Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Ecotech Law Group, P.C.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

6 pending office actions • 6 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

EcoTech Law Group, P.C. handles Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems matters and reports 6 pending office actions across 415 career applications. The profile shows a focused current workload within a recorded prosecution portfolio.

The resolved allowance rate is 89.29%, and allowed matters average 2.43 office actions per allowance. Resolved matters frequently reach allowance, while successful cases generally involve more than one office-action exchange. These measures can inform response planning for transportation and mechanical systems applications.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=415 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

89.3%
Allowance Rate
n=415
+0.79σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=415
2.4
OAs to Allowance
n=250
-0.64σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=250
993 days
Time to Allowance
n=250
+6.8pp
Interview Lift
n=415
16.1%
RCE Rate
n=415
1.6%
Appeal Rate
n=415

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=18 (min 20)
77.3%
§102 Overcome
n=88
77.5%
§103 Overcome
n=138
79.5%
§112 Overcome
n=112

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G10K, Y02E
Top CPC Subclasses
11%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=415
2
Practitioners
n=415
207.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=415

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (83%)
1
Medium (17%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (33%)
§103 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
33% of docket
1
Information Tech
17% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RODRIGUEZ MOLINA, MARCOS JAVIER 1 54.4% +25.4%
SMITH, NKEISHA 1 73.0% +16.7%
KAMM, JUDITH MARIE 1 42.9% +57.1%
BUI, BRIAN DUYQUANG 1 — —
WHITAKER, ANDREW B 1 18.7% +18.6%
NGUYEN, BOI-LIEN THI 1 23.4% +30.3%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18738060 Beam Clamp, and a Mounting Assembly SMITH, NKEISHA 162d overdue
17442142 SEWAGE TREATMENT METHOD NGUYEN, BOI-LIEN THI 26d overdue
18393721 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF GENERATING CONSCIOUSNESS AFFECTS WHITAKER, ANDREW B 14d
18709033 ACTIVE METAL MICROSPHERES AND COMPOSITE EMBOLIC AGENT BASED ON SAME KAMM, JUDITH MARIE 77d
18293376 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CUSTOMIZING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR PERMITTING DIFFERENT TYPES OF INFERENCES BUI, BRIAN DUYQUANG —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18738060 Beam Clamp, and a Mounting Assembly SMITH, NKEISHA 162d overdue
17442142 SEWAGE TREATMENT METHOD NGUYEN, BOI-LIEN THI 26d overdue
18393721 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF GENERATING CONSCIOUSNESS AFFECTS WHITAKER, ANDREW B 14d
18709033 ACTIVE METAL MICROSPHERES AND COMPOSITE EMBOLIC AGENT BASED ON SAME KAMM, JUDITH MARIE 77d
18823588 CONTAINER WITH MAGNETIC INSERTS FOR RETAINING TUMBLERS RODRIGUEZ MOLINA, MARCOS JAVIER —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37351
36321
16111
21271
36291
17791

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18823588 CONTAINER WITH MAGNETIC INSERTS FOR RETAINING TUMBLERS High Camp Designs, Inc. RODRIGUEZ MOLINA, MARCOS JAVIER 3735 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 03, 2024
18738060 Beam Clamp, and a Mounting Assembly Polyplas International Ply Ltd. SMITH, NKEISHA 3632 §103§112 Final Rejection 162d overdue Pending Jun 10, 2024
18709033 ACTIVE METAL MICROSPHERES AND COMPOSITE EMBOLIC AGENT BASED ON SAME Chongqing Baimaitengshi Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. KAMM, JUDITH MARIE 1611 §103§112Other Final Rejection 77d Pending May 10, 2024
18293376 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CUSTOMIZING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR PERMITTING DIFFERENT TYPES OF INFERENCES Conservation X Labs, Inc. BUI, BRIAN DUYQUANG 2127 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 30, 2024
18393721 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF GENERATING CONSCIOUSNESS AFFECTS Twiin, Llc. WHITAKER, ANDREW B 3629 §101§103 Final Rejection 14d Pending Dec 22, 2023
17442142 SEWAGE TREATMENT METHOD Evocra Pty Limited NGUYEN, BOI-LIEN THI 1779 §103§112 Final Rejection 26d overdue Pending Sep 23, 2021

Managing Ecotech Law Group, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Ecotech Law Group, P.C.'s patent allowance rate?

89.3% of resolved applications prosecuted by Ecotech Law Group, P.C. were allowed, across 415 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Ecotech Law Group, P.C. average before allowance?

2.43 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Ecotech Law Group, P.C. have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 6 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month