Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
5 pending office actions • 1 client • 4 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days
This Precision profile covers Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and reports 4 pending office actions. The associated career record contains 21180 applications, a resolved allowance rate of 84.39%, and an average of 3.7 office actions per allowance.
The historical figures describe the broader DLA Piper record associated with the profile. They indicate that a majority of resolved matters reached allowance and that allowed matters commonly required multiple examination exchanges, but they do not predict the outcome of the open Precision matters.
For practitioners, the medical-device focus supports careful analysis of structural limitations, functional language, and technical support. The small open docket can receive matter-level attention, while the broader record provides context for internal prosecution-process review.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (20%) |
| §103 only | 2 (40%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (20%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MORONESO, JONATHAN DREW | 2 | 53.1% | +34.8% |
| BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID | 1 | 36.0% | +30.0% |
| MUTCHLER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN | 1 | 55.7% | +22.7% |
| WILLIAMS, TERESA S | 1 | 25.1% | +17.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18491441 | SECURE INTERFACES FOR MEDICAL DEVICES | WILLIAMS, TERESA S | 46d overdue |
| 19075143 | NEURAL INTERFACE TECHNOLOGY FOR COMMUNICATING WITH CLINICALLY UNRESPONSIVE PATIENTS | BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID | 4d overdue |
| 18148656 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NEURAL INTERFACES | MORONESO, JONATHAN DREW | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18491441 | SECURE INTERFACES FOR MEDICAL DEVICES | WILLIAMS, TERESA S | 46d overdue |
| 19075143 | NEURAL INTERFACE TECHNOLOGY FOR COMMUNICATING WITH CLINICALLY UNRESPONSIVE PATIENTS | BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID | 4d overdue |
| 18626897 | CONFORMAL ELECTRODE ARRAYS FOR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC RECORDING AND NEURAL STIMULATION WITHIN THE CEREBRAL VENTRICLES AND CEREBRAL VASCULATURE | MUTCHLER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN | 8d |
| 18380918 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NEURAL INTERFACES | MORONESO, JONATHAN DREW | — |
| 18148656 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NEURAL INTERFACES | MORONESO, JONATHAN DREW | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Precision Neuroscience | 5 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3796 | 2 |
| 3791 | 2 |
| 3687 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19075143 | NEURAL INTERFACE TECHNOLOGY FOR COMMUNICATING WITH CLINICALLY UNRESPONSIVE PATIENTS | Precision Neuroscience Corporation | BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID | 3796 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 4d overdue | Pending | Mar 10, 2025 |
| 18626897 | CONFORMAL ELECTRODE ARRAYS FOR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC RECORDING AND NEURAL STIMULATION WITHIN THE CEREBRAL VENTRICLES AND CEREBRAL VASCULATURE | Precision Neuroscience Corporation | MUTCHLER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN | 3796 | §103 | Final Rejection | 8d | Pending | Apr 04, 2024 |
| 18491441 | SECURE INTERFACES FOR MEDICAL DEVICES | Precision Neuroscience Corporation | WILLIAMS, TERESA S | 3687 | §103Other | Non-Final OA | 46d overdue | Pending | Oct 20, 2023 |
| 18380918 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NEURAL INTERFACES | Precision Neuroscience Corporation | MORONESO, JONATHAN DREW | 3791 | §103§112DP | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 17, 2023 |
| 18148656 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NEURAL INTERFACES | Precision Neuroscience Corporation | MORONESO, JONATHAN DREW | 3791 | §102§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 30, 2022 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial84.4% of resolved applications prosecuted by Dla Piper LLP (Us) - Precision were allowed, across 21,180 applications in USPTO records.
3.70 office actions per allowed application on average.
5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 1 client, before 4 examiners in 3 art units.
