Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Dority & Manning, Pa & Societe Des Produits Nestle

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

12 pending office actions • 1 client • 11 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

DORITY & MANNING, PA & SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE has 10 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials and 28426 career applications. The record reflects ongoing prosecution in a chemistry and materials setting, with a broader application history that may include compositions, formulations, processing methods, or material properties.

The resolved allowance rate is 88.25%, and the average is 3.38 office actions per allowance. These measures provide context for evaluating prosecution outcomes across the recorded application history, while the pending-action figure identifies current work requiring attention. The data supports a combined review of active docket management and historical examination activity.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=28426 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.2%
Allowance Rate
n=28426
+0.60σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=28426
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=17513
-0.15σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=17513
1010 days
Time to Allowance
n=17513
+3.4pp
Interview Lift
n=28426
28.1%
RCE Rate
n=28426
2.8%
Appeal Rate
n=28426

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

70.8%
§101 Overcome
n=1492
77.5%
§102 Overcome
n=8516
77.4%
§103 Overcome
n=14036
78.3%
§112 Overcome
n=8032

Specialization & Scale

G06F, F05D, F01D
Top CPC Subclasses
8%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=28426
60
Practitioners
n=28426
473.8
Apps / Practitioner
n=28426

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
8
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (67%)
3
Medium (25%)
1
Easy (8%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (25%)
§112 only1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)8 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

12
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MERRIAM, ANDREW E 2 28.3% +33.9%
GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A 1 36.0% +34.9%
WATTS, JENNA A 1 48.6% +54.0%
MCNEIL, JENNIFER C 1 23.7% +20.0%
LI, CHANGQING 1 29.2% +33.1%
NGUYEN, THANH H 1 18.5% +34.3%
TRAN, LIEN THUY 1 28.7% +26.5%
JACOBSON, MICHELE LYNN 1 28.1% +33.9%
YOO, HONG THI 1 46.0% +25.3%
KERSHAW, KELLY P 1 17.7% +16.0%

Hard Cases (11)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17999237 FOAMING CREAMER KERSHAW, KELLY P 26d overdue
16462808 CREAMERS COMPOSITIONS O'HERN, BRENT T 9d overdue
18545906 AERATED CREAMERS, PACKAGED READY-TO-USE AERATED CREAMERS, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING SUCH CREAMERS WATTS, JENNA A 4d overdue
18571885 SOLUBLE COFFEE POWDER MCNEIL, JENNIFER C 12d
18694891 INCREASING HYDROLYSIS EFFICIENCY IN CEREAL PROCESS BY EMPLOYING LYTIC POLYSACCHARIDES MONOOXYGENEASE (LPMO) IN COMBINATION WITH PROTEASES GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A 34d
18255762 FAT REDUCED GROUND MUCILAGINOUS SEEDS AS AFFORDABLE BINDER TRAN, LIEN THUY 68d
18720344 A CHOCOLATE PRODUCT COMPRISING A MILK ANALOGUE PRODUCT MERRIAM, ANDREW E —
18565676 FOOD OR BEVERAGE INGREDIENT COMPOSITION LI, CHANGQING —

Interview Candidates (11)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17999237 FOAMING CREAMER KERSHAW, KELLY P 26d overdue
18545906 AERATED CREAMERS, PACKAGED READY-TO-USE AERATED CREAMERS, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING SUCH CREAMERS WATTS, JENNA A 4d overdue
18571885 SOLUBLE COFFEE POWDER MCNEIL, JENNIFER C 12d
18694891 INCREASING HYDROLYSIS EFFICIENCY IN CEREAL PROCESS BY EMPLOYING LYTIC POLYSACCHARIDES MONOOXYGENEASE (LPMO) IN COMBINATION WITH PROTEASES GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A 34d
18255762 FAT REDUCED GROUND MUCILAGINOUS SEEDS AS AFFORDABLE BINDER TRAN, LIEN THUY 68d
18720344 A CHOCOLATE PRODUCT COMPRISING A MILK ANALOGUE PRODUCT MERRIAM, ANDREW E —
18565676 FOOD OR BEVERAGE INGREDIENT COMPOSITION LI, CHANGQING —
18262634 AERATED FREEZE-DRIED BABY-SNACK NGUYEN, THANH H —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Nestlé S.A. 12

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17915
17934
17922
17591

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18720344 A CHOCOLATE PRODUCT COMPRISING A MILK ANALOGUE PRODUCT Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. MERRIAM, ANDREW E 1791 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 14, 2024
18694891 INCREASING HYDROLYSIS EFFICIENCY IN CEREAL PROCESS BY EMPLOYING LYTIC POLYSACCHARIDES MONOOXYGENEASE (LPMO) IN COMBINATION WITH PROTEASES Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. GWARTNEY, ELIZABETH A 1759 §103§112 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Mar 22, 2024
18545906 AERATED CREAMERS, PACKAGED READY-TO-USE AERATED CREAMERS, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING SUCH CREAMERS Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. WATTS, JENNA A 1791 §103§112 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Dec 19, 2023
18571885 SOLUBLE COFFEE POWDER Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. MCNEIL, JENNIFER C 1793 §112 Final Rejection 12d Pending Dec 19, 2023
18565676 FOOD OR BEVERAGE INGREDIENT COMPOSITION Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. LI, CHANGQING 1791 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 30, 2023
18262634 AERATED FREEZE-DRIED BABY-SNACK Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. NGUYEN, THANH H 1792 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 24, 2023
18255762 FAT REDUCED GROUND MUCILAGINOUS SEEDS AS AFFORDABLE BINDER Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. TRAN, LIEN THUY 1793 §103 Non-Final OA 68d Pending Jun 02, 2023
18044658 PLANT BASED SOFT SERVE FROZEN DESSERT COMPOSITION Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. MERRIAM, ANDREW E 1791 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 09, 2023
18006613 COFFEE BEVERAGE PRODUCT AND METHOD OF PREPARING THEREOF Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. JACOBSON, MICHELE LYNN 1793 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 24, 2023
18002750 FERMENTED BEVERAGE COMPOSITION Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. YOO, HONG THI 1792 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 21, 2022
17999237 FOAMING CREAMER Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. KERSHAW, KELLY P 1791 §103§112 Final Rejection 26d overdue Pending Nov 18, 2022
16462808 CREAMERS COMPOSITIONS Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. O'HERN, BRENT T 1793 §103§112 Final Rejection 9d overdue Pending May 21, 2019

Managing Dority & Manning, Pa & Societe Des Produits Nestle's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Dority & Manning, Pa & Societe Des Produits Nestle's patent allowance rate?

88.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Dority & Manning, Pa & Societe Des Produits Nestle were allowed, across 28,426 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Dority & Manning, Pa & Societe Des Produits Nestle average before allowance?

3.38 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Dority & Manning, Pa & Societe Des Produits Nestle have?

12 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 1 client, before 11 examiners in 4 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month