Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Ewing & Jones, Pllc

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 5 clients • 7 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Ewing & Jones, PLLC works in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and records 1239 career applications. Its profile includes 8 pending office actions, showing current prosecution activity within a substantial application history.

The resolved allowance rate is 89.07%, and the average office actions per allowance is 3.46. The allowance measure indicates favorable resolved outcomes, while the action average shows that repeated examination work is commonly part of the path to allowance.

For medical-device and mechanical-engineering applicants, the profile supports planning around structural claim detail and continued response activity. The application total provides context for experience, while the outcome and action measures offer distinct perspectives on prosecution results and effort.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1239 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

89.1%
Allowance Rate
n=1239
+0.59σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1239
3.5
OAs to Allowance
n=701
+0.03σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=701
883 days
Time to Allowance
n=701
+9.3pp
Interview Lift
n=1239
24.4%
RCE Rate
n=1239
4.0%
Appeal Rate
n=1239

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

86.0%
§101 Overcome
n=43
85.6%
§102 Overcome
n=313
86.5%
§103 Overcome
n=511
84.6%
§112 Overcome
n=357

Specialization & Scale

E21B, E04C, G01V
Top CPC Subclasses
27%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1239
0
Practitioners
n=1239
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=1239 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (71%)
1
Medium (14%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (14%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (14%)
§103 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (57%)
No statute on record1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
29% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
71% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TENTONI, LEO B 1 81.9% +10.1%
RUFRANO, ALEXANDER TYLER 1 54.5% +27.8%
FOLLMAN, BRODIE J 1 74.1% +10.4%
WLODARSKI, NICHOLAS NMN 1 84.1% +11.7%
MAUST, TIMOTHY LEWIS 1 81.8% +10.3%
WUNDERLICH, ERWIN J 1 42.9% +40.4%
RUFO, LOUIS J 1 54.6% +22.8%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19273870 THREADED COUPLING WITH GAS TIGHT SEALS AND INTERLOCKING DOVETAIL THREADS RUFRANO, ALEXANDER TYLER —
18949566 HYBRID TRACTOR/TRAILER SYSTEM FOLLMAN, BRODIE J —
18940282 NEGOTIATING MULTI-CONTROLLER LOGIC FOR FAN IN MOBILE FRACTURING UNIT WLODARSKI, NICHOLAS NMN —
18883485 PLATFORM LIFT FOR RAILROAD CAR MOVING VEHICLE MAUST, TIMOTHY LEWIS —
18265036 MULTI-PASS HEATER WUNDERLICH, ERWIN J —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19152758 PROCESS FOR TREATMENT OF AN INITIAL POLYPROPYLENE-CONTAINING MATERIAL TO PRODUCE A POLYPROPYLENE COMPOSITION FOR INJECTION MOLDING TENTONI, LEO B —
19273870 THREADED COUPLING WITH GAS TIGHT SEALS AND INTERLOCKING DOVETAIL THREADS RUFRANO, ALEXANDER TYLER —
18949566 HYBRID TRACTOR/TRAILER SYSTEM FOLLMAN, BRODIE J —
18940282 NEGOTIATING MULTI-CONTROLLER LOGIC FOR FAN IN MOBILE FRACTURING UNIT WLODARSKI, NICHOLAS NMN —
18883485 PLATFORM LIFT FOR RAILROAD CAR MOVING VEHICLE MAUST, TIMOTHY LEWIS —
18265036 MULTI-PASS HEATER WUNDERLICH, ERWIN J —
17773920 CATALYST-IONOMER SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GAS-PHASE ELECTROLYSIS RUFO, LOUIS J —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17421
36791
36691
37631
37531
37611
17951

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19152758 PROCESS FOR TREATMENT OF AN INITIAL POLYPROPYLENE-CONTAINING MATERIAL TO PRODUCE A POLYPROPYLENE COMPOSITION FOR INJECTION MOLDING Institut National Des Sciences Appliquées De Lyon (Insa Lyon) TENTONI, LEO B 1742 Other Final Rejection — Pending Jul 31, 2025
19273870 THREADED COUPLING WITH GAS TIGHT SEALS AND INTERLOCKING DOVETAIL THREADS Precision Couplings, LLC RUFRANO, ALEXANDER TYLER 3679 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 18, 2025
18949566 HYBRID TRACTOR/TRAILER SYSTEM Stewart & Stevenson LLC FOLLMAN, BRODIE J 3669 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 15, 2024
18940282 NEGOTIATING MULTI-CONTROLLER LOGIC FOR FAN IN MOBILE FRACTURING UNIT Stewart & Stevenson LLC WLODARSKI, NICHOLAS NMN 3763 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 07, 2024
18883485 PLATFORM LIFT FOR RAILROAD CAR MOVING VEHICLE Stewart & Stevenson LLC MAUST, TIMOTHY LEWIS 3753 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 12, 2024
18265036 MULTI-PASS HEATER Hc Thermal LLC WUNDERLICH, ERWIN J 3761 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 02, 2023
17773920 CATALYST-IONOMER SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GAS-PHASE ELECTROLYSIS The Governing Council of the University of Toronto RUFO, LOUIS J 1795 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 03, 2022

Managing Ewing & Jones, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Ewing & Jones, Pllc's patent allowance rate?

89.1% of resolved applications prosecuted by Ewing & Jones, Pllc were allowed, across 1,239 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Ewing & Jones, Pllc average before allowance?

3.46 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Ewing & Jones, Pllc have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 7 examiners in 7 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month