Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Biotech Beach Law Pc

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 7 clients • 8 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

BIOTECH BEACH LAW PC operates in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector, having managed 850 career applications. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 87.5 percent, demonstrating a high level of success in securing patent grants. There are currently 9 pending office actions being handled by the firm relative to its 850 career applications.

The prosecution cycle at the firm averages 3.16 office actions per allowance. This 3.16 figure indicates a detailed engagement with patent examiners, which is common in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals field. For practitioners, the 850 career applications and the 87.5 percent resolved allowance rate provide a clear picture of the firm's long-term performance. The 9 pending office actions and the 3.16 office actions per allowance metric further illustrate the firm's active workload and its typical path to achieving an allowance. These data points together highlight a firm with a consistent and reliable prosecution history.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=850 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.5%
Allowance Rate
n=850
+0.67σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=850
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=553
-0.46σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=553
1076 days
Time to Allowance
n=553
+8.8pp
Interview Lift
n=850
24.2%
RCE Rate
n=850
0.9%
Appeal Rate
n=850

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

92.7%
§101 Overcome
n=41
82.3%
§102 Overcome
n=243
83.1%
§103 Overcome
n=373
84.8%
§112 Overcome
n=354

Specialization & Scale

A61L, A61K, A61F
Top CPC Subclasses
20%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=850
0
Practitioners
n=850
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=850 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (38%)
4
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (12%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (38%)
§102 only1 (12%)
§112 only1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (38%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HESS, DOUGLAS A 1 88.8% +10.7%
CRAWFORD, GENE O 1 45.9% +5.7%
KASAYAN, KATRIEL BARCELLANO 1 25.0% +0.0%
JALALZADEH ABYANE, SHILA 1 50.6% +48.9%
MCWILLIAMS, KELSEY LYNN 1 88.9% +5.8%
KASSA, TIGABU 1 36.7% +27.9%
RIVERA, CARLOS A 1 77.3% +29.2%
GIAMMONA, FRANCESCA FILIPPA 1 37.5% +57.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19113911 Crossbelt Sorter HESS, DOUGLAS A —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18026101 METHODS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF GENOME EDITED PLANTS MCWILLIAMS, KELSEY LYNN 71d overdue
18705554 METHOD OF MOUNTING A BIOLOGICAL SAMPLE ON A SURFACE KASAYAN, KATRIEL BARCELLANO 33d
18873698 INTRALOGISTIC CONVEYOR ARRANGEMENT CRAWFORD, GENE O —
18008421 NANOPARTICULATE COMPOSITION KASSA, TIGABU —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18550285 SPORTS APPARATUS JALALZADEH ABYANE, SHILA 38d overdue
17801500 METHOD AND ASSEMBLY FOR POLISHING OPTICAL CABLES RIVERA, CARLOS A 30d overdue
19113911 Crossbelt Sorter HESS, DOUGLAS A —
18008421 NANOPARTICULATE COMPOSITION KASSA, TIGABU —
17413181 NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION AND IDENTIFICATION METHOD GIAMMONA, FRANCESCA FILIPPA —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36512
16341
37841
16631
16191
37231
16811

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19113911 Crossbelt Sorter Interroll Holding AG HESS, DOUGLAS A 3651 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 21, 2025
18873698 INTRALOGISTIC CONVEYOR ARRANGEMENT Interroll Holding AG CRAWFORD, GENE O 3651 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 10, 2024
18705554 METHOD OF MOUNTING A BIOLOGICAL SAMPLE ON A SURFACE Resolve Biosciences GmbH KASAYAN, KATRIEL BARCELLANO 1634 §103 Final Rejection 33d Pending Apr 27, 2024
18550285 SPORTS APPARATUS BOWNCE HOLDING PLC JALALZADEH ABYANE, SHILA 3784 §112 Non-Final OA 38d overdue Pending Sep 12, 2023
18026101 METHODS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF GENOME EDITED PLANTS Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. MCWILLIAMS, KELSEY LYNN 1663 §103§112 Non-Final OA 71d overdue Pending Mar 13, 2023
18008421 NANOPARTICULATE COMPOSITION Algiax Pharmaceuticals GmbH KASSA, TIGABU 1619 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 05, 2022
17801500 METHOD AND ASSEMBLY FOR POLISHING OPTICAL CABLES Precision Fiber Products, Inc. RIVERA, CARLOS A 3723 §103 Final Rejection 30d overdue Pending Aug 22, 2022
17413181 NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION AND IDENTIFICATION METHOD Lexogen GmbH GIAMMONA, FRANCESCA FILIPPA 1681 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 11, 2021

Managing Biotech Beach Law Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month