Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Eversheds Sutherland (Us) LLP Am

Technology area: Communications

7 pending office actions • 2 clients • 7 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 137 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP Am handles matters in Communications and records 11044 career applications. It has 8 pending office actions, indicating current prosecution activity within a broad application history.

The resolved allowance rate is 90.47%, while the average office actions per allowance is 3.62. These figures indicate favorable resolved outcomes alongside multiple examination interactions before allowance.

For communications applicants, the profile supports planning for detailed claim analysis and recurring office-action responses. The application total provides context for experience, while the allowance rate and action average separately address results and prosecution effort.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=11044 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

90.5%
Allowance Rate
n=11044
+0.67σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=11044
3.6
OAs to Allowance
n=7718
-0.03σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=7718
1063 days
Time to Allowance
n=7718
+7.5pp
Interview Lift
n=11044
30.6%
RCE Rate
n=11044
2.2%
Appeal Rate
n=11044

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

87.6%
§101 Overcome
n=977
84.6%
§102 Overcome
n=3277
85.8%
§103 Overcome
n=5353
85.5%
§112 Overcome
n=3330

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G06Q, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
12%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=11044
12
Practitioners
n=11044
920.3
Apps / Practitioner
n=11044

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (57%)
3
Medium (43%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (29%)
§103 only3 (43%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
6
Communications
86% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
14% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ROMANO, ASHLEY K 1 78.6% +7.9%
OGUNBIYI, OLUWADAMILOL M 1 77.3% +19.2%
MCLEAN, IAN SCOTT 1 43.5% +31.1%
SHIN, SEONG-AH A 1 78.5% +21.6%
AKHAVANNIK, HADI 1 85.9% +13.1%
SHAH, PARAS D 1 73.7% +30.6%
TERRELL, EMILY C 1 58.6% +36.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18434291 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRAINING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS USING EMULATED DATASETS AKHAVANNIK, HADI —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18674519 NOISE CANCELLATION FOR OPEN MICROPHONE MODE MCLEAN, IAN SCOTT 3d overdue
18791215 MOBILE MANIPULATION ROBOTIC SYSTEM ROMANO, ASHLEY K —
18656086 Providing Content on Multiple Devices OGUNBIYI, OLUWADAMILOL M —
18652614 ROUTING NATURAL LANGUAGE COMMANDS TO THE APPROPRIATE APPLICATIONS SHIN, SEONG-AH A —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18674519 NOISE CANCELLATION FOR OPEN MICROPHONE MODE MCLEAN, IAN SCOTT 3d overdue
18514376 Architecture for a Hub Configured to Control a Second Device While a Connection to a Remote System is Unavailable SHAH, PARAS D 71d
18656086 Providing Content on Multiple Devices OGUNBIYI, OLUWADAMILOL M —
18652614 ROUTING NATURAL LANGUAGE COMMANDS TO THE APPROPRIATE APPLICATIONS SHIN, SEONG-AH A —
18434291 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRAINING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS USING EMULATED DATASETS AKHAVANNIK, HADI —
18007692 AUTOMATED VERIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS RELATED TO ACCOUNTS WITHIN A SERVICE PROVIDER NETWORK TERRELL, EMILY C —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Amazon 6
Rightbot Technologies, Inc. 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26532
36521
26541
26591
26641
26661

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18791215 MOBILE MANIPULATION ROBOTIC SYSTEM Rightbot Technologies, Inc. ROMANO, ASHLEY K 3652 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 31, 2024
18656086 Providing Content on Multiple Devices Amazon Technologies, Inc. OGUNBIYI, OLUWADAMILOL M 2653 §101Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 22, 2024
18674519 NOISE CANCELLATION FOR OPEN MICROPHONE MODE Amazon Technologies, Inc. MCLEAN, IAN SCOTT 2654 §102§103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending May 24, 2024
18652614 ROUTING NATURAL LANGUAGE COMMANDS TO THE APPROPRIATE APPLICATIONS Amazon Technologies, Inc. SHIN, SEONG-AH A 2659 §101Other Final Rejection — Pending May 01, 2024
18434291 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRAINING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS USING EMULATED DATASETS Amazon Technologies, Inc. AKHAVANNIK, HADI 2664 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 06, 2024
18514376 Architecture for a Hub Configured to Control a Second Device While a Connection to a Remote System is Unavailable Amazon Technologies, Inc. SHAH, PARAS D 2653 §103 Non-Final OA 71d Pending Nov 20, 2023
18007692 AUTOMATED VERIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS RELATED TO ACCOUNTS WITHIN A SERVICE PROVIDER NETWORK Amazon Technologies, Inc. TERRELL, EMILY C 2666 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 01, 2022

Managing Eversheds Sutherland (Us) LLP Am's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Eversheds Sutherland (Us) LLP Am's patent allowance rate?

90.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by Eversheds Sutherland (Us) LLP Am were allowed, across 11,044 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Eversheds Sutherland (Us) LLP Am average before allowance?

3.62 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Eversheds Sutherland (Us) LLP Am have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 2 clients, before 7 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month