Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Double Helix Law

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

6 pending office actions • 3 clients • 6 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Double Helix Law has 5 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. Its profile records 165 career applications, establishing a historical base for reviewing current prosecution activity.

The resolved allowance rate is 44.83%, and the average is 2.69 office actions per allowance. The allowance figure indicates that fewer than half of the recorded resolved applications reached allowance, while the office-action average shows that allowance generally followed more than one examination exchange. Practitioners should give particular attention to claim strategy, eligibility, and substantive examination issues in biotechnology and pharmaceutical matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=165 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

44.8%
Allowance Rate
n=165
+0.04σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=165
2.7
OAs to Allowance
n=26
-0.54σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=26
1054 days
Time to Allowance
n=26
+29.5pp
Interview Lift
n=165
27.6%
RCE Rate
n=165
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=165

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=3 (min 20)
—
§102 Overcome
n=14 (min 20)
25.5%
§103 Overcome
n=47
33.3%
§112 Overcome
n=39

Specialization & Scale

A61K, C12N, A61P
Top CPC Subclasses
71%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=165
1
Practitioners
n=165
165.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=165

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (33%)
2
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (17%)
§112 only2 (33%)
Double-patenting + other1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PACKARD, BENJAMIN J 1 66.9% +15.3%
CONIGLIO, AUDREA JUNE BUCKLEY 1 53.1% +20.6%
MATALKAH, FATIMAH KHALAF 1 55.8% +27.4%
KASAYAN, KATRIEL BARCELLANO 1 25.0% +0.0%
TINSLEY, BRENDAN THOMAS 1 60.4% +74.3%
BURKHART, MICHAEL D 1 62.4% +11.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18341700 MATERIALS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING BLOOD PRODUCTS KASAYAN, KATRIEL BARCELLANO 54d
18942968 TRANSDERMAL DELIVERY FORMULATIONS AND METHODS FOR THE MANUFACTURE THEREOF CONIGLIO, AUDREA JUNE BUCKLEY —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17639281 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE MODIFICATION AND DELIVERY OF LYMPHOCYTES TINSLEY, BRENDAN THOMAS 134d overdue
17272631 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR GENETICALLY MODIFYING LYMPHOCYTES IN BLOOD OR IN ENRICHED PBMCS BURKHART, MICHAEL D 30d overdue
18942965 TRANSDERMAL DELIVERY FORMULATIONS AND METHODS FOR THE MANUFACTURE THEREOF PACKARD, BENJAMIN J —
18942968 TRANSDERMAL DELIVERY FORMULATIONS AND METHODS FOR THE MANUFACTURE THEREOF CONIGLIO, AUDREA JUNE BUCKLEY —
18653905 METHODS FOR CONTROLLING BLEEDING IN A SUBJECT AFFLICTED WITH HERMANSKY PUDLAK SYNDROME USING PLATELET DERIVATIVE COMPOSITIONS MATALKAH, FATIMAH KHALAF —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Lifeactive, Inc. 2
Cellphire 2
Exuma Biotech 2

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16382
16342
16121
16171

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18942965 TRANSDERMAL DELIVERY FORMULATIONS AND METHODS FOR THE MANUFACTURE THEREOF Lifeactive, Inc. PACKARD, BENJAMIN J 1612 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 11, 2024
18942968 TRANSDERMAL DELIVERY FORMULATIONS AND METHODS FOR THE MANUFACTURE THEREOF Lifeactive, Inc. CONIGLIO, AUDREA JUNE BUCKLEY 1617 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 11, 2024
18653905 METHODS FOR CONTROLLING BLEEDING IN A SUBJECT AFFLICTED WITH HERMANSKY PUDLAK SYNDROME USING PLATELET DERIVATIVE COMPOSITIONS Cellphire, Inc. MATALKAH, FATIMAH KHALAF 1638 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 02, 2024
18341700 MATERIALS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING BLOOD PRODUCTS Cellphire, Inc. KASAYAN, KATRIEL BARCELLANO 1634 §103§112Other Non-Final OA 54d Pending Jun 26, 2023
17639281 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE MODIFICATION AND DELIVERY OF LYMPHOCYTES Exuma Biotech Corp. TINSLEY, BRENDAN THOMAS 1634 §112 Non-Final OA 134d overdue Pending Feb 28, 2022
17272631 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR GENETICALLY MODIFYING LYMPHOCYTES IN BLOOD OR IN ENRICHED PBMCS Exuma Biotech Corp. BURKHART, MICHAEL D 1638 §112 Final Rejection 30d overdue Pending Mar 01, 2021

Managing Double Helix Law's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Double Helix Law's patent allowance rate?

44.8% of resolved applications prosecuted by Double Helix Law were allowed, across 165 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Double Helix Law average before allowance?

2.69 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Double Helix Law have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 3 clients, before 6 examiners in 4 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month