Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Avyno Law P.C.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 3 clients • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Avyno Law P.C. works in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering, with 5 pending office actions and 555 career applications. The active docket is limited compared with the firm’s recorded application volume, so the current matters represent a focused portion of its prosecution activity.

The resolved allowance rate is 96.25%, and the average is 2.13 office actions per allowance. Resolved matters have frequently reached allowance, with the average indicating relatively few examination exchanges in the recorded allowance process. Practitioners can use this profile to balance a favorable outcome pattern against the technical demands of device and mechanical claim development.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=555 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

96.2%
Allowance Rate
n=555
+0.39σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=555
2.1
OAs to Allowance
n=436
-0.87σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=436
854 days
Time to Allowance
n=436
+1.1pp
Interview Lift
n=555
17.4%
RCE Rate
n=555
0.3%
Appeal Rate
n=555

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=18 (min 20)
85.4%
§102 Overcome
n=103
84.3%
§103 Overcome
n=140
91.0%
§112 Overcome
n=166

Specialization & Scale

Y02E, C10B, Y02P
Top CPC Subclasses
12%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=555
1
Practitioners
n=555
555.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=555

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
4
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (80%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
40% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FLORES, JUAN G 1 79.6% +14.5%
LANGEL, WAYNE A 1 78.4% +23.3%
AYALEW, TINSAE B 1 75.8% +9.1%
TREMARCHE, CONNOR J. 1 65.7% +27.8%
PINDERSKI, JACQUELINE M 1 26.8% +45.4%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18582455 Steamer AYALEW, TINSAE B —
17567289 Temperature-Controlled Massage Node PINDERSKI, JACQUELINE M —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17956747 Window Fan TREMARCHE, CONNOR J. 72d overdue
19239761 Fan FLORES, JUAN G 35d
18732435 CONTROL OF PYROLYSIS CONDITIONS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DESIRABLE COMPOUNDS LANGEL, WAYNE A —
17567289 Temperature-Controlled Massage Node PINDERSKI, JACQUELINE M —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37451
17361
17111
37621
37851

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19239761 Fan Vornado Air, LLC FLORES, JUAN G 3745 §103 Final Rejection 35d Pending Jun 16, 2025
18732435 CONTROL OF PYROLYSIS CONDITIONS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DESIRABLE COMPOUNDS Talipot Cool Extract (Ip), LLC LANGEL, WAYNE A 1736 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 03, 2024
18582455 Steamer Vornado Air, LLC AYALEW, TINSAE B 1711 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 20, 2024
17956747 Window Fan Vornado Air, LLC TREMARCHE, CONNOR J. 3762 §103 Non-Final OA 72d overdue Pending Sep 29, 2022
17567289 Temperature-Controlled Massage Node Merchsource, LLC PINDERSKI, JACQUELINE M 3785 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 03, 2022

Managing Avyno Law P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Avyno Law P.C.'s patent allowance rate?

96.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Avyno Law P.C. were allowed, across 555 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Avyno Law P.C. average before allowance?

2.13 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Avyno Law P.C. have?

5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 3 clients, before 5 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month