Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Dinsmore & Shohl LLP - Intuit

8 pending office actions • 3 clients • 8 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 40 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=34495 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

85.5%
Allowance Rate
n=34495
+0.57σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=34495
3.1
OAs to Allowance
n=21370
-0.29σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=21370
1002 days
Time to Allowance
n=21370
+7.1pp
Interview Lift
n=34495
22.1%
RCE Rate
n=34495
3.8%
Appeal Rate
n=34495

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

67.8%
§101 Overcome
n=2591
78.4%
§102 Overcome
n=9196
78.6%
§103 Overcome
n=14836
80.9%
§112 Overcome
n=9524

Specialization & Scale

G06F, A61B, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
8%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=34495
69
Practitioners
n=34495
499.9
Apps / Practitioner
n=34495

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (62%)
3
Medium (38%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (12%)
§101 + other4 (50%)
§103 only3 (38%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
25% of docket
3
Communications
38% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
1
Business / Other
12% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ABDULLAEV, AMANULLA 1 22.9% +32.9%
MORRISON, JAY A 1 81.0% +23.9%
UNDERWOOD, BAKARI 1 69.4% +17.6%
SHAIKH, ZEESHAN MAHMOOD 1 51.3% +53.9%
SMITH, SEAN THOMAS 1 72.7% +37.5%
TENGBUMROONG, NATHAN NARA 1 43.5% +31.1%
COLEMAN, PAUL 1 66.7% +42.9%
ROY, SANCHITA 1 72.3% +46.1%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18763842 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRIP CLASSIFICATION UNDERWOOD, BAKARI 5d
18744434 SMART DISPATCHER IN A COMPOSITE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) SYSTEM SHAIKH, ZEESHAN MAHMOOD 9d
19096412 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VEHICULAR COLLISION RECONSTRUCTION ABDULLAEV, AMANULLA
18791185 ADAPTIVE INFORMATION RETRIEVAL UTILIZING SEMANTIC AND LEXICAL SCORING MORRISON, JAY A
18372660 EXPERT FEEDBACK LOOP FOR RESOLVING AMBIGUITY ROY, SANCHITA

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18424572 SLANG USAGE DETECTION AND MITIGATION FOR LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS TENGBUMROONG, NATHAN NARA 49d overdue
18429131 SEARCHING PROGRAMMING CODE REPOSITORIES USING LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS SMITH, SEAN THOMAS 4d overdue
18763842 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRIP CLASSIFICATION UNDERWOOD, BAKARI 5d
18744434 SMART DISPATCHER IN A COMPOSITE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) SYSTEM SHAIKH, ZEESHAN MAHMOOD 9d
19096412 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VEHICULAR COLLISION RECONSTRUCTION ABDULLAEV, AMANULLA
18791185 ADAPTIVE INFORMATION RETRIEVAL UTILIZING SEMANTIC AND LEXICAL SCORING MORRISON, JAY A
18496496 DOMAIN-SPECIFIC PROMPT PROCESSING AND ANSWERING VIA LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PLANNERS COLEMAN, PAUL
18372660 EXPERT FEEDBACK LOOP FOR RESOLVING AMBIGUITY ROY, SANCHITA

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
INTUIT INC. 5
Credit Karma 2
Intuit 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36611
21511
36631
26581
26591
26541
41001
21461

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19096412 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VEHICULAR COLLISION RECONSTRUCTION Credit Karma, LLC ABDULLAEV, AMANULLA 3661 §101§103 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 31, 2025
18791185 ADAPTIVE INFORMATION RETRIEVAL UTILIZING SEMANTIC AND LEXICAL SCORING Intuit Inc. MORRISON, JAY A 2151 §101 Final Rejection Pending Jul 31, 2024
18763842 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRIP CLASSIFICATION Credit Karma, LLC UNDERWOOD, BAKARI 3663 §101§102DP Non-Final OA 5d Pending Jul 03, 2024
18744434 SMART DISPATCHER IN A COMPOSITE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) SYSTEM Intuit, Inc. SHAIKH, ZEESHAN MAHMOOD 2658 §101§103 Final Rejection 9d Pending Jun 14, 2024
18429131 SEARCHING PROGRAMMING CODE REPOSITORIES USING LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS Intuit, Inc. SMITH, SEAN THOMAS 2659 §103 Non-Final OA 4d overdue Pending Jan 31, 2024
18424572 SLANG USAGE DETECTION AND MITIGATION FOR LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS Intuit, Inc. TENGBUMROONG, NATHAN NARA 2654 §103 Final Rejection 49d overdue Pending Jan 26, 2024
18496496 DOMAIN-SPECIFIC PROMPT PROCESSING AND ANSWERING VIA LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PLANNERS Intuit, Inc. COLEMAN, PAUL 4100 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 27, 2023
18372660 EXPERT FEEDBACK LOOP FOR RESOLVING AMBIGUITY Intuit, Inc. ROY, SANCHITA 2146 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 25, 2023

Managing Dinsmore & Shohl LLP - Intuit's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month