Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Charney Ip Law LLC

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

9 pending office actions • 5 clients • 9 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Charney IP Law LLC has 10 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals and 279 career applications. The current docket is supported by a broader application record, allowing practitioners to consider active workload in the context of established activity in the technology area.

The resolved allowance rate is 85.87%, and the average is 2.94 office actions per allowance. The rate indicates favorable resolved outcomes within the record, while the action average describes the examination activity associated with reaching allowance. Applicants can use both measures to evaluate prosecution results and anticipate the response work required for biotechnology and pharmaceutical claims.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=279 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

85.9%
Allowance Rate
n=279
+0.65σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=279
2.9
OAs to Allowance
n=158
-0.45σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=158
832 days
Time to Allowance
n=158
+19.1pp
Interview Lift
n=279
21.2%
RCE Rate
n=279
0.5%
Appeal Rate
n=279

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

70.0%
§101 Overcome
n=20
72.0%
§102 Overcome
n=75
69.2%
§103 Overcome
n=120
76.6%
§112 Overcome
n=94

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61P, C12N
Top CPC Subclasses
18%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=279
2
Practitioners
n=279
139.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=279

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (67%)
2
Medium (22%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (11%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other4 (44%)
§103 only1 (11%)
Double-patenting + other1 (11%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (22%)
No statute on record1 (11%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
33% of docket
1
Information Tech
11% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
56% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WORSHAM, JESSICA N 1 56.6% +56.4%
ARNETT, NICOLAS ALLEN 1 81.2% +20.7%
BAYNES, KEVIN J 1 74.4% +34.9%
OBAID, HAMZEH M 1 37.9% +21.8%
GOLDBERG, IVAN R 1 35.2% +35.9%
CAO, DIEM K 1 80.6% +18.7%
TUNGATE, SCOTT MICHAEL 1 35.6% +16.1%
ZHU, JIANJIAN 1 58.1% +82.5%
MCLEOD, AFRICA MHAIRIE 1 52.8% +67.7%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18763434 UNIFIED EVENT DESCRIPTIONS FOR PROCESS FLOW DATA CAO, DIEM K —

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17353440 NANOCAPSULES FOR THE DELIVERY OF CELL MODULATING AGENTS MCLEOD, AFRICA MHAIRIE 42d overdue
18887967 AUTOMATED PROCESS FLOW MODEL-DRIVEN CREATION OF A WORK IMPLEMENTATION SPECIFICATION GOLDBERG, IVAN R 23d overdue
19012285 CAPTURING DATA AND MATERIAL CHANGES FOR PROCESS FLOW MODELS OBAID, HAMZEH M 5d
19069521 SYSTEMS, DEVICES AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING THE INSTALLATION OF CONDUCTIVE WIRES AND DATA CABLES MOUNTED ON PERIMETER SECURITY FENCES BAYNES, KEVIN J —
18392554 DYNAMIC PROCESS MODELING TUNGATE, SCOTT MICHAEL —
18078977 DONOR T-CELLS WITH KILL SWITCH ZHU, JIANJIAN —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17353440 NANOCAPSULES FOR THE DELIVERY OF CELL MODULATING AGENTS MCLEOD, AFRICA MHAIRIE 42d overdue
18887967 AUTOMATED PROCESS FLOW MODEL-DRIVEN CREATION OF A WORK IMPLEMENTATION SPECIFICATION GOLDBERG, IVAN R 23d overdue
19012285 CAPTURING DATA AND MATERIAL CHANGES FOR PROCESS FLOW MODELS OBAID, HAMZEH M 5d
19383710 SYNERGISTIC COMBINATION OF NAD+ AND THERAPEUTIC PEPTIDES DELIVERED VIA IONTOPHORESIS FOR ENHANCED AND PROLONGED REGENERATIVE EFFECTS WORSHAM, JESSICA N —
19218497 BULK COOKING OIL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ARNETT, NICOLAS ALLEN —
19069521 SYSTEMS, DEVICES AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING THE INSTALLATION OF CONDUCTIVE WIRES AND DATA CABLES MOUNTED ON PERIMETER SECURITY FENCES BAYNES, KEVIN J —
18763434 UNIFIED EVENT DESCRIPTIONS FOR PROCESS FLOW DATA CAO, DIEM K —
18392554 DYNAMIC PROCESS MODELING TUNGATE, SCOTT MICHAEL —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Zenda 4
CSL 2
Optimal Wellness Inc. 1
Oilmatic Systems, LLC 1
Mind Head LLC 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16151
37531
36781
36241
36191
21961
36281
16311
16351

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19383710 SYNERGISTIC COMBINATION OF NAD+ AND THERAPEUTIC PEPTIDES DELIVERED VIA IONTOPHORESIS FOR ENHANCED AND PROLONGED REGENERATIVE EFFECTS Optimal Wellness Inc. WORSHAM, JESSICA N 1615 §102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 09, 2025
19218497 BULK COOKING OIL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Oilmatic Systems, LLC ARNETT, NICOLAS ALLEN 3753 Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 26, 2025
19069521 SYSTEMS, DEVICES AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING THE INSTALLATION OF CONDUCTIVE WIRES AND DATA CABLES MOUNTED ON PERIMETER SECURITY FENCES Mind Head LLC BAYNES, KEVIN J 3678 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 04, 2025
19012285 CAPTURING DATA AND MATERIAL CHANGES FOR PROCESS FLOW MODELS Zenda, LLC OBAID, HAMZEH M 3624 §101§102 Final Rejection 5d Pending Jan 07, 2025
18887967 AUTOMATED PROCESS FLOW MODEL-DRIVEN CREATION OF A WORK IMPLEMENTATION SPECIFICATION Zenda, LLC GOLDBERG, IVAN R 3619 §101§103 Final Rejection 23d overdue Pending Sep 17, 2024
18763434 UNIFIED EVENT DESCRIPTIONS FOR PROCESS FLOW DATA Zenda, LLC CAO, DIEM K 2196 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 03, 2024
18392554 DYNAMIC PROCESS MODELING Zenda, LLC TUNGATE, SCOTT MICHAEL 3628 §101§102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 21, 2023
18078977 DONOR T-CELLS WITH KILL SWITCH Csl Behring LLC ZHU, JIANJIAN 1631 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 11, 2022
17353440 NANOCAPSULES FOR THE DELIVERY OF CELL MODULATING AGENTS Csl Behring LLC MCLEOD, AFRICA MHAIRIE 1635 §101§102 Non-Final OA 42d overdue Pending Jun 21, 2021

Managing Charney Ip Law LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Charney Ip Law LLC's patent allowance rate?

85.9% of resolved applications prosecuted by Charney Ip Law LLC were allowed, across 279 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Charney Ip Law LLC average before allowance?

2.94 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Charney Ip Law LLC have?

9 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 9 examiners in 9 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month