Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

8 pending office actions • 7 clients • 8 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 11 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Baker Donelson handles Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals, with 8 pending office actions and 2415 career applications. The current docket is limited compared with the firm’s recorded application volume, placing the active matters within a much broader prosecution history.

The resolved allowance rate is 86.46%, and the average is 3.15 office actions per allowance. Resolved applications have often reached allowance, while the action average indicates that multiple examination exchanges are typical. Practitioners should plan responses around both the favorable allowance pattern and the technical distinctions required for biotechnology and pharmaceutical claims.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=2415 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

86.5%
Allowance Rate
n=2415
+0.72σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=2415
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=1450
-0.24σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1450
1113 days
Time to Allowance
n=1450
+12.1pp
Interview Lift
n=2415
21.9%
RCE Rate
n=2415
3.8%
Appeal Rate
n=2415

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

79.7%
§101 Overcome
n=133
79.9%
§102 Overcome
n=533
80.5%
§103 Overcome
n=824
80.6%
§112 Overcome
n=767

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61P, C07K
Top CPC Subclasses
26%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=2415
9
Practitioners
n=2415
268.3
Apps / Practitioner
n=2415

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (12%)
3
Medium (38%)
1
Easy (12%)
3
Unknown (38%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (12%)
Double-patenting + other3 (38%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (12%)
No statute on record3 (38%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

8
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HENLEY III, RAYMOND J 1 83.5% +2.3%
EDGINGTONGIORDANO, FRANCESCA 1 71.8% +29.4%
BERRY, LAYLA D 1 66.0% +9.0%
MONTANARI, DAVID A 1 64.8% +49.0%
JADHAO, SAMADHAN JAISING 1 46.2% +47.0%
BUNNER, BRIDGET E 1 64.6% +19.8%
CANELLA, KAREN A 1 62.3% +32.8%
PECKHAM, RICHARD GRANT 1 68.1% +36.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18692097 ANTI-CD3 ANTIBODIES EDGINGTONGIORDANO, FRANCESCA —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18507469 METHODS FOR TREATING CANCER USING T CELLS WHICH EXPRESS A CHIMERIC NK RECEPTOR MONTANARI, DAVID A 7d
18178783 COMPOUND TARGETING IL-23A AND TNF-ALPHA AND USES THEREOF BUNNER, BRIDGET E 28d
18692097 ANTI-CD3 ANTIBODIES EDGINGTONGIORDANO, FRANCESCA —
18150917 METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING AND/OR REGULATING SENESCENCE JADHAO, SAMADHAN JAISING —
17920445 ANTI-HUMAN VISTA ANTIBODIES AND USE THEREOF CANELLA, KAREN A —
17607438 METHOD FOR TREATING COUGH BY USING DIAMINOPYRIMIDINE COMPOUND PECKHAM, RICHARD GRANT —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16432
16291
16231
16321
16721
16471
16271

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19361222 TREATING IRON DEFICIENCY WITH FERRIC CARBOXYMALTOSE Pharmacosmos Holding A/S HENLEY III, RAYMOND J 1629 Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 17, 2025
18692097 ANTI-CD3 ANTIBODIES Adimab, LLC EDGINGTONGIORDANO, FRANCESCA 1643 §102§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 14, 2024
18294572 IRON COMPLEX COMPOUNDS FOR SUBCUTANEOUS USE IN THERAPY OF IRON DEFICIENCY IN COMPANION ANIMALS Pharmacosmos Holding A/S BERRY, LAYLA D 1623 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA 83d Pending Feb 02, 2024
18507469 METHODS FOR TREATING CANCER USING T CELLS WHICH EXPRESS A CHIMERIC NK RECEPTOR The Trustees of Dartmouth College MONTANARI, DAVID A 1632 §112 Final Rejection 7d Pending Nov 13, 2023
18150917 METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING AND/OR REGULATING SENESCENCE Institute Of Zoology, Chinese Academy Of Sciences JADHAO, SAMADHAN JAISING 1672 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 03, 2023
18178783 COMPOUND TARGETING IL-23A AND TNF-ALPHA AND USES THEREOF Macrogenics, Inc. BUNNER, BRIDGET E 1647 Other Final Rejection 28d Pending Mar 06, 2023
17920445 ANTI-HUMAN VISTA ANTIBODIES AND USE THEREOF Immunext, Inc. CANELLA, KAREN A 1643 §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 21, 2022
17607438 METHOD FOR TREATING COUGH BY USING DIAMINOPYRIMIDINE COMPOUND BEIJING TIDE PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. PECKHAM, RICHARD GRANT 1627 — Final Rejection — Pending Oct 29, 2021

Managing Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C.'s patent allowance rate?

86.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. were allowed, across 2,415 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. average before allowance?

3.15 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. have?

8 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 7 clients, before 8 examiners in 7 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month