Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Borchers, Hall, Purks & Wall, Pllc

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 6 clients • 6 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Borchers, Hall, Purks & Wall, PLLC handles patent matters in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The firm has a career total of 122 applications, indicating a specialized practice. Currently, the firm has 4 pending office actions, reflecting a small but active docket of ongoing cases.

The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 85.71 percent. Reaching an allowance requires an average of 3.89 office actions. This average suggests a rigorous prosecution environment where multiple responses are often necessary to secure patent protection in chemistry and materials. The 85.71 percent rate demonstrates a consistent ability to convert applications into granted patents. With only 4 pending office actions, the firm's current focus is on a few specific matters. Practitioners can use the 3.89 average office actions per allowance and the 85.71 percent allowance rate to benchmark the firm's performance against other entities in the Chemistry & Materials sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=122 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

85.7%
Allowance Rate
n=122
+0.65σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=122
3.9
OAs to Allowance
n=54
+0.00σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=54
969 days
Time to Allowance
n=54
+17.0pp
Interview Lift
n=122
36.5%
RCE Rate
n=122
2.3%
Appeal Rate
n=122

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

63.6%
§101 Overcome
n=22
67.6%
§102 Overcome
n=34
66.7%
§103 Overcome
n=48
72.4%
§112 Overcome
n=29

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G06Q, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
19%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=122
0
Practitioners
n=122
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=122 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (17%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (17%)
§101 + other1 (17%)
§103 only1 (17%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
17% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
17% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
17% of docket
3
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHEN, XUEMEI G 1 77.0% +25.6%
SLACHTA, DOUGLAS M 1 82.6% +18.1%
FENG, ZHENGFU J 1 75.5% +39.0%
LE, JOHN H 1 87.8% +6.9%
KHARE, ATUL P 1 54.8% +72.4%
RUFO, RYAN C 1 58.9% +40.8%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18274588 PLASTIC BLASTING MEDIUM AND USE OF A PLASTIC BLASTING MEDIUM KHARE, ATUL P 56d
18821806 PROCESSING OF IMAGE DATA WITH A MACHINE-LEARNED FOUNDATION MODEL CHEN, XUEMEI G —
18724033 AN APPROACH FOR CLASSIFYING SOURCE CODE WITH A CODE QUALITY INDICATOR SLACHTA, DOUGLAS M —
18699642 BATTERY STATE ESTIMATION METHOD LE, JOHN H —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18274588 PLASTIC BLASTING MEDIUM AND USE OF A PLASTIC BLASTING MEDIUM KHARE, ATUL P 56d
18821806 PROCESSING OF IMAGE DATA WITH A MACHINE-LEARNED FOUNDATION MODEL CHEN, XUEMEI G —
18724033 AN APPROACH FOR CLASSIFYING SOURCE CODE WITH A CODE QUALITY INDICATOR SLACHTA, DOUGLAS M —
18638962 AIRFLOW OPTIMIZATION DEVICES FOR CRYPTOCURRENCY MINING, AND RELATED SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS, AND METHODS FENG, ZHENGFU J —
17925466 ALLOY TOOL BIT TWIST DRILL RUFO, RYAN C —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28351
17421
37221

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18821806 PROCESSING OF IMAGE DATA WITH A MACHINE-LEARNED FOUNDATION MODEL Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH CHEN, XUEMEI G §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 30, 2024
18724033 AN APPROACH FOR CLASSIFYING SOURCE CODE WITH A CODE QUALITY INDICATOR Codescene AB SLACHTA, DOUGLAS M §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 25, 2024
18638962 AIRFLOW OPTIMIZATION DEVICES FOR CRYPTOCURRENCY MINING, AND RELATED SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS, AND METHODS Professional Asic Services LLC FENG, ZHENGFU J 2835 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 18, 2024
18699642 BATTERY STATE ESTIMATION METHOD Twaice Technologies GmbH LE, JOHN H §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 09, 2024
18274588 PLASTIC BLASTING MEDIUM AND USE OF A PLASTIC BLASTING MEDIUM Dyemansion GmbH KHARE, ATUL P 1742 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 56d Pending Jul 27, 2023
17925466 ALLOY TOOL BIT TWIST DRILL Shandong Old Roughneck Machinery Technology Co. Ltd. RUFO, RYAN C 3722 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 15, 2022

Managing Borchers, Hall, Purks & Wall, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month