Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 08, 2026

Cotman Ip Law Group, Aplc

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 5 clients • 5 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Cotman IP Law Group, APLC has a history in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area, with 461 career applications. The firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate of 91.03 percent, indicating the success rate in securing patent grants for its clients. This percentage serves as a performance indicator for the firm's results in this technical domain.

The firm currently manages 3 pending office actions, reflecting its ongoing prosecution work. On average, the firm receives 3.46 office actions per allowance. This average of 3.46 provides an expectation for the duration and intensity of the examination process. With 461 career applications and a 91.03 percent allowance rate, the firm demonstrates performance in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. These figures provide a look at the firm's capacity and its track record in mechanical patent law. The 3 pending office actions represent the firm's current workload.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=461 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

91.0%
Allowance Rate
n=461
+0.73σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=461
3.5
OAs to Allowance
n=345
-0.28σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=345
1005 days
Time to Allowance
n=345
+2.7pp
Interview Lift
n=461
29.0%
RCE Rate
n=461
0.8%
Appeal Rate
n=461

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

82.5%
§101 Overcome
n=57
85.9%
§102 Overcome
n=128
84.8%
§103 Overcome
n=210
85.8%
§112 Overcome
n=176

Specialization & Scale

A61K, G06F, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
16%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=461
0
Practitioners
n=461
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=461 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (80%)
1
Medium (20%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (80%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
2
Business / Other
40% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AUGUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER L 1 78.1% +14.1%
CLEMENTE, ROBERT ARTHUR 1 80.9% +7.2%
MARCETICH, ADAM M 1 72.7% +18.9%
CONNELL, JENNIFER PETSCHE 1 28.6% +41.5%
MERLINO, ALYSON MARIE 1 64.6% +31.2%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17520641 DENTAL LASING DEVICE SYSTEM AND METHOD CONNELL, JENNIFER PETSCHE 77d overdue
19220903 MODULAR COMPUTING-DEVICE ACCESSORIES AUGUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER L —
18438397 EFFICIENT LOW-PRESSURE DROP SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CAPTURING CARBON CLEMENTE, ROBERT ARTHUR —
15296044 REUSABLE SAFETY FITTING AND METHOD OF USING THE SAME MERLINO, ALYSON MARIE —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17520641 DENTAL LASING DEVICE SYSTEM AND METHOD CONNELL, JENNIFER PETSCHE 77d overdue
18117389 NONINVASIVE UNISEX EXTERNAL CATHETER MARCETICH, ADAM M 56d
19220903 MODULAR COMPUTING-DEVICE ACCESSORIES AUGUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER L —
15296044 REUSABLE SAFETY FITTING AND METHOD OF USING THE SAME MERLINO, ALYSON MARIE —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37811
37721
36751

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19220903 MODULAR COMPUTING-DEVICE ACCESSORIES Mobile Pixels Inc. AUGUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER L §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 28, 2025
18438397 EFFICIENT LOW-PRESSURE DROP SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CAPTURING CARBON Harrison Rice CLEMENTE, ROBERT ARTHUR §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 09, 2024
18117389 NONINVASIVE UNISEX EXTERNAL CATHETER Drysense MARCETICH, ADAM M 3781 §103 Non-Final OA 56d Pending Mar 03, 2023
17520641 DENTAL LASING DEVICE SYSTEM AND METHOD Millennium Healthcare Technologies, Inc. CONNELL, JENNIFER PETSCHE 3772 §103§112 Final Rejection 77d overdue Pending Nov 06, 2021
15296044 REUSABLE SAFETY FITTING AND METHOD OF USING THE SAME Robert Kegley MERLINO, ALYSON MARIE 3675 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 18, 2016

Managing Cotman Ip Law Group, Aplc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Cotman Ip Law Group, Aplc's patent allowance rate?

91.0% of resolved applications prosecuted by Cotman Ip Law Group, Aplc were allowed, across 461 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Cotman Ip Law Group, Aplc average before allowance?

3.46 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Cotman Ip Law Group, Aplc have?

5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 5 examiners in 3 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month