Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Gutwein Law-Primary

Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 8 clients • 8 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 14 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Gutwein Law-Primary operates in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The firm has 193 career applications. A resolved allowance rate of 74.7 percent has been achieved across these matters. On average, the firm receives 2.65 office actions per allowance. There are currently 4 pending office actions requiring responses.

The 2.65 average office actions per allowance provides a benchmark for the expected duration of prosecution. Practitioners can compare the pending office actions to this average to estimate future workload. The 74.7 percent resolved allowance rate indicates the historical probability of success for applications that reach a final resolution. With 193 career applications, the firm has a documented history in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. These 4 pending office actions represent the current focus of the firm's prosecution efforts. The relationship between the average office actions and the allowance rate defines the firm's prosecution profile. This historical data provides a basis for understanding the firm's typical prosecution cycle.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=193 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

74.7%
Allowance Rate
n=193
+0.37σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=193
2.6
OAs to Allowance
n=62
-0.38σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=62
995 days
Time to Allowance
n=62
+22.8pp
Interview Lift
n=193
7.2%
RCE Rate
n=193
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=193

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=13 (min 20)
47.5%
§102 Overcome
n=40
50.0%
§103 Overcome
n=62
58.5%
§112 Overcome
n=53

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, G01N, H01M
Top CPC Subclasses
14%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=193
0
Practitioners
n=193
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=193 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (75%)
2
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (12%)
Double-patenting + other1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (75%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
12% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
38% of docket
4
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SULLIVAN, MATTHEW J 1 62.9% +22.9%
ALBERS, KEVIN S 1 26.6% +49.7%
FERGUSON, LAWRENCE D 1 78.4% +13.2%
PREMRAJ, CATHERINE C 1 56.5% +48.6%
SAN MARTIN, EDGARDO 1 76.0% +6.5%
POON, ROBERT 1 41.9% +27.0%
FLICK, JASON E 1 80.6% +13.4%
CAMMARATA, MICHAEL ROBERT 1 69.8% +34.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18731191 SLOTTED PERITONEAL ACCESS CATHETER FLICK, JASON E —

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19103431 ANKLE FOOT ORTHOSIS WITH TRACK SYSTEM AND MECHANISM ALBERS, KEVIN S 16d overdue
19145982 LACE CINCHING APPARATUS AND METHOD OF USE SULLIVAN, MATTHEW J —
19101534 OPTICAL MATERIALS AND METHODS THEREOF FERGUSON, LAWRENCE D —
19038700 ADVANCED WEARABLE HYDRATION MONITORING SYSTEM PREMRAJ, CATHERINE C —
18948448 SOUND DAMPING PANEL ASSEMBLY AND METHOD THEREOF SAN MARTIN, EDGARDO —
18369643 system and method to measure, identify, process and reduce food defects during manual or automated processing CAMMARATA, MICHAEL ROBERT —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19103431 ANKLE FOOT ORTHOSIS WITH TRACK SYSTEM AND MECHANISM ALBERS, KEVIN S 16d overdue
19145982 LACE CINCHING APPARATUS AND METHOD OF USE SULLIVAN, MATTHEW J —
19101534 OPTICAL MATERIALS AND METHODS THEREOF FERGUSON, LAWRENCE D —
19038700 ADVANCED WEARABLE HYDRATION MONITORING SYSTEM PREMRAJ, CATHERINE C —
18864252 WALLET ASSEMBLY HAVING A BAND MEMBER POON, ROBERT —
18731191 SLOTTED PERITONEAL ACCESS CATHETER FLICK, JASON E —
18369643 system and method to measure, identify, process and reduce food defects during manual or automated processing CAMMARATA, MICHAEL ROBERT —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36771
37861
37351
26671

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19145982 LACE CINCHING APPARATUS AND METHOD OF USE Gear Ties LLC D/B/A Xtrudex SULLIVAN, MATTHEW J 3677 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 07, 2025
19103431 ANKLE FOOT ORTHOSIS WITH TRACK SYSTEM AND MECHANISM Thrive Orthopedics, LLC ALBERS, KEVIN S 3786 §103§112Other Non-Final OA 16d overdue Pending Feb 12, 2025
19101534 OPTICAL MATERIALS AND METHODS THEREOF Star Voltaic, LLC FERGUSON, LAWRENCE D §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 05, 2025
19038700 ADVANCED WEARABLE HYDRATION MONITORING SYSTEM Predictive Wear PREMRAJ, CATHERINE C §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 27, 2025
18948448 SOUND DAMPING PANEL ASSEMBLY AND METHOD THEREOF Mdpt LLC SAN MARTIN, EDGARDO §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 14, 2024
18864252 WALLET ASSEMBLY HAVING A BAND MEMBER Daniel Martinson POON, ROBERT 3735 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 08, 2024
18731191 SLOTTED PERITONEAL ACCESS CATHETER Hemocleanse Technologies LLC FLICK, JASON E §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending May 31, 2024
18369643 system and method to measure, identify, process and reduce food defects during manual or automated processing Orchard Holding CAMMARATA, MICHAEL ROBERT 2667 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 18, 2023

Managing Gutwein Law-Primary's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month