Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Baker & Mckenzie LLP (Dallas Account)

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 8 clients • 8 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP (Dallas account) handles Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals, with 8 pending office actions and 2625 career applications. The current docket is limited in relation to the firm’s recorded application activity, placing the active matters within a broad prosecution history.

The resolved allowance rate is 89.69%, and the average is 2.82 office actions per allowance. Resolved matters have commonly reached allowance after several examination exchanges. Practitioners should combine careful response planning with close attention to the biological, pharmaceutical, and therapeutic distinctions that define claim scope.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=2625 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

89.7%
Allowance Rate
n=2625
+0.54σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=2625
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=1948
-0.28σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1948
944 days
Time to Allowance
n=1948
+3.7pp
Interview Lift
n=2625
21.9%
RCE Rate
n=2625
1.1%
Appeal Rate
n=2625

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

84.6%
§101 Overcome
n=162
89.3%
§102 Overcome
n=712
87.3%
§103 Overcome
n=939
88.6%
§112 Overcome
n=632

Specialization & Scale

H04L, G06F, G11C
Top CPC Subclasses
20%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=2625
0
Practitioners
n=2625
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=2625 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (50%)
3
Medium (38%)
1
Easy (12%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (12%)
§103 only1 (12%)
§102 only1 (12%)
Double-patenting only1 (12%)
Double-patenting + other1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (38%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
50% of docket
1
Information Tech
12% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
38% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
COHEN, MICHAEL P 1 58.9% +27.3%
ZEE, EDWARD 1 90.6% +10.3%
CHEN, VIVIAN 1 56.6% +28.5%
BAKER, LORI LYNN 1 78.6% +6.6%
BROWN, SETH RICHARD 1 48.9% +44.3%
POPOVICS, ROBERT J 1 55.4% +23.1%
MILLNER, MONICA E 1 77.4% +21.8%
GUSSOW, ANNE 1 57.9% +43.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19183340 DOMAIN-SPECIFIC LANGUAGE SIMULANT FOR SIMULATING A THREAT-ACTOR AND ADVERSARIAL TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES ZEE, EDWARD —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19326649 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE ANTIVIRAL USE OF SYNTHETIC LYSINE ANALOGS AND MIMETICS COHEN, MICHAEL P —
18990511 Toilet Flange Nut BAKER, LORI LYNN —
18958154 CURVED LINKAGE SYSTEM FOR A SHOULDER BRACE BROWN, SETH RICHARD —
18037003 SYSTEMS FOR THE DETECTION OF TARGETED GENE VARIATIONS AND VIRAL GENOMES AND METHODS OF PRODUCING AND USING SAME GUSSOW, ANNE —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19326649 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE ANTIVIRAL USE OF SYNTHETIC LYSINE ANALOGS AND MIMETICS COHEN, MICHAEL P —
19183340 DOMAIN-SPECIFIC LANGUAGE SIMULANT FOR SIMULATING A THREAT-ACTOR AND ADVERSARIAL TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES ZEE, EDWARD —
19042918 Composite Thermoplastic Laminate CHEN, VIVIAN —
18958154 CURVED LINKAGE SYSTEM FOR A SHOULDER BRACE BROWN, SETH RICHARD —
18791677 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DEWATERING SOLID PARTICLES IN A CONTAMINATED LIQUID MIXTURE POPOVICS, ROBERT J —
18640587 MOUNTING BAR CONNECTION SYSTEM MILLNER, MONICA E —
18037003 SYSTEMS FOR THE DETECTION OF TARGETED GENE VARIATIONS AND VIRAL GENOMES AND METHODS OF PRODUCING AND USING SAME GUSSOW, ANNE —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16121
24351
17871
37541
37861
17761
36341
16831

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19326649 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE ANTIVIRAL USE OF SYNTHETIC LYSINE ANALOGS AND MIMETICS Anti-Viral Technologies, LLC COHEN, MICHAEL P 1612 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 11, 2025
19183340 DOMAIN-SPECIFIC LANGUAGE SIMULANT FOR SIMULATING A THREAT-ACTOR AND ADVERSARIAL TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES Qualys, Inc. ZEE, EDWARD 2435 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 18, 2025
19042918 Composite Thermoplastic Laminate Xamax Industries, Inc. CHEN, VIVIAN 1787 §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 31, 2025
18990511 Toilet Flange Nut Coflex S.A. De C.V. BAKER, LORI LYNN 3754 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2024
18958154 CURVED LINKAGE SYSTEM FOR A SHOULDER BRACE Breg, Inc. BROWN, SETH RICHARD 3786 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 25, 2024
18791677 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DEWATERING SOLID PARTICLES IN A CONTAMINATED LIQUID MIXTURE 1934612 Ontario Inc. POPOVICS, ROBERT J 1776 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 01, 2024
18640587 MOUNTING BAR CONNECTION SYSTEM Cinelease, LLC MILLNER, MONICA E 3634 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 19, 2024
18037003 SYSTEMS FOR THE DETECTION OF TARGETED GENE VARIATIONS AND VIRAL GENOMES AND METHODS OF PRODUCING AND USING SAME World Biotech Regenerative Medical Group Limited GUSSOW, ANNE 1683 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 15, 2023

Managing Baker & Mckenzie LLP (Dallas Account)'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Baker & Mckenzie LLP (Dallas Account)'s patent allowance rate?

89.7% of resolved applications prosecuted by Baker & Mckenzie LLP (Dallas Account) were allowed, across 2,625 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Baker & Mckenzie LLP (Dallas Account) average before allowance?

2.82 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Baker & Mckenzie LLP (Dallas Account) have?

8 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 8 clients, before 8 examiners in 8 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month