Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Ewers Ip Law Pllc

Technology areas: Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

9 pending office actions • 4 clients • 9 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Ewers IP Law PLLC focuses on Communications and records 463 career applications. Its profile shows 9 pending office actions, indicating active prosecution alongside a defined application history.

The resolved allowance rate is 87.26%, and the average office actions per allowance is 2.66. The outcome rate reflects favorable results among resolved matters, while the action average indicates that allowance generally follows multiple examination interactions.

For communications applicants, these figures support review of both claim strategy and response planning. The profile offers an outcome measure and an effort measure in addition to application volume, but it does not identify the technical or procedural factors driving individual matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=463 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.3%
Allowance Rate
n=463
+0.46σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=463
2.7
OAs to Allowance
n=370
-0.48σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=370
950 days
Time to Allowance
n=370
+7.4pp
Interview Lift
n=463
28.1%
RCE Rate
n=463
0.5%
Appeal Rate
n=463

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

83.9%
§101 Overcome
n=31
73.9%
§102 Overcome
n=180
75.3%
§103 Overcome
n=255
79.2%
§112 Overcome
n=212

Specialization & Scale

G02B, A61B, G06T
Top CPC Subclasses
24%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=463
0
Practitioners
n=463
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=463 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (56%)
4
Medium (44%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (22%)
§103 only4 (44%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
11% of docket
2
Communications
22% of docket
2
Semiconductors
22% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
44% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WINDSOR, COURTNEY J 1 86.3% +9.0%
WALTERS, JOHN DANIEL 1 80.4% +6.0%
YANG, JIANXUN 1 74.3% +19.1%
LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN 1 61.1% +41.6%
AYUB, HINA F 1 85.0% +17.2%
PINKNEY, DAWAYNE 1 80.6% +18.0%
WHITE, JAY MICHAEL 1 47.1% +100.0%
HAYES, KRISTEN C 1 68.4% +21.6%
WOZNICKI, JACQUELINE 1 49.8% +26.2%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18382047 OPTICAL ANALYSIS DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A CHARACTERISTIC OF A MEDIUM, HOUSING, AND SYSTEM AYUB, HINA F 9d
18244283 WAVEFRONT MANIPULATOR FOR HEAD-UP DISPLAY WITH HOLOGRAPHIC ELEMENT, OPTICAL ARRANGEMENT AND HEAD-UP DISPLAY PINKNEY, DAWAYNE 34d

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19080852 METHOD FOR GENERATING A COLORED IMAGE, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING A COLORED IMAGE WINDSOR, COURTNEY J —
18924985 SHOE FASTENING SYSTEM WALTERS, JOHN DANIEL —
18776247 SPORTS SHOE LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN —
18238445 METHOD, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND DATA PROCESSING UNIT FOR PREPARING OBSERVATION OF FLUORESCENCE INTENSITY, METHOD FOR OBSERVING FLUORESCENCE INTENSITY, AND OPTICAL OBSERVATION SYSTEM WHITE, JAY MICHAEL —
17683202 INTRAOCULAR LENS COMPRISING AN ARM WITH AN ADJUSTABLE LENGTH AS A HAPTIC WOZNICKI, JACQUELINE —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18382047 OPTICAL ANALYSIS DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A CHARACTERISTIC OF A MEDIUM, HOUSING, AND SYSTEM AYUB, HINA F 9d
18244283 WAVEFRONT MANIPULATOR FOR HEAD-UP DISPLAY WITH HOLOGRAPHIC ELEMENT, OPTICAL ARRANGEMENT AND HEAD-UP DISPLAY PINKNEY, DAWAYNE 34d
18784873 METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN OPTICAL AXIS OF A MAIN OBSERVER CAMERA OF A MEDICAL MICROSCOPE ARRANGEMENT IN A REFERENCE COORDINATE SYSTEM, AND MEDICAL MICROSCOPE ARRANGEMENT YANG, JIANXUN —
18776247 SPORTS SHOE LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN —
18238445 METHOD, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND DATA PROCESSING UNIT FOR PREPARING OBSERVATION OF FLUORESCENCE INTENSITY, METHOD FOR OBSERVING FLUORESCENCE INTENSITY, AND OPTICAL OBSERVATION SYSTEM WHITE, JAY MICHAEL —
18221844 LADDER HAYES, KRISTEN C —
17683202 INTRAOCULAR LENS COMPRISING AN ARM WITH AN ADJUSTABLE LENGTH AS A HAPTIC WOZNICKI, JACQUELINE —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Carl Zeiss 5
Powerslide GmbH 2
iSud Solutions GmbH 1
Zarges GmbH 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26611
36131
26621
37321
28771
28721
21881
36421
37741

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19080852 METHOD FOR GENERATING A COLORED IMAGE, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING A COLORED IMAGE Carl Zeiss AG WINDSOR, COURTNEY J 2661 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 15, 2025
18924985 SHOE FASTENING SYSTEM Powerslide GmbH WALTERS, JOHN DANIEL 3613 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 23, 2024
18784873 METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN OPTICAL AXIS OF A MAIN OBSERVER CAMERA OF A MEDICAL MICROSCOPE ARRANGEMENT IN A REFERENCE COORDINATE SYSTEM, AND MEDICAL MICROSCOPE ARRANGEMENT Carl Zeiss Meditec AG YANG, JIANXUN 2662 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 25, 2024
18776247 SPORTS SHOE Powerslide GmbH LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN 3732 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 17, 2024
18382047 OPTICAL ANALYSIS DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A CHARACTERISTIC OF A MEDIUM, HOUSING, AND SYSTEM Isud Solutions GmbH AYUB, HINA F 2877 §103 Final Rejection 9d Pending Oct 19, 2023
18244283 WAVEFRONT MANIPULATOR FOR HEAD-UP DISPLAY WITH HOLOGRAPHIC ELEMENT, OPTICAL ARRANGEMENT AND HEAD-UP DISPLAY Carl Zeiss Jena GmbH PINKNEY, DAWAYNE 2872 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Sep 10, 2023
18238445 METHOD, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND DATA PROCESSING UNIT FOR PREPARING OBSERVATION OF FLUORESCENCE INTENSITY, METHOD FOR OBSERVING FLUORESCENCE INTENSITY, AND OPTICAL OBSERVATION SYSTEM Carl Zeiss Meditec AG WHITE, JAY MICHAEL 2188 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 25, 2023
18221844 LADDER Zarges GmbH HAYES, KRISTEN C 3642 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 13, 2023
17683202 INTRAOCULAR LENS COMPRISING AN ARM WITH AN ADJUSTABLE LENGTH AS A HAPTIC Carl Zeiss Meditec AG WOZNICKI, JACQUELINE 3774 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 28, 2022

Managing Ewers Ip Law Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Ewers Ip Law Pllc's patent allowance rate?

87.3% of resolved applications prosecuted by Ewers Ip Law Pllc were allowed, across 463 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Ewers Ip Law Pllc average before allowance?

2.66 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Ewers Ip Law Pllc have?

9 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 4 clients, before 9 examiners in 9 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month