Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Cozen O''Connor - Sea Patent

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

18 pending office actions • 10 clients • 16 examiners • 13 art units • 0 of 18 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 41 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Cozen O'Connor - SEA Patent handles Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering matters. The profile includes 20 pending office actions and 19456 career applications, linking a focused current docket to the firm's broad historical application record.

The resolved allowance rate is 85.66%, with an average of 3.35 office actions per allowance. These figures indicate a strong allowance outcome within the recorded portfolio, while also showing that resolution commonly involves multiple examination exchanges. Practitioners should use the firm-level history as context and evaluate device claims and procedural posture matter by matter.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=19456 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

85.7%
Allowance Rate
n=19456
+0.54σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=19456
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=12817
-0.03σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=12817
1067 days
Time to Allowance
n=12817
+4.9pp
Interview Lift
n=19456
24.9%
RCE Rate
n=19456
2.2%
Appeal Rate
n=19456

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

77.7%
§101 Overcome
n=1370
78.5%
§102 Overcome
n=5625
80.2%
§103 Overcome
n=8950
82.4%
§112 Overcome
n=5891

Specialization & Scale

H04W, H04L, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
11%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=19456
0
Practitioners
n=19456
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=19456 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

18
Total Pending OAs
11
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

13
Hard (72%)
4
Medium (22%)
1
Easy (6%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (6%)
§101 + other2 (11%)
§103 only3 (17%)
§112 only1 (6%)
Double-patenting + other1 (6%)
Multi-statute (no §101)10 (56%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
6% of docket
1
Information Tech
6% of docket
1
Communications
6% of docket
1
Semiconductors
6% of docket
14
Mechanical / Eng
78% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

180 h
Manual time on pending OAs
36 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
63 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BARKER, MATTHEW M 2 72.7% +15.0%
PRONE, CHRISTOPHER D 2 64.9% +19.1%
XAVIER, VALENTINA 1 74.9% +8.4%
AZHAR, ARSLAN 1 78.7% +20.1%
YANKEY, RYAN ANDREW 1 77.8% +14.3%
SCHWARTZ, JOSHUA L 1 68.3% +21.5%
YANG, ANDREW 1 84.3% +10.4%
COCHRAN, KARI LEE 1 100.0% +0.0%
TRAVERS, MATTHEW P 1 63.3% +43.3%
SIPP, AMY R. 1 71.1% +26.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18783631 Tibial Tray Suture Fixation COCHRAN, KARI LEE —

Hard Cases (13)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18407184 Integrative System and Method for Performing Medical Diagnosis Using Artificial Intelligence MPAMUGO, CHINYERE 45d overdue
18390855 Battery Control Systems and Methods TRISCHLER, JOHN T 26d overdue
17862691 MANUFACTURING METHODS AND RELATED STRUCTURES, FOR EXAMPLE USEFUL IN AIRFRAMES AND OTHER STRUCTURES LAN, YAN 23d overdue
19106847 FLUID STORAGE MONITORING BARKER, MATTHEW M 53d
19115689 DRY-BULK STOCKPILE MONITORING BARKER, MATTHEW M —
18879476 SATELLITE THERMAL CONTROL YANKEY, RYAN ANDREW —
18933881 DYNAMIC PROFILE SWITCHING SCHWARTZ, JOSHUA L —
18845568 PATIENT SPECIFIC TOTAL TALUS FOR TOTAL ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY YANG, ANDREW —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19106847 FLUID STORAGE MONITORING BARKER, MATTHEW M 53d
19115689 DRY-BULK STOCKPILE MONITORING BARKER, MATTHEW M —
19102069 AUTOMATED CONFIGURATION OF ROBOTS IN MULTI-ROBOT OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT OPTIMIZING FOR WEAR AND OTHER PARAMETERS AZHAR, ARSLAN —
18879476 SATELLITE THERMAL CONTROL YANKEY, RYAN ANDREW —
18933881 DYNAMIC PROFILE SWITCHING SCHWARTZ, JOSHUA L —
18845568 PATIENT SPECIFIC TOTAL TALUS FOR TOTAL ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY YANG, ANDREW —
18729021 CONDUCTOR BUNDLE SEPARATION DEVICE AND CONDUCTOR BUNDLE SEPARATION METHOD TRAVERS, MATTHEW P —
18727371 Total Ankle Replacement Alignment Reference Wing and Sizing Guides SIPP, AMY R. —

