANDA RENEE 3651 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 18, 2025
19243589 INTERCHANGEABLE FOOTBED FOR FOOTWEAR AND A MODULAR SHOE SYSTEM HAVING AN INTERCHANGEABLE FOOTBED Csr Developments, LLC BAYS, MARIE D 3732 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 42d overdue Pending Jun 19, 2025
19030336 FIREARM BUFFER SYSTEM AND BUTTSTOCK ASSEMBLY Lwrc International LLC MORGAN, DERRICK R 3641 §102DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 17, 2025
18990517 ADJUSTABLE GAS BLOCK FOR AN INDIRECT GAS OPERATED FIREARM Lwrc International LLC TILLMAN, JR, REGINALD S 3641 DP Final Rejection — Pending Dec 20, 2024
18916596 Novel Beta-Alanine Compositions and Methods of Use Thereof Natural Alternatives International, Inc. LEE, ANDREW P 1691 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 15, 2024
18912228 INSERT CHANGEOVER SYSTEM FOR AN INJECTION MOLD Cube Packaging Solutions Inc. KIM, YUNJU 1742 §102§103 Final Rejection 20d Pending Oct 10, 2024
18912193 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING USER INTERACTION FOR INSURANCE ENROLLMENTS Fbmc Benefits Management, Inc. SUBRAMANIAN, NARAYANSWAMY 3691 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 10, 2024
18805323 SOCK FOR IMPROVING COMFORT FOR A USER Viiz Socks LLC BRAVO, JOCELYN MARY 3732 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 14, 2024
18784613 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A PRIVATE SECTOR MONETARY AUTHORITY Fulcrum Ip Corporation WARDEN, MICHAEL J 3694 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 25, 2024
18771807 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A PRIVATE SECTOR MONETARY AUTHORITY Fulcrum Ip Corporation MAGUIRE, LINDSAY M 3619 §101§112 Final Rejection 23d Pending Jul 12, 2024
18766631 CRYPTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY PLATFORM AND METHODS FOR PROVIDERS TO ENABLE USERS TO MONETIZE THEIR DATA Finco Services, Inc. HUANG, JAY 3619 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 08, 2024
18744198 CONTROL SYSTEM FOR RAILWAY YARD AND RELATED METHODS All Terminal Services, LLC EL-BATHY, IBRAHIM N 3628 §101 Final Rejection 126d overdue Pending Jun 14, 2024
18661570 DEVICES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF FOR NON-HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION Elle, Md Biotechnologies Inc. MCCARTHY, GINA 3786 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 11, 2024
18385490 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING GASTROINTESTINAL IMPAIRMENT UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FERNANDES, PATRICK M 3791 §101§112DP Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Oct 31, 2023
18014545 THERAPY OF POST-OPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING Lxo US, Inc. FETTEROLF, BRANDON J 1626 §103DP Final Rejection 23d overdue Pending Jan 05, 2023
17953307 Compositions and uses of Oligo-chromopeptides and methods of making Bonafide Health, LLC AUDET, MAURY A 1654 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 26, 2022
17252255 Ionic Liquid Preparation Seren Technologies Limited HERNANDEZ, JACKSON J 1626 §103DP Final Rejection — Pending Dec 14, 2020

Managing Arnall Golden Gregory LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Arnall Golden Gregory LLP's patent allowance rate?

89.4% of resolved applications prosecuted by Arnall Golden Gregory LLP were allowed, across 410 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Arnall Golden Gregory LLP average before allowance?

3.85 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Arnall Golden Gregory LLP have?

18 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 15 clients, before 18 examiners in 14 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month