Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Haynes And Boone, LLP (58253)

7 pending office actions • 1 client • 7 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 22 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (14%)
5
Medium (71%)
1
Easy (14%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (14%)
§103 only4 (57%)
§102 only1 (14%)
§112 only1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
14% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
14% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
71% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KELLY, CATHERINE A 1 59.7% +28.3%
ISLAM, MUHAMMAD S 1 87.8% +9.2%
BUI, HANH THI MINH 1 80.0% +64.1%
WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE 1 73.8% +30.4%
RISIC, ABIGAIL ANNE 1 77.5% +7.3%
CHU, KATHERINE J 1 46.6% +20.4%
HANES JR., JOHN 1 47.3% +40.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18676634 MOVABLE DOOR SYSTEM USABLE WITH ENERGY HARVESTING BREAKOUT SWITCH ISLAM, MUHAMMAD S 9d overdue

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18635557 ARCHITECTURAL SPECIFICATION DEVELOPMENT PLATFORM BUI, HANH THI MINH 15d

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18635557 ARCHITECTURAL SPECIFICATION DEVELOPMENT PLATFORM BUI, HANH THI MINH 15d
18780903 LOUVER SYSTEMS FOR A PANEL OF A MOVABLE BARRIER KELLY, CATHERINE A 34d
18332406 Dock Leveler With Spring Anchor CHU, KATHERINE J 61d
18525214 WINDOW LITE FRAME SYSTEMS AND METHODS WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE 76d
17889195 MODULAR BARRIER PANEL FRAME REINFORCEMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS HANES JR., JOHN

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
OVERHEAD DOOR CORPORATION 7

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36712
36191
28461
21921
36351
36341

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18780903 LOUVER SYSTEMS FOR A PANEL OF A MOVABLE BARRIER Overhead Door Corporation KELLY, CATHERINE A 3619 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Jul 23, 2024
18676634 MOVABLE DOOR SYSTEM USABLE WITH ENERGY HARVESTING BREAKOUT SWITCH Overhead Door Corporation ISLAM, MUHAMMAD S 2846 §102 Non-Final OA 9d overdue Pending May 29, 2024
18635557 ARCHITECTURAL SPECIFICATION DEVELOPMENT PLATFORM Overhead Door Corporation BUI, HANH THI MINH 2192 §101 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Apr 15, 2024
18525214 WINDOW LITE FRAME SYSTEMS AND METHODS Overhead Door Corporation WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE 3635 §103 Non-Final OA 76d Pending Nov 30, 2023
18332591 DOCK LEVELER WITH SUPPORTED DECK HINGE Overhead Door Corporation RISIC, ABIGAIL ANNE 3671 §103 Non-Final OA 26d overdue Pending Jun 09, 2023
18332406 Dock Leveler With Spring Anchor Overhead Door Corporation CHU, KATHERINE J 3671 §112 Non-Final OA 61d Pending Jun 09, 2023
17889195 MODULAR BARRIER PANEL FRAME REINFORCEMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS Overhead Door Corporation HANES JR., JOHN 3634 §103 Final Rejection Pending Aug 16, 2022

Managing Haynes And Boone, LLP (58253)'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month