Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
8 pending office actions • 8 clients • 8 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
This profile covers Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and shows 8 pending office actions. Its record includes 1885 career applications, providing historical scale for the current prosecution docket.
The resolved allowance rate is 78.47%, and the average is 3.09 office actions per allowance. The resolved portfolio shows allowance in a majority of matters, with each allowance linked to multiple office actions on average.
Practitioners can use these figures to separate outcome expectations from workload expectations. The allowance rate describes the resolved result pattern, while the action average indicates that examination commonly extends beyond an initial office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (12%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (12%) |
| §103 only | 1 (12%) |
| §112 only | 1 (12%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (12%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (12%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| YAO, THEODORE N | 1 | 66.7% | +39.0% |
| JEUDY, JOSNEL | 1 | 83.9% | -16.0% |
| DO, ROWLAND | 1 | 70.0% | -5.3% |
| DEONAUTH, NIRVANA | 1 | 70.1% | +33.6% |
| MAI, HAO D | 1 | 49.2% | +39.4% |
| WEBB III, JAMES L | 1 | 13.9% | +21.9% |
| WEBB, JESSICA MARIE | 1 | 33.6% | +53.0% |
| WEDDINGTON, KEVIN E | 1 | 75.3% | +9.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19069097 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICE EMPLOYING AN ELECTRONIC INFORMATION REPOSITORY STORING SOCIAL NETWORK USER INFORMATION, DEVELOPER INFORMATION, AND MOBILE NETWORK OPERATOR INFORMATION | JEUDY, JOSNEL | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18838868 | VEHICLE DIAGNOSTIC METHODS AND SYSTEMS | DEONAUTH, NIRVANA | 48d |
| 19056611 | LEVER-OPERATED ADJUSTMENT DEVICES, FIT SYSTEMS, AND LINE TENSIONING SYSTEMS | DO, ROWLAND | — |
| 18238006 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS EMPLOYING PROFESSIONAL CULTURE TRAITS TO EVALUATE COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS OF INDIVIDUALS | WEBB III, JAMES L | — |
| 18215078 | MEDICAL STRUCTURED REPORTING WORKFLOW ASSISTED BY NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES | WEBB, JESSICA MARIE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18710131 | IMPROVED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES | MAI, HAO D | 35d overdue |
| 18838868 | VEHICLE DIAGNOSTIC METHODS AND SYSTEMS | DEONAUTH, NIRVANA | 48d |
| 19207245 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING INJECTOR BOTTOM HOLE PRESSURE IN A HYDROCARBON RECOVERY OPERATION USING LINER-DEPLOYED OUTFLOW CONTROL DEVICES | YAO, THEODORE N | — |
| 18238006 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS EMPLOYING PROFESSIONAL CULTURE TRAITS TO EVALUATE COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS OF INDIVIDUALS | WEBB III, JAMES L | — |
| 18215078 | MEDICAL STRUCTURED REPORTING WORKFLOW ASSISTED BY NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES | WEBB, JESSICA MARIE | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Cenovus Energy | 1 |
| Telesocial, Inc. | 1 |
| Garrett Ray Hurley | 1 |
| BELRON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED | 1 |
| Sympal, Inc. | 1 |
| Torre Labs, Inc. | 1 |
| Ebit srl | 1 |
| BM Health GmbH | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3676 | 1 |
| 2438 | 1 |
| 3677 | 1 |
| 3726 | 1 |
| 3772 | 1 |
| 3624 | 1 |
| 3683 | 1 |
| 1629 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19207245 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING INJECTOR BOTTOM HOLE PRESSURE IN A HYDROCARBON RECOVERY OPERATION USING LINER-DEPLOYED OUTFLOW CONTROL DEVICES | Cenovus Energy Inc. | YAO, THEODORE N | 3676 | §112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | May 13, 2025 |
| 19069097 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICE EMPLOYING AN ELECTRONIC INFORMATION REPOSITORY STORING SOCIAL NETWORK USER INFORMATION, DEVELOPER INFORMATION, AND MOBILE NETWORK OPERATOR INFORMATION | Telesocial, Inc. | JEUDY, JOSNEL | 2438 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 03, 2025 |
| 19056611 | LEVER-OPERATED ADJUSTMENT DEVICES, FIT SYSTEMS, AND LINE TENSIONING SYSTEMS | Garrett Ray Hurley | DO, ROWLAND | 3677 | §102§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 18, 2025 |
| 18838868 | VEHICLE DIAGNOSTIC METHODS AND SYSTEMS | Belron International Limited | DEONAUTH, NIRVANA | 3726 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 48d | Pending | Aug 15, 2024 |
| 18710131 | IMPROVED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES | Sympal, Inc. | MAI, HAO D | 3772 | §103DP | Final Rejection | 35d overdue | Pending | May 14, 2024 |
| 18238006 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS EMPLOYING PROFESSIONAL CULTURE TRAITS TO EVALUATE COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS OF INDIVIDUALS | Torre Labs, Inc. | WEBB III, JAMES L | 3624 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 25, 2023 |
| 18215078 | MEDICAL STRUCTURED REPORTING WORKFLOW ASSISTED BY NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES | Ebit Srl | WEBB, JESSICA MARIE | 3683 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 27, 2023 |
| 17909163 | COMPOSITION FOR POLYAMINE BIOSYNTHESIS | BM Health GmbH | WEDDINGTON, KEVIN E | 1629 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 149d overdue | Pending | Sep 02, 2022 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial78.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by Gordon & Jacobson, P.C. were allowed, across 1,885 applications in USPTO records.
3.09 office actions per allowed application on average.
8 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 8 clients, before 8 examiners in 8 art units.
