Technology areas: Computing & Software • Communications
7 pending office actions • 3 clients • 7 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Bachmann Law Group PC practices in Communications, with 7 pending office actions and 106 career applications. The current action docket is a visible portion of the firm’s recorded application activity, making response management important to the overall prosecution portfolio.
The resolved allowance rate is 50.94%, and the average is 3.63 office actions per allowance. The rate shows that resolved matters have reached allowance in about half of the recorded outcomes, while the action average points to repeated examination interaction. Practitioners should prepare claim amendments and argument strategies with particular attention to communications-specific distinctions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (14%) |
| §101 + other | 3 (43%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (43%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRACY JR., EDWARD | 1 | 76.5% | +38.4% |
| ROBERTS, SHAUN A | 1 | 76.2% | +10.2% |
| MOBIN, HASANUL | 1 | 75.3% | +38.8% |
| ERB, NATHAN | 1 | 51.4% | -0.1% |
| MEIS, JON CHRISTOPHER | 1 | 32.4% | +53.0% |
| NILSSON, ERIC | 1 | 82.8% | +16.8% |
| DUMBRIS, SETH M | 1 | 76.4% | +16.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17147462 | COMPOSITE FORMED FROM SEMI-CONTINUOUS AND MULTI-STEP PROCESS | DUMBRIS, SETH M | 11d overdue |
| 18751047 | INTELLIGENT CONSTRAINED DECODING | ROBERTS, SHAUN A | 6d |
| 18545712 | AUTOMATED AGENT CONTROLS | ERB, NATHAN | 22d |
| 18986160 | INDUCED AND DYNAMIC GRAMMAR GENERATION | TRACY JR., EDWARD | — |
| 18606237 | AUTOMATED AGENT CHAIN-OF-THOUGHT RESPONSE GENERATION USING STRUCTURE-BASED CONSTRAINTS | MOBIN, HASANUL | — |
| 18388532 | GENERATED AUTOMATED AGENT INSTRUCTIONS FROM USER TRAINING MATERIALS | MEIS, JON CHRISTOPHER | — |
| 17339988 | AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING ASSERTIONS AND INSIGHTS | NILSSON, ERIC | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17147462 | COMPOSITE FORMED FROM SEMI-CONTINUOUS AND MULTI-STEP PROCESS | DUMBRIS, SETH M | 11d overdue |
| 18751047 | INTELLIGENT CONSTRAINED DECODING | ROBERTS, SHAUN A | 6d |
| 18986160 | INDUCED AND DYNAMIC GRAMMAR GENERATION | TRACY JR., EDWARD | — |
| 18606237 | AUTOMATED AGENT CHAIN-OF-THOUGHT RESPONSE GENERATION USING STRUCTURE-BASED CONSTRAINTS | MOBIN, HASANUL | — |
| 18388532 | GENERATED AUTOMATED AGENT INSTRUCTIONS FROM USER TRAINING MATERIALS | MEIS, JON CHRISTOPHER | — |
| 17339988 | AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING ASSERTIONS AND INSIGHTS | NILSSON, ERIC | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Scaled Cognition, Inc. | 5 |
| Asserts Inc. | 1 |
| Hemlock Semiconductor | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2656 | 1 |
| 2655 | 1 |
| 2168 | 1 |
| 3628 | 1 |
| 2654 | 1 |
| 2151 | 1 |
| 1784 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18986160 | INDUCED AND DYNAMIC GRAMMAR GENERATION | Scaled Cognition, Inc. | TRACY JR., EDWARD | 2656 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 18, 2024 |
| 18751047 | INTELLIGENT CONSTRAINED DECODING | Scaled Cognition, Inc. | ROBERTS, SHAUN A | 2655 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 6d | Pending | Jun 21, 2024 |
| 18606237 | AUTOMATED AGENT CHAIN-OF-THOUGHT RESPONSE GENERATION USING STRUCTURE-BASED CONSTRAINTS | Scaled Cognition, Inc. | MOBIN, HASANUL | 2168 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 15, 2024 |
| 18545712 | AUTOMATED AGENT CONTROLS | Scaled Cognition, Inc. | ERB, NATHAN | 3628 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 22d | Pending | Dec 19, 2023 |
| 18388532 | GENERATED AUTOMATED AGENT INSTRUCTIONS FROM USER TRAINING MATERIALS | Scaled Cognition, Inc. | MEIS, JON CHRISTOPHER | 2654 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 10, 2023 |
| 17339988 | AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING ASSERTIONS AND INSIGHTS | Asserts Inc. | NILSSON, ERIC | 2151 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 05, 2021 |
| 17147462 | COMPOSITE FORMED FROM SEMI-CONTINUOUS AND MULTI-STEP PROCESS | Hemlock Semiconductor Operations LLC | DUMBRIS, SETH M | 1784 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 11d overdue | Pending | Jan 13, 2021 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial50.9% of resolved applications prosecuted by Bachmann Law Group Pc were allowed, across 106 applications in USPTO records.
3.63 office actions per allowed application on average.
7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 3 clients, before 7 examiners in 7 art units.
