Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

12 pending office actions • 8 clients • 11 examiners • 10 art units • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP has 14 pending office actions in Networking & Security and 342 career applications. The current docket represents active examination work within a comparatively focused application record.

The resolved allowance rate is 82.66%, and the average is 3.78 office actions per allowance. Most resolved matters reach allowance, but successful cases generally involve multiple Office actions and sustained prosecution effort.

For clients, the profile offers a basis for planning both workload and expectations. The application history shows relevant experience, while the action average suggests that claim refinement and examiner engagement may continue well beyond the initial response.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=342 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

82.7%
Allowance Rate
n=342
+0.44σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=342
3.8
OAs to Allowance
n=205
+0.12σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=205
1175 days
Time to Allowance
n=205
+14.4pp
Interview Lift
n=342
33.9%
RCE Rate
n=342
8.0%
Appeal Rate
n=342

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

69.8%
§101 Overcome
n=53
73.3%
§102 Overcome
n=101
73.1%
§103 Overcome
n=175
68.8%
§112 Overcome
n=109

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04N, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
28%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=342
2
Practitioners
n=342
171.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=342

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (50%)
5
Medium (42%)
1
Easy (8%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (8%)
§103 only3 (25%)
§102 only1 (8%)
Double-patenting only1 (8%)
Double-patenting + other1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (42%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
8% of docket
5
Information Tech
42% of docket
2
Communications
17% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DOSHI, AKSHAY 2 64.0% +39.8%
MENDEZ MUNIZ, DYLAN JOHN 1 80.8% +25.0%
PARK, JEONG S 1 80.7% +20.4%
MATHEW, SEEMA 1 71.6% +26.1%
PATTERSON, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER 1 48.6% +39.3%
SCHWARTZ, KEVIN EDWARD 1 51.7% +39.6%
HARANDI, SIAMAK 1 90.4% +8.0%
DHAKAD, RUPALI 1 41.5% +28.2%
WOZNICKI, JACQUELINE 1 49.8% +26.2%
VYAS, KEYUR ANILKUMAR 1 50.0% +58.7%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18656663 PREDICTIVE DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION SYSTEM HARANDI, SIAMAK 65d
18896486 ADVANCED INTELLIGENCE ENGINE PARK, JEONG S —

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18226461 Facial Recognition Filter for Restricting Access to Photographs DHAKAD, RUPALI 28d
18982178 MULTISPECTRAL CAMOUFLAGE TESTING AND DEFEAT CAPABILITY MENDEZ MUNIZ, DYLAN JOHN —
18798576 SELF-ASSEMBLING MODULAR PERCUTANEOUS VALVE AND METHODS OF FOLDING, ASSEMBLY AND DELIVERY MATHEW, SEEMA —
18759575 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RESEALING SEALANT CONTAINERS PATTERSON, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER —
18202165 MANAGING ADDRESSABLE ASSET CAMPAIGNS ACROSS MULTIPLE DEVICES DOSHI, AKSHAY —
18098287 MODULAR PERCUTANEOUS VALVE STRUCTURE AND DELIVERY METHOD WOZNICKI, JACQUELINE —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18226461 Facial Recognition Filter for Restricting Access to Photographs DHAKAD, RUPALI 28d
18982178 MULTISPECTRAL CAMOUFLAGE TESTING AND DEFEAT CAPABILITY MENDEZ MUNIZ, DYLAN JOHN —
18896486 ADVANCED INTELLIGENCE ENGINE PARK, JEONG S —
18798576 SELF-ASSEMBLING MODULAR PERCUTANEOUS VALVE AND METHODS OF FOLDING, ASSEMBLY AND DELIVERY MATHEW, SEEMA —
18759575 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RESEALING SEALANT CONTAINERS PATTERSON, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER —
18742933 FIRE SUPPRESSANT AGENT CONTAINER SYSTEM WITH PASSIVE COOLING SCHWARTZ, KEVIN EDWARD —
18202165 MANAGING ADDRESSABLE ASSET CAMPAIGNS ACROSS MULTIPLE DEVICES DOSHI, AKSHAY —
18098287 MODULAR PERCUTANEOUS VALVE STRUCTURE AND DELIVERY METHOD WOZNICKI, JACQUELINE —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37742
24222
26751
24171
37541
37521
26621
24371
16371
24321

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18982178 MULTISPECTRAL CAMOUFLAGE TESTING AND DEFEAT CAPABILITY Hunamis, LLC MENDEZ MUNIZ, DYLAN JOHN 2675 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 16, 2024
18896486 ADVANCED INTELLIGENCE ENGINE Logrhythm, Inc. PARK, JEONG S 2417 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 25, 2024
18798576 SELF-ASSEMBLING MODULAR PERCUTANEOUS VALVE AND METHODS OF FOLDING, ASSEMBLY AND DELIVERY Valve Medical Ltd. MATHEW, SEEMA 3774 §102§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 08, 2024
18759575 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RESEALING SEALANT CONTAINERS Sashco, Inc. PATTERSON, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER 3754 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 28, 2024
18742933 FIRE SUPPRESSANT AGENT CONTAINER SYSTEM WITH PASSIVE COOLING Williams Fire & Hazard, LLC SCHWARTZ, KEVIN EDWARD 3752 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 13, 2024
18656663 PREDICTIVE DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION SYSTEM Hunamis, LLC HARANDI, SIAMAK 2662 §103 Non-Final OA 65d Pending May 07, 2024
18226461 Facial Recognition Filter for Restricting Access to Photographs Geosnapshot Pty Ltd. DHAKAD, RUPALI 2437 §101§103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Jul 26, 2023
18202165 MANAGING ADDRESSABLE ASSET CAMPAIGNS ACROSS MULTIPLE DEVICES Invidi Technologies Corporation DOSHI, AKSHAY 2422 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 25, 2023
18098287 MODULAR PERCUTANEOUS VALVE STRUCTURE AND DELIVERY METHOD Valve Medical Ltd. WOZNICKI, JACQUELINE 3774 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 18, 2023
17531297 RNA STABILIZATION Team Medical LLC VYAS, KEYUR ANILKUMAR 1637 §102§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 19, 2021
17452161 CLOUD-BASED DECISIONING FOR ADDRESSABLE ASSET SYSTEM Invidi Technologies Corporation DOSHI, AKSHAY 2422 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 25, 2021
16165877 GENERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF IDENTITY PROFILES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF SECURITY RESPONSE Logrhythm, Inc. POPHAM, JEFFREY D 2432 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 19, 2018

Managing Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP's patent allowance rate?

82.7% of resolved applications prosecuted by Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP were allowed, across 342 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP average before allowance?

3.78 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP have?

12 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 8 clients, before 11 examiners in 10 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month