Client Portfolio (10 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37744
36462
37752
36421
36561
36441
26491
37251
36851
28591

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19486747 HIGH-ALTITUDE, UNMANNED AIRCRAFT FOR EARTH OBSERVATION Iceye OY XAVIER, VALENTINA 3642 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 21, 2025
19115689 DRY-BULK STOCKPILE MONITORING Iceye OY BARKER, MATTHEW M 3646 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 26, 2025
19106847 FLUID STORAGE MONITORING Iceye OY BARKER, MATTHEW M 3646 §101§102§103 Final Rejection 53d Pending Feb 26, 2025
19102069 AUTOMATED CONFIGURATION OF ROBOTS IN MULTI-ROBOT OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT OPTIMIZING FOR WEAR AND OTHER PARAMETERS Realtime Robotics, Inc. AZHAR, ARSLAN 3656 §102DP Final Rejection — Pending Feb 07, 2025
18879476 SATELLITE THERMAL CONTROL Iceye OY YANKEY, RYAN ANDREW 3644 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 27, 2024
18933881 DYNAMIC PROFILE SWITCHING Cubic Telecom Limited SCHWARTZ, JOSHUA L 2649 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 31, 2024
18845568 PATIENT SPECIFIC TOTAL TALUS FOR TOTAL ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY Arthrex, Inc. YANG, ANDREW 3775 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 10, 2024
18783631 Tibial Tray Suture Fixation Arthrex, Inc. COCHRAN, KARI LEE 3774 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 25, 2024
18729021 CONDUCTOR BUNDLE SEPARATION DEVICE AND CONDUCTOR BUNDLE SEPARATION METHOD Eishin Technology Co., Ltd. TRAVERS, MATTHEW P 3725 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 15, 2024
18727371 Total Ankle Replacement Alignment Reference Wing and Sizing Guides Arthrex, Inc. SIPP, AMY R. 3775 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 09, 2024
18715312 Canine Unicompartimental Elbow Humeral Implant Arthrex, Inc. PRONE, CHRISTOPHER D 3774 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 31, 2024
18714218 Anatomical Talar Component Design for Total Ankle Replacement Arthrex, Inc. HIGHLAND, RACHEL S 3774 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 29, 2024
18714183 Fixation Methods for Total Ankle Arthroplasty Arthrex, Inc. PRONE, CHRISTOPHER D 3774 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 29, 2024
18407184 Integrative System and Method for Performing Medical Diagnosis Using Artificial Intelligence Ayur.Ai Private Limited MPAMUGO, CHINYERE 3685 §101 Final Rejection 45d overdue Pending Jan 08, 2024
18390855 Battery Control Systems and Methods Exro Technologies Inc. TRISCHLER, JOHN T 2859 §102§103 Final Rejection 26d overdue Pending Dec 20, 2023
18541472 DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INTERNET OF THINGS DEVICES BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS CHOWDHURY, MAHBUBUL BAR 2475 §112 Non-Final OA 26d Pending Dec 15, 2023
17862691 MANUFACTURING METHODS AND RELATED STRUCTURES, FOR EXAMPLE USEFUL IN AIRFRAMES AND OTHER STRUCTURES Imagine Aero Inc. LAN, YAN 1782 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 23d overdue Pending Jul 12, 2022
17851699 FLUID JET SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF USE TO ACCESS AND DISASSEMBLE COMPONENTS OF HAZARDOUS ARTICLES Shape Technologies Group, Inc. NEIBAUR, ROBERT F 3723 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 28, 2022

Managing Cozen O''Connor - Sea Patent's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Cozen O''Connor - Sea Patent's patent allowance rate?

85.7% of resolved applications prosecuted by Cozen O''Connor - Sea Patent were allowed, across 19,456 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Cozen O''Connor - Sea Patent average before allowance?

3.35 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Cozen O''Connor - Sea Patent have?

18 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 10 clients, before 16 examiners in 13 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month