Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Cp Law Group Pc

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 7 clients • 7 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

CP LAW GROUP PC operates in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. Its profile shows 7 pending office actions and 239 career applications, indicating a small current docket and a limited historical application record.

The resolved allowance rate is 73.08%, and the average is 2.05 office actions per allowance. Resolved matters often reached allowance after relatively few examination exchanges, although the outcome measure shows that allowance was not universal. Practitioners should combine this profile-level context with review of claim amendments and outstanding objections in each matter.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=239 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

73.1%
Allowance Rate
n=239
+0.25σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=239
2.0
OAs to Allowance
n=114
-0.77σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=114
734 days
Time to Allowance
n=114
+28.1pp
Interview Lift
n=239
14.1%
RCE Rate
n=239
5.7%
Appeal Rate
n=239

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=8 (min 20)
58.1%
§102 Overcome
n=74
50.0%
§103 Overcome
n=88
54.2%
§112 Overcome
n=59

Specialization & Scale

A63B, H01Q, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
16%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=239
0
Practitioners
n=239
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=239 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (43%)
4
Medium (57%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (14%)
§103 only2 (29%)
§102 only1 (14%)
Double-patenting + other1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
14% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
14% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
71% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PETERS, BRIAN O 1 72.9% +16.2%
GARCIA-GUERRA, DARLENE 1 23.2% +34.4%
LETTERMAN, CATRINA A 1 66.9% +30.8%
LEE, AHAM NMN 1 47.6% +55.6%
BEHM, HARRY RAYMOND 1 79.6% +7.3%
WHITE, DYLAN C 1 77.1% +13.3%
DO, ROWLAND 1 70.0% -5.3%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19181224 COMPUTERIZED METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AGRICULTURE SCHEDULING GARCIA-GUERRA, DARLENE —
18840732 THERMOSTABLE UV INACTIVATED VACCINES AND OTHER BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LEE, AHAM NMN —
18674848 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PORTABLE AND TEMPORARY SETUP OF PLAYING COURTS WHITE, DYLAN C —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19302079 TAPERED ROTARY DISC PUMP PETERS, BRIAN O 1d overdue
19181224 COMPUTERIZED METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AGRICULTURE SCHEDULING GARCIA-GUERRA, DARLENE —
19034551 COUNTERWEIGHTED SWING TRAINING WEIGHT DEVICE WITH INTERCHANGEABLE WEIGHTS LETTERMAN, CATRINA A —
18840732 THERMOSTABLE UV INACTIVATED VACCINES AND OTHER BIOPHARMACEUTICALS LEE, AHAM NMN —
18674848 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PORTABLE AND TEMPORARY SETUP OF PLAYING COURTS WHITE, DYLAN C —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36252
37111
37841
17581
28381
36771

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19302079 TAPERED ROTARY DISC PUMP Discflo Corporation PETERS, BRIAN O 3711 §103 Final Rejection 1d overdue Pending Aug 18, 2025
19181224 COMPUTERIZED METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AGRICULTURE SCHEDULING Palomar Data Systems Inc. GARCIA-GUERRA, DARLENE 3625 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 16, 2025
19034551 COUNTERWEIGHTED SWING TRAINING WEIGHT DEVICE WITH INTERCHANGEABLE WEIGHTS D & D Devices, Inc. LETTERMAN, CATRINA A 3784 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 22, 2025
18840732 THERMOSTABLE UV INACTIVATED VACCINES AND OTHER BIOPHARMACEUTICALS Universal Stabilization Technologies Inc. LEE, AHAM NMN 1758 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 22, 2024
18730776 INTEGRATED POWER BLOCK Moksha Integrated Power LLC BEHM, HARRY RAYMOND 2838 §103 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Jul 21, 2024
18674848 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PORTABLE AND TEMPORARY SETUP OF PLAYING COURTS Anywhere Pickleball LLC WHITE, DYLAN C 3625 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 25, 2024
18669918 LOCKING MECHANISM Southpac Trust International Inc. DO, ROWLAND 3677 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending May 21, 2024

Managing Cp Law Group Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Cp Law Group Pc's patent allowance rate?

73.1% of resolved applications prosecuted by Cp Law Group Pc were allowed, across 239 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Cp Law Group Pc average before allowance?

2.05 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Cp Law Group Pc have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 7 clients, before 7 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month