Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Clark+Elbing LLP - Revolution Medicines, Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

7 pending office actions • 1 client • 6 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Clark+Elbing LLP - Revolution Medicines, Inc. is active in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area, currently managing 5 pending office actions. This client-specific work is a subset of the firm's 8984 career applications. The 5 pending office actions show the firm's ongoing commitment to this sector. The firm's total of 8984 career applications provides the context for their expertise in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals.

A resolved allowance rate of 67.87 percent is maintained by the firm, based on its 8984 career applications. This 67.87 percent rate is a key performance metric for their patent prosecution services. The firm averages 3.89 office actions per allowance, which informs the expected prosecution path for new filings. Practitioners can use this 3.89 average to plan for the number of examiner interactions. With 5 pending office actions, the firm continues to apply its 67.87 percent allowance rate and 3.89 office action average to its current docket. These figures summarize the firm's historical results and present workload.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=8984 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

67.9%
Allowance Rate
n=8984
+0.62σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=8984
3.9
OAs to Allowance
n=3678
-0.04σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=3678
1175 days
Time to Allowance
n=3678
+28.3pp
Interview Lift
n=8984
27.7%
RCE Rate
n=8984
1.1%
Appeal Rate
n=8984

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

76.2%
§101 Overcome
n=580
72.5%
§102 Overcome
n=1801
71.2%
§103 Overcome
n=2611
75.6%
§112 Overcome
n=2961

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61P, C07K
Top CPC Subclasses
49%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=8984
5
Practitioners
n=8984
1796.8
Apps / Practitioner
n=8984

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (29%)
3
Medium (43%)
2
Easy (29%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (43%)
§112 only1 (14%)
Double-patenting only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
71% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
29% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S 2 72.7% +18.3%
RZECZYCKI, PHILLIP MATTHEW 1 64.8% +37.0%
SANCHEZ, JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER 1 88.7% +10.2%
CHAO, ALLEN 1 55.6% +0.0%
MCDOWELL, BRIAN E 1 74.1% +30.8%
LADD, CAROLYN LOUISE 1 58.6% +47.1%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18771135 METHODS OF TREATING A RAS RELATED DISEASE OR DISORDER SANCHEZ, JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER —
18479500 METHODS FOR INHIBITING RAS LADD, CAROLYN LOUISE —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18011454 METHODS FOR DELAYING, PREVENTING, AND TREATING ACQUIRED RESISTANCE TO RAS INHIBITORS CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S 132d overdue
19308717 RAS INHIBITORS RZECZYCKI, PHILLIP MATTHEW —
18795852 METHODS OF TREATING A RAS PROTEIN-RELATED DISEASE OR DISORDER CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S —
18771135 METHODS OF TREATING A RAS RELATED DISEASE OR DISORDER SANCHEZ, JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER —
18591721 RAS INHIBITORS MCDOWELL, BRIAN E —
18479500 METHODS FOR INHIBITING RAS LADD, CAROLYN LOUISE —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Revolution Medicines, Inc. 7

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16252
16222
16241

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19308717 RAS INHIBITORS Revolution Medicines, Inc. RZECZYCKI, PHILLIP MATTHEW 1625 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 25, 2025
18795852 METHODS OF TREATING A RAS PROTEIN-RELATED DISEASE OR DISORDER Revolution Medicines, Inc. CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 06, 2024
18771135 METHODS OF TREATING A RAS RELATED DISEASE OR DISORDER Revolution Medicines, Inc. SANCHEZ, JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER §102§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 12, 2024
18634246 SYNTHESIS OF RAS INHIBITORS Revolution Medicines, Inc. CHAO, ALLEN 1622 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 12, 2024
18591721 RAS INHIBITORS Revolution Medicines, Inc. MCDOWELL, BRIAN E 1624 §112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 29, 2024
18479500 METHODS FOR INHIBITING RAS Revolution Medicines, Inc. LADD, CAROLYN LOUISE 1622 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 02, 2023
18011454 METHODS FOR DELAYING, PREVENTING, AND TREATING ACQUIRED RESISTANCE TO RAS INHIBITORS Revolution Medicines, Inc. CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S 1625 §103 Final Rejection 132d overdue Pending Dec 19, 2022

Managing Clark+Elbing LLP - Revolution Medicines, Inc.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month