Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Clark+Elbing LLP - Revolution Medicines, Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

7 pending office actions • 1 client • 6 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Clark+Elbing LLP - Revolution Medicines, Inc. focuses on Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals and has 7 pending office actions. The profile records 9010 career applications, providing a broad portfolio context for the current unresolved activity.

The resolved allowance rate is 67.77%, and the average office actions per allowance is 3.89. These figures describe historical allowance results and the examination activity associated with matters reaching allowance. Practitioners can use the context for staffing and client communication while applying claim strategy to the individual scientific record.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=9010 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

67.8%
Allowance Rate
n=9010
+0.63σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=9010
3.9
OAs to Allowance
n=3688
-0.04σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=3688
1175 days
Time to Allowance
n=3688
+28.5pp
Interview Lift
n=9010
27.7%
RCE Rate
n=9010
1.1%
Appeal Rate
n=9010

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

75.8%
§101 Overcome
n=583
72.6%
§102 Overcome
n=1802
71.1%
§103 Overcome
n=2617
75.7%
§112 Overcome
n=2972

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61P, C07K
Top CPC Subclasses
50%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=9010
5
Practitioners
n=9010
1802.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=9010

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (29%)
3
Medium (43%)
2
Easy (29%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (43%)
§112 only1 (14%)
Double-patenting only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

7
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S 2 72.7% +18.2%
RZECZYCKI, PHILLIP MATTHEW 1 64.8% +37.0%
SANCHEZ, JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER 1 87.3% +12.1%
CHAO, ALLEN 1 60.0% +0.0%
MCDOWELL, BRIAN E 1 74.0% +31.0%
LADD, CAROLYN LOUISE 1 58.6% +47.1%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18771135 METHODS OF TREATING A RAS RELATED DISEASE OR DISORDER SANCHEZ, JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER —
18479500 METHODS FOR INHIBITING RAS LADD, CAROLYN LOUISE —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18011454 METHODS FOR DELAYING, PREVENTING, AND TREATING ACQUIRED RESISTANCE TO RAS INHIBITORS CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S 132d overdue
19308717 RAS INHIBITORS RZECZYCKI, PHILLIP MATTHEW —
18795852 METHODS OF TREATING A RAS PROTEIN-RELATED DISEASE OR DISORDER CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S —
18771135 METHODS OF TREATING A RAS RELATED DISEASE OR DISORDER SANCHEZ, JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER —
18591721 RAS INHIBITORS MCDOWELL, BRIAN E —
18479500 METHODS FOR INHIBITING RAS LADD, CAROLYN LOUISE —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Revolution Medicines, Inc. 7

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16253
16223
16241

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19308717 RAS INHIBITORS Revolution Medicines, Inc. RZECZYCKI, PHILLIP MATTHEW 1625 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 25, 2025
18795852 METHODS OF TREATING A RAS PROTEIN-RELATED DISEASE OR DISORDER Revolution Medicines, Inc. CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S 1625 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 06, 2024
18771135 METHODS OF TREATING A RAS RELATED DISEASE OR DISORDER Revolution Medicines, Inc. SANCHEZ, JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER 1622 §102§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 12, 2024
18634246 SYNTHESIS OF RAS INHIBITORS Revolution Medicines, Inc. CHAO, ALLEN 1622 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 12, 2024
18591721 RAS INHIBITORS Revolution Medicines, Inc. MCDOWELL, BRIAN E 1624 §112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 29, 2024
18479500 METHODS FOR INHIBITING RAS Revolution Medicines, Inc. LADD, CAROLYN LOUISE 1622 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 02, 2023
18011454 METHODS FOR DELAYING, PREVENTING, AND TREATING ACQUIRED RESISTANCE TO RAS INHIBITORS Revolution Medicines, Inc. CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S 1625 §103 Final Rejection 132d overdue Pending Dec 19, 2022

Managing Clark+Elbing LLP - Revolution Medicines, Inc.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Clark+Elbing LLP - Revolution Medicines, Inc.'s patent allowance rate?

67.8% of resolved applications prosecuted by Clark+Elbing LLP - Revolution Medicines, Inc. were allowed, across 9,010 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Clark+Elbing LLP - Revolution Medicines, Inc. average before allowance?

3.89 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Clark+Elbing LLP - Revolution Medicines, Inc. have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 1 client, before 6 examiners in 3 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month