Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
8 pending office actions • 3 clients • 8 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Charney IP Law LLC operates in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area with 276 career applications. The firm has 5 pending office actions and a resolved allowance rate of 85.64 percent.
The firm averages 2.98 office actions per allowance. This metric indicates the typical number of examiner interactions required to secure a grant. For practitioners, the 85.64 percent allowance rate and the 2.98 average office actions per allowance provide a benchmark for the expected success and the procedural steps involved in prosecuting applications within this technology sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 3 (38%) |
| §103 only | 2 (25%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (12%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (12%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (12%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARNETT, NICOLAS ALLEN | 1 | 81.1% | +20.7% |
| OBAID, HAMZEH M | 1 | 38.3% | +22.4% |
| GOLDBERG, IVAN R | 1 | 35.3% | +35.5% |
| CAO, DIEM K | 1 | 80.5% | +18.8% |
| TUNGATE, SCOTT MICHAEL | 1 | 36.1% | +16.3% |
| ZHU, JIANJIAN | 1 | 58.8% | +82.4% |
| NGUYEN, QUANG | 1 | 38.0% | +52.6% |
| MCLEOD, AFRICA MHAIRIE | 1 | 51.9% | +67.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18763434 | UNIFIED EVENT DESCRIPTIONS FOR PROCESS FLOW DATA | CAO, DIEM K | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17685601 | BIO-PRODUCTION OF LENTIVIRAL VECTORS | NGUYEN, QUANG | 85d overdue |
| 18887967 | AUTOMATED PROCESS FLOW MODEL-DRIVEN CREATION OF A WORK IMPLEMENTATION SPECIFICATION | GOLDBERG, IVAN R | 23d overdue |
| 19012285 | CAPTURING DATA AND MATERIAL CHANGES FOR PROCESS FLOW MODELS | OBAID, HAMZEH M | 5d |
| 18392554 | DYNAMIC PROCESS MODELING | TUNGATE, SCOTT MICHAEL | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17685601 | BIO-PRODUCTION OF LENTIVIRAL VECTORS | NGUYEN, QUANG | 85d overdue |
| 17353440 | NANOCAPSULES FOR THE DELIVERY OF CELL MODULATING AGENTS | MCLEOD, AFRICA MHAIRIE | 42d overdue |
| 18887967 | AUTOMATED PROCESS FLOW MODEL-DRIVEN CREATION OF A WORK IMPLEMENTATION SPECIFICATION | GOLDBERG, IVAN R | 23d overdue |
| 19012285 | CAPTURING DATA AND MATERIAL CHANGES FOR PROCESS FLOW MODELS | OBAID, HAMZEH M | 5d |
| 19218497 | BULK COOKING OIL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM | ARNETT, NICOLAS ALLEN | — |
| 18763434 | UNIFIED EVENT DESCRIPTIONS FOR PROCESS FLOW DATA | CAO, DIEM K | — |
| 18392554 | DYNAMIC PROCESS MODELING | TUNGATE, SCOTT MICHAEL | — |
| 18078977 | DONOR T-CELLS WITH KILL SWITCH | ZHU, JIANJIAN | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Zenda | 4 |
| CSL | 3 |
| Oilmatic Systems, LLC | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1631 | 2 |
| 3624 | 1 |
| 3619 | 1 |
| 3628 | 1 |
| 1635 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19218497 | BULK COOKING OIL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM | Oilmatic Systems, LLC | ARNETT, NICOLAS ALLEN | Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 26, 2025 | |
| 19012285 | CAPTURING DATA AND MATERIAL CHANGES FOR PROCESS FLOW MODELS | Zenda, LLC | OBAID, HAMZEH M | 3624 | §101§102 | Final Rejection | 5d | Pending | Jan 07, 2025 |
| 18887967 | AUTOMATED PROCESS FLOW MODEL-DRIVEN CREATION OF A WORK IMPLEMENTATION SPECIFICATION | Zenda, LLC | GOLDBERG, IVAN R | 3619 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 23d overdue | Pending | Sep 17, 2024 |
| 18763434 | UNIFIED EVENT DESCRIPTIONS FOR PROCESS FLOW DATA | Zenda, LLC | CAO, DIEM K | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 03, 2024 | |
| 18392554 | DYNAMIC PROCESS MODELING | Zenda, LLC | TUNGATE, SCOTT MICHAEL | 3628 | §101§102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 21, 2023 |
| 18078977 | DONOR T-CELLS WITH KILL SWITCH | Csl Behring LLC | ZHU, JIANJIAN | 1631 | §103§112DPOther | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 11, 2022 |
| 17685601 | BIO-PRODUCTION OF LENTIVIRAL VECTORS | Csl Behring Gene Therapy, Inc. | NGUYEN, QUANG | 1631 | §102§112 | Final Rejection | 85d overdue | Pending | Mar 03, 2022 |
| 17353440 | NANOCAPSULES FOR THE DELIVERY OF CELL MODULATING AGENTS | Csl Behring LLC | MCLEOD, AFRICA MHAIRIE | 1635 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 42d overdue | Pending | Jun 21, 2021 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial