Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
6 pending office actions • 5 clients • 6 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 29 patents granted in the last 365 days
DAVID AND RAYMOND PATENT FIRM is a patent law firm that has handled 3519 career applications. The firm specializes in Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics. It maintains a resolved allowance rate pct of 85.3. This performance is achieved with an avg office actions per allowance of 2.27. The firm currently has 5 pending office actions.
The avg office actions per allowance of 2.27 is an indicator of efficiency in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. Reaching an allowance in several office actions on average suggests an effective prosecution strategy. This efficiency is paired with a resolved allowance rate pct of 85.3 across 3519 career applications. The 5 pending office actions show a low current workload. For practitioners, these metrics suggest a firm that is capable of delivering results for a large number of patent filings. The firm's 3519 career applications establish its experience in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (17%) |
| §102 only | 1 (17%) |
| §112 only | 1 (17%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KUMAR, RAKESH | 1 | 57.2% | +28.2% |
| STUMPFOLL, DANA LYNN | 1 | 53.3% | +43.1% |
| DUDA, RINA I | 1 | 80.2% | +10.1% |
| ABRAMS, NEIL | 1 | 82.8% | +12.4% |
| OJOFEITIMI, AYODEJI HARRY | 1 | 89.2% | +3.9% |
| RODRIGUEZ, JOSEPH C | 1 | 78.4% | +15.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18225110 | Three-Phase Digital Power Inverter System for Motor Controlling | DUDA, RINA I | 20d |
| 18037767 | Type-C Receptacle Load-Bearing Docking Protection Device | ABRAMS, NEIL | — |
| 18108608 | Dispenser Apparatus for Detachable Shoe Covers and Method Thereof | OJOFEITIMI, AYODEJI HARRY | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18937020 | Shoe Cover Dispenser Device | KUMAR, RAKESH | — |
| 18525192 | Therapy Device with Cold-Heat Exchange Structure | STUMPFOLL, DANA LYNN | — |
| 18015052 | PHARMACY ROBOT DEVICE, METHOD AND SYSTEM THEREOF | RODRIGUEZ, JOSEPH C | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18225110 | Three-Phase Digital Power Inverter System for Motor Controlling | DUDA, RINA I | 20d |
| 18937020 | Shoe Cover Dispenser Device | KUMAR, RAKESH | — |
| 18525192 | Therapy Device with Cold-Heat Exchange Structure | STUMPFOLL, DANA LYNN | — |
| 18037767 | Type-C Receptacle Load-Bearing Docking Protection Device | ABRAMS, NEIL | — |
| 18015052 | PHARMACY ROBOT DEVICE, METHOD AND SYSTEM THEREOF | RODRIGUEZ, JOSEPH C | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Oto Industry (Wuhan) Co., Ltd. | 2 |
| Odeco Ltd. | 1 |
| Milo Enterprises | 1 |
| Shenzhen Merrtek Technology Co., Ltd. | 1 |
| Xiamen Brana Design Co., Ltd. | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3794 | 1 |
| 2846 | 1 |
| 2834 | 1 |
| 3651 | 1 |
| 1685 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18937020 | Shoe Cover Dispenser Device | Oto Industry (Wuhan) Co., Ltd. | KUMAR, RAKESH | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 05, 2024 | |
| 18525192 | Therapy Device with Cold-Heat Exchange Structure | Odeco Ltd. | STUMPFOLL, DANA LYNN | 3794 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 30, 2023 |
| 18225110 | Three-Phase Digital Power Inverter System for Motor Controlling | Milo Enterprises Inc. | DUDA, RINA I | 2846 | §112 | Final Rejection | 20d | Pending | Jul 22, 2023 |
| 18037767 | Type-C Receptacle Load-Bearing Docking Protection Device | Shenzhen Merrtek Technology Co., Ltd. | ABRAMS, NEIL | 2834 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 18, 2023 |
| 18108608 | Dispenser Apparatus for Detachable Shoe Covers and Method Thereof | Oto Industry (Wuhan) Co., Ltd. | OJOFEITIMI, AYODEJI HARRY | 3651 | §102Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 11, 2023 |
| 18015052 | PHARMACY ROBOT DEVICE, METHOD AND SYSTEM THEREOF | Xiamen Brana Design Co., Ltd. | RODRIGUEZ, JOSEPH C | 1685 | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 06, 2023 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial