Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Dla Piper LLP US - Intuit

12 pending office actions • 1 client • 12 examiners • 11 art units • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 31 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 12 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
4
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 12 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 30 days (3)Due ≤ 60 days (4)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (25%)
9
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (25%)
§103 only9 (75%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
17% of docket
5
Communications
42% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
42% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PATEL, SHREYANS A 1 88.9% +7.7%
VIG, NARESH 1 36.9% +43.9%
BEKERMAN, MICHAEL 1 32.8% +32.0%
THEIN, MARIA TERESA T 1 28.1% +30.7%
CHEN, QING 1 79.9% +52.8%
CASTILLO-TORRES, KEISHA Y 1 74.5% +29.5%
SULTANA, NADIRA 1 74.3% +30.4%
OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N 1 82.0% +10.6%
LIU, CHIA-YI 1 27.0% +21.1%
SONIFRANK, RICHA MISHRA 1 66.3% +25.0%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18498988 CONTRASTIVE IN-CONTEXT LEARNING FOR LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N 23d overdue
18767899 END-TO-END AUTOMATED LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL EVALUATION AND DEPLOYMENT PATEL, SHREYANS A 8d overdue

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18633382 VARIABLE PROCESSING WITH MACHINE LEARNING USAGE PREDICTION THEIN, MARIA TERESA T 35d overdue
18496813 AUTOMATED RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HIERARCHICAL DATA STRUCTURES LIU, CHIA-YI 9d
17815552 USING A MULTI-ARMED BANDIT APPROACH FOR BOOSTING CATEGORIZATION PERFORMANCE SALMAN, AVIA ABDULSATTAR 23d
18674736 PERSONALIZED CAMPAIGN GENERATION THROUGH DEEP CUSTOMER LEARNING BEKERMAN, MICHAEL 62d

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18633382 VARIABLE PROCESSING WITH MACHINE LEARNING USAGE PREDICTION THEIN, MARIA TERESA T 35d overdue
18498988 CONTRASTIVE IN-CONTEXT LEARNING FOR LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N 23d overdue
18478867 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANSWERING INQUIRIES USING VECTOR EMBEDDINGS AND LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS SONIFRANK, RICHA MISHRA 1d overdue
18496813 AUTOMATED RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HIERARCHICAL DATA STRUCTURES LIU, CHIA-YI 9d
18614582 LOGGING AND VISUALIZING EXECUTION FLOW IN AN LLM ENABLED USER QUERY APPLICATION CHEN, QING 22d
18674732 COLLABORATIVE COMPONENTS FRAMEWORK FOR CONTENT-BASED RECOMMENDATIONS SYSTEM VIG, NARESH 34d
18412448 AUTOMATIC INVOICE TEMPLATE GENERATION BASED ON INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INDIVIDUAL INVOICES CASTILLO-TORRES, KEISHA Y 41d
18525545 CONFIGURATION DRIVEN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING PIPELINE PROVISIONING SULTANA, NADIRA 56d

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
INTUIT INC. 12

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26592
36221
36211
36891
21911
26531
26581
36921
26541
21981

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18767899 END-TO-END AUTOMATED LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL EVALUATION AND DEPLOYMENT Intuit Inc. PATEL, SHREYANS A 2659 §103 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Jul 09, 2024
18674732 COLLABORATIVE COMPONENTS FRAMEWORK FOR CONTENT-BASED RECOMMENDATIONS SYSTEM Intuit Inc. VIG, NARESH 3622 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending May 24, 2024
18674736 PERSONALIZED CAMPAIGN GENERATION THROUGH DEEP CUSTOMER LEARNING Intuit Inc. BEKERMAN, MICHAEL 3621 §101 Final Rejection 62d Pending May 24, 2024
18633382 VARIABLE PROCESSING WITH MACHINE LEARNING USAGE PREDICTION Intuit Inc. THEIN, MARIA TERESA T 3689 §103 Non-Final OA 35d overdue Pending Apr 11, 2024
18614582 LOGGING AND VISUALIZING EXECUTION FLOW IN AN LLM ENABLED USER QUERY APPLICATION Intuit Inc. CHEN, QING 2191 §103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Mar 22, 2024
18412448 AUTOMATIC INVOICE TEMPLATE GENERATION BASED ON INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INDIVIDUAL INVOICES Intuit Inc. CASTILLO-TORRES, KEISHA Y 2659 §103 Final Rejection 41d Pending Jan 12, 2024
18525545 CONFIGURATION DRIVEN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING PIPELINE PROVISIONING Intuit Inc. SULTANA, NADIRA 2653 §103 Final Rejection 56d Pending Nov 30, 2023
18498988 CONTRASTIVE IN-CONTEXT LEARNING FOR LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS Intuit Inc. OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N 2658 §103 Non-Final OA 23d overdue Pending Oct 31, 2023
18496813 AUTOMATED RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HIERARCHICAL DATA STRUCTURES Intuit Inc. LIU, CHIA-YI 3692 §101 Non-Final OA 9d Pending Oct 27, 2023
18478867 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANSWERING INQUIRIES USING VECTOR EMBEDDINGS AND LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS Intuit Inc. SONIFRANK, RICHA MISHRA 2654 §103 Non-Final OA 1d overdue Pending Sep 29, 2023
18455595 LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL AND DETERMINISTIC CALCULATOR SYSTEMS AND METHODS Intuit Inc. MUDRICK, TIMOTHY A 2198 §103 Final Rejection 47d Pending Aug 24, 2023
17815552 USING A MULTI-ARMED BANDIT APPROACH FOR BOOSTING CATEGORIZATION PERFORMANCE Intuit Inc. SALMAN, AVIA ABDULSATTAR 3627 §101 Non-Final OA 23d Pending Jul 27, 2022

Managing Dla Piper LLP US - Intuit's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month