Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Boardman & Clark LLP

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

13 pending office actions • 8 clients • 13 examiners • 12 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Boardman & Clark LLP handles Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems matters and has 12 pending office actions. Its career record includes 1423 applications, creating a substantial basis for reviewing prosecution experience in this area.

The resolved allowance rate is 90.25%, and the average number of office actions per allowance is 3.14. These figures separate two practical considerations for counsel selection: the reported rate of resolved allowances and the office-action activity typically associated with obtaining one.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1423 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

90.2%
Allowance Rate
n=1423
+0.58σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1423
3.1
OAs to Allowance
n=916
-0.35σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=916
1062 days
Time to Allowance
n=916
+4.1pp
Interview Lift
n=1423
22.6%
RCE Rate
n=1423
1.8%
Appeal Rate
n=1423

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

88.7%
§101 Overcome
n=53
85.4%
§102 Overcome
n=350
85.3%
§103 Overcome
n=518
85.7%
§112 Overcome
n=391

Specialization & Scale

H01M, Y02E, B60L
Top CPC Subclasses
31%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1423
4
Practitioners
n=1423
355.8
Apps / Practitioner
n=1423

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (54%)
5
Medium (38%)
1
Easy (8%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (31%)
§112 only1 (8%)
Double-patenting + other1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (54%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
31% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
8% of docket
8
Mechanical / Eng
62% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL 1 80.2% +13.9%
MCGOWAN, JAMIE LOUISE 1 73.6% +16.0%
TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J 1 70.0% +31.7%
WHITE, RODNEY BARNETT 1 82.6% +17.8%
SULLENS, TAVIA L 1 49.8% +46.9%
GAY, JENNIFER HAWKINS 1 85.2% +8.6%
WANG, EUGENIA 1 54.6% +34.5%
KUAN, JOHN CHUNYANG 1 72.5% +47.4%
NORTON, JOHN J 1 67.5% +28.3%
CARRICO, ROBERT SCOTT 1 66.0% +32.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19191725 DOUBLE ANGLE BACK SUPPORT ADJUSTMENT BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL —

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18713423 A METHOD OF LINING A BOREHOLE, A SYSTEM AND COMPONENTS OF SAME GAY, JENNIFER HAWKINS 29d overdue
17722467 THERMAL EPOXY AND POSITIONING OF ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS ZHANG, HAIXIA 6d
18932016 ADJUSTABLE HAND SHOVEL GUIDE MCGOWAN, JAMIE LOUISE —
18821935 CHAIR HAVING INTERCHANGEABLE DECORATIVE FEATURE WHITE, RODNEY BARNETT —
18791600 ACCUMULATOR ASSEMBLY, REFRIGERATION SYSTEM HAVING AN ACCUMULATOR ASSEMBLY, AND METHOD OF LIMITING ACCUMILATION OF COMPRESSOR OIL IN SAME SULLENS, TAVIA L —
18555360 INTELLIGENT LEAD-ACID BATTERY MODULE AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME KUAN, JOHN CHUNYANG —
18282459 INDUCTION HEATER MODULE AND ADJUSTMENT DEVICE FOR INDUCTION HEATING NORTON, JOHN J —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18604333 ABSORBENT GLASS MAT BATTERY WANG, EUGENIA 1d overdue
19191725 DOUBLE ANGLE BACK SUPPORT ADJUSTMENT BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL —
18932016 ADJUSTABLE HAND SHOVEL GUIDE MCGOWAN, JAMIE LOUISE —
18860437 A METHOD OF INSTALLING A CABLE BOLT, A SYSTEM AND COMPONENTS OF SAME TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J —
18821935 CHAIR HAVING INTERCHANGEABLE DECORATIVE FEATURE WHITE, RODNEY BARNETT —
18791600 ACCUMULATOR ASSEMBLY, REFRIGERATION SYSTEM HAVING AN ACCUMULATOR ASSEMBLY, AND METHOD OF LIMITING ACCUMILATION OF COMPRESSOR OIL IN SAME SULLENS, TAVIA L —
18555360 INTELLIGENT LEAD-ACID BATTERY MODULE AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME KUAN, JOHN CHUNYANG —
18282459 INDUCTION HEATER MODULE AND ADJUSTMENT DEVICE FOR INDUCTION HEATING NORTON, JOHN J —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36362
36711
36781
37631
36191
17591
28571
37611
17271
17281

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19191725 DOUBLE ANGLE BACK SUPPORT ADJUSTMENT Anthro Form, LLC BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL 3636 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 28, 2025
18932016 ADJUSTABLE HAND SHOVEL GUIDE Bds Consulting, LLC MCGOWAN, JAMIE LOUISE 3671 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 30, 2024
18860437 A METHOD OF INSTALLING A CABLE BOLT, A SYSTEM AND COMPONENTS OF SAME Minova International Limited TOLEDO-DURAN, EDWIN J 3678 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 25, 2024
18821935 CHAIR HAVING INTERCHANGEABLE DECORATIVE FEATURE Anthro Form, LLC WHITE, RODNEY BARNETT 3636 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 30, 2024
18791600 ACCUMULATOR ASSEMBLY, REFRIGERATION SYSTEM HAVING AN ACCUMULATOR ASSEMBLY, AND METHOD OF LIMITING ACCUMILATION OF COMPRESSOR OIL IN SAME Sub-Zero Group, Inc. SULLENS, TAVIA L 3763 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 01, 2024
18713423 A METHOD OF LINING A BOREHOLE, A SYSTEM AND COMPONENTS OF SAME Minova International Limited GAY, JENNIFER HAWKINS 3619 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 29d overdue Pending May 24, 2024
18604333 ABSORBENT GLASS MAT BATTERY Clarios Germany GmbH & Co. Kg WANG, EUGENIA 1759 §103 Non-Final OA 1d overdue Pending Mar 13, 2024
18555360 INTELLIGENT LEAD-ACID BATTERY MODULE AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME Clarios Germany GmbH & Co. Kg KUAN, JOHN CHUNYANG 2857 §103§112Other Final Rejection — Pending Oct 13, 2023
18282459 INDUCTION HEATER MODULE AND ADJUSTMENT DEVICE FOR INDUCTION HEATING Dynatec LLC NORTON, JOHN J 3761 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 15, 2023
18452692 BATTERY PACK WITH TWO END PLATES Clarios Advanced Solutions GmbH CARRICO, ROBERT SCOTT 1727 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 21, 2023
18033655 VENT ADAPTOR AND BATTERY INCLUDING A VENT ADAPTER Cps Technology Holdings LLC FRANCIS, ADAM JOSEPH 1728 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 25, 2023
17722467 THERMAL EPOXY AND POSITIONING OF ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS Cps Technology Holding LLC ZHANG, HAIXIA 1723 §103§112 Non-Final OA 6d Pending Apr 18, 2022
17268075 ADVANCED BATTERY HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC Clarios Advanced Solutions GmbH ORTIZ, ANGELA Y 3663 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 11, 2021

Managing Boardman & Clark LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Boardman & Clark LLP's patent allowance rate?

90.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Boardman & Clark LLP were allowed, across 1,423 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Boardman & Clark LLP average before allowance?

3.14 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Boardman & Clark LLP have?

13 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 8 clients, before 13 examiners in 12 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month