Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026

Atlanta Baker Donelson

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 6 clients • 8 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 28 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Atlanta Baker Donelson operates extensively within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area, as evidenced by 2415 career applications. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate pct of 86.48, showing a consistent ability to move applications toward issuance. This process involves an avg office actions per allowance of 3.15, which serves as a standard for their prosecution efficiency in this technical domain.

There are currently 6 pending office actions under management, representing the firm's immediate prosecution tasks. Given the 2415 career applications, these 6 pending office actions are part of a much larger historical context of work. The resolved allowance rate pct of 86.48 and the avg office actions per allowance of 3.15 characterize the firm's long-term performance in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. These 6 pending office actions are the current focus of the firm's efforts.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=2415 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

86.5%
Allowance Rate
n=2415
+0.72σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=2415
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=1450
-0.24σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1450
1113 days
Time to Allowance
n=1450
+12.1pp
Interview Lift
n=2415
21.9%
RCE Rate
n=2415
3.8%
Appeal Rate
n=2415

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

79.7%
§101 Overcome
n=133
79.9%
§102 Overcome
n=533
80.5%
§103 Overcome
n=824
80.6%
§112 Overcome
n=767

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61P, C07K
Top CPC Subclasses
26%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=2415
9
Practitioners
n=2415
268.3
Apps / Practitioner
n=2415

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (62%)
3
Medium (38%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (25%)
§102 only1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (62%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
12% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
1
Business / Other
12% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HAWN, PATRICK D 1 65.9% +38.1%
LE, HUYEN D 1 73.0% +8.3%
LOPEZ, ERICK I 1 53.4% +29.7%
RESTAINO, ANDREW PETER 1 72.4% +39.2%
HOLWERDA, KATHLEEN SONNETT 1 68.8% +17.6%
CHIN, PAUL T 1 71.6% +15.7%
PONCIANO, PATRICK BERNAS 1 56.3% +9.4%
MCKINNON, LASHAWNDA T 1 54.0% +30.2%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18839965 METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A CUTTING HEAD, A CUTTING HEAD, AND A PERFORATOR RESTAINO, ANDREW PETER 56d
19040131 RECONFIGURABLE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR A WALK-IN TUB BATHING INSTALLATION WITH A SINGLE PUMP FOR MULTIPLE FUNCTIONS LE, HUYEN D —
18847244 APPAREL ARTICLE WITH TEXTURED GRIP LOPEZ, ERICK I —
18755859 PERFORATOR HOLWERDA, KATHLEEN SONNETT —
17786283 Stitching Pattern Tufted Geotextile For Infill Stability MCKINNON, LASHAWNDA T —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18839965 METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A CUTTING HEAD, A CUTTING HEAD, AND A PERFORATOR RESTAINO, ANDREW PETER 56d
19205149 ANCHORING STRUCTURE FOR MOUNTING OF SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM HAWN, PATRICK D —
18847244 APPAREL ARTICLE WITH TEXTURED GRIP LOPEZ, ERICK I —
18755859 PERFORATOR HOLWERDA, KATHLEEN SONNETT —
18699996 DOOR RELEASE MECHANISM FOR A CONTAINER SYSTEM CHIN, PAUL T —
17786283 Stitching Pattern Tufted Geotextile For Infill Stability MCKINNON, LASHAWNDA T —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37712
36311
37321
36541
36341
17891

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19205149 ANCHORING STRUCTURE FOR MOUNTING OF SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM Watershed Geosynthetics LLC HAWN, PATRICK D 3631 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 12, 2025
19040131 RECONFIGURABLE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR A WALK-IN TUB BATHING INSTALLATION WITH A SINGLE PUMP FOR MULTIPLE FUNCTIONS Daniel Oliver LE, HUYEN D §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 29, 2025
18847244 APPAREL ARTICLE WITH TEXTURED GRIP Bakner Manufacturing, LLC LOPEZ, ERICK I 3732 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 14, 2024
18839965 METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A CUTTING HEAD, A CUTTING HEAD, AND A PERFORATOR Adeor Medical AG RESTAINO, ANDREW PETER 3771 §102§103 Final Rejection 56d Pending Aug 20, 2024
18755859 PERFORATOR Adeor Medical AG HOLWERDA, KATHLEEN SONNETT 3771 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 27, 2024
18699996 DOOR RELEASE MECHANISM FOR A CONTAINER SYSTEM Conquip Engineering Group CHIN, PAUL T 3654 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 10, 2024
18418881 DUAL SEAL ACCESS PANEL Driploc, Inc. PONCIANO, PATRICK BERNAS 3634 §103 Final Rejection 22d Pending Jan 22, 2024
17786283 Stitching Pattern Tufted Geotextile For Infill Stability Watershed Geosynthetics LLC MCKINNON, LASHAWNDA T 1789 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 16, 2022

Managing Atlanta Baker Donelson's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Atlanta Baker Donelson's patent allowance rate?

86.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by Atlanta Baker Donelson were allowed, across 2,415 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Atlanta Baker Donelson average before allowance?

3.15 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Atlanta Baker Donelson have?

8 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 8 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month