Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
6 pending office actions • 5 clients • 6 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 31 patents granted in the last 365 days
DAVID AND RAYMOND PATENT FIRM has 6 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and 3520 career applications. The current workload is limited relative to a substantial historical application record.
The resolved allowance rate is 85.31%, with an average of 2.27 office actions per allowance. The available record shows allowance in most resolved cases, with successful matters generally reaching resolution after more than two examination actions.
Practitioners can use these figures to balance outcome expectations with process planning. The application history indicates meaningful experience, while the action average supports budgeting for focused but potentially iterative prosecution work.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (17%) |
| §112 only | 2 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (33%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (17%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KUMAR, RAKESH | 1 | 57.2% | +28.2% |
| STUMPFOLL, DANA LYNN | 1 | 54.1% | +43.9% |
| CALLISON, KEIRA EILEEN | 1 | 21.7% | +85.7% |
| DUDA, RINA I | 1 | 80.2% | +10.2% |
| YOO, REGINA M | 1 | 63.8% | +5.8% |
| OJOFEITIMI, AYODEJI HARRY | 1 | 88.4% | -1.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18225110 | Three-Phase Digital Power Inverter System for Motor Controlling | DUDA, RINA I | 20d |
| 18108608 | Dispenser Apparatus for Detachable Shoe Covers and Method Thereof | OJOFEITIMI, AYODEJI HARRY | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18937020 | Shoe Cover Dispenser Device | KUMAR, RAKESH | — |
| 18525192 | Therapy Device with Cold-Heat Exchange Structure | STUMPFOLL, DANA LYNN | — |
| 18502700 | Non-contact driven air wave massage device | CALLISON, KEIRA EILEEN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18225110 | Three-Phase Digital Power Inverter System for Motor Controlling | DUDA, RINA I | 20d |
| 18937020 | Shoe Cover Dispenser Device | KUMAR, RAKESH | — |
| 18525192 | Therapy Device with Cold-Heat Exchange Structure | STUMPFOLL, DANA LYNN | — |
| 18502700 | Non-contact driven air wave massage device | CALLISON, KEIRA EILEEN | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Oto Industry (Wuhan) Co., Ltd. | 2 |
| Odeco Ltd. | 1 |
| Mylovey Limited | 1 |
| Milo Enterprises | 1 |
| Shi Ping Wang | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3651 | 2 |
| 3794 | 1 |
| 3785 | 1 |
| 2846 | 1 |
| 1758 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18937020 | Shoe Cover Dispenser Device | Oto Industry (Wuhan) Co., Ltd. | KUMAR, RAKESH | 3651 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 05, 2024 |
| 18525192 | Therapy Device with Cold-Heat Exchange Structure | Odeco Ltd. | STUMPFOLL, DANA LYNN | 3794 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 30, 2023 |
| 18502700 | Non-contact driven air wave massage device | Mylovey Limited | CALLISON, KEIRA EILEEN | 3785 | Other | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 06, 2023 |
| 18225110 | Three-Phase Digital Power Inverter System for Motor Controlling | Milo Enterprises Inc. | DUDA, RINA I | 2846 | §112 | Final Rejection | 20d | Pending | Jul 22, 2023 |
| 18204945 | Circuit Control Method of Induction Trash Can with Cold Cathode Ultraviolet Lamp Deodorization | Shi Ping Wang | YOO, REGINA M | 1758 | §112Other | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 02, 2023 |
| 18108608 | Dispenser Apparatus for Detachable Shoe Covers and Method Thereof | Oto Industry (Wuhan) Co., Ltd. | OJOFEITIMI, AYODEJI HARRY | 3651 | §102Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 11, 2023 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial85.3% of resolved applications prosecuted by David And Raymond Patent Firm were allowed, across 3,520 applications in USPTO records.
2.27 office actions per allowed application on average.
6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 6 examiners in 5 art units.
