Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Dugan & Dugan, Pc

Technology areas: Communications • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 3 clients • 6 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Dugan & Dugan, PC currently handles 6 pending office actions in the Communications technology area. The firm has managed 1219 career applications to date. Its resolved allowance rate stands at 70.97 percent, reflecting the nature of the Communications sector.

Prosecution at the firm involves an average of 3.98 office actions per allowance. With 6 pending office actions, the firm applies its experience from 1219 career applications to current matters. The 70.97 percent resolved allowance rate and 3.98 average office actions per allowance provide a baseline for evaluating prosecution outcomes.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1219 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

71.0%
Allowance Rate
n=1219
+0.34σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1219
4.0
OAs to Allowance
n=528
+0.40σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=528
1133 days
Time to Allowance
n=528
+12.9pp
Interview Lift
n=1219
28.0%
RCE Rate
n=1219
3.8%
Appeal Rate
n=1219

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

71.2%
§101 Overcome
n=59
69.5%
§102 Overcome
n=279
72.2%
§103 Overcome
n=407
80.7%
§112 Overcome
n=207

Specialization & Scale

H10P, H01L, G01N
Top CPC Subclasses
32%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1219
2
Practitioners
n=1219
609.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=1219

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (71%)
0
Medium (0%)
2
Easy (29%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (29%)
Double-patenting only2 (29%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (43%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
14% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
2
Communications
29% of docket
1
Semiconductors
14% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
29% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEGESSE, NINI F 2 68.6% +15.3%
PATEL, JAYESH A 1 83.7% +5.1%
YUN, JURIE 1 87.4% +10.2%
OAKES, JUSTIN MONTGOMERY 1 100.0% +0.0%
WECKER, JENNIFER 1 70.9% +36.6%
MARCSISIN, ELLEN JEAN 1 34.6% +49.4%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18998437 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TRAINING SYSTEM FOR MEDICAL APPLICATIONS AND METHOD PATEL, JAYESH A —
18864516 ARRAY OF LIGHT SOURCES, FOURIER PTYCHOGRAPHIC IMAGING SYSTEM AND METHOD OF PERFORMING FOURIER PTYCHOGRAPHY YUN, JURIE —
18904006 IN-VITRO METHOD FOR DETERMINING A CELL TYPE OF A WHITE BLOOD CELL WITHOUT LABELING OAKES, JUSTIN MONTGOMERY —
18619034 AUTOMATIC ANALYSIS SYSTEM WECKER, JENNIFER —
18267449 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SIGNAL CALIBRATION IN A SENSOR SYSTEM MARCSISIN, ELLEN JEAN —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19033479 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEASURING AND/OR ANALYZING SWING INFORMATION LEGESSE, NINI F —
18864516 ARRAY OF LIGHT SOURCES, FOURIER PTYCHOGRAPHIC IMAGING SYSTEM AND METHOD OF PERFORMING FOURIER PTYCHOGRAPHY YUN, JURIE —
18909938 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEASURING AND/OR ANALYZING SWING INFORMATION LEGESSE, NINI F —
18619034 AUTOMATIC ANALYSIS SYSTEM WECKER, JENNIFER —
18267449 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SIGNAL CALIBRATION IN A SENSOR SYSTEM MARCSISIN, ELLEN JEAN —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37112
26771
28721
26621
16771

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18998437 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TRAINING SYSTEM FOR MEDICAL APPLICATIONS AND METHOD Siemens Healthineers AG PATEL, JAYESH A 2677 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 24, 2025
19033479 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEASURING AND/OR ANALYZING SWING INFORMATION Dugan Patents, LLC LEGESSE, NINI F 3711 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 21, 2025
18864516 ARRAY OF LIGHT SOURCES, FOURIER PTYCHOGRAPHIC IMAGING SYSTEM AND METHOD OF PERFORMING FOURIER PTYCHOGRAPHY Siemens Healthineers AG YUN, JURIE 2872 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 08, 2024
18909938 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEASURING AND/OR ANALYZING SWING INFORMATION Dugan Patents, LLC LEGESSE, NINI F 3711 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 08, 2024
18904006 IN-VITRO METHOD FOR DETERMINING A CELL TYPE OF A WHITE BLOOD CELL WITHOUT LABELING Siemens Healthineers AG OAKES, JUSTIN MONTGOMERY 2662 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 01, 2024
18619034 AUTOMATIC ANALYSIS SYSTEM Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH WECKER, JENNIFER §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 27, 2024
18267449 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SIGNAL CALIBRATION IN A SENSOR SYSTEM Siemens Healthineers Nederland B.V. MARCSISIN, ELLEN JEAN 1677 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 14, 2023

Managing Dugan & Dugan, Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Dugan & Dugan, Pc's patent allowance rate?

71.0% of resolved applications prosecuted by Dugan & Dugan, Pc were allowed, across 1,219 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Dugan & Dugan, Pc average before allowance?

3.98 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Dugan & Dugan, Pc have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 3 clients, before 6 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month