Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti Pc-Angiodynamics

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 2 clients • 6 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI PC-Angiodynamics has 6 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The profile records 9207 career applications, placing the active matter count within a broad historical prosecution record. This combination indicates current device-related examination work supported by extensive filing experience.

The resolved allowance rate is 85.26%, and allowed matters have averaged 2.8 office actions. The outcome figure and action figure serve different planning purposes: the first concerns resolved allowance results, while the second describes the examination activity typically associated with those results. Counsel can use both when assessing response strategy and expected prosecution effort.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=9207 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

85.3%
Allowance Rate
n=9207
+0.59σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=9207
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=6005
-0.51σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=6005
1003 days
Time to Allowance
n=6005
+8.3pp
Interview Lift
n=9207
19.8%
RCE Rate
n=9207
1.0%
Appeal Rate
n=9207

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

75.4%
§101 Overcome
n=460
79.1%
§102 Overcome
n=2144
80.5%
§103 Overcome
n=3386
82.4%
§112 Overcome
n=3018

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61B, A61P
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=9207
0
Practitioners
n=9207
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=9207 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (17%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (17%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
17% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
83% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TANNER, JOCELIN C 1 72.3% +34.7%
MINCHELLA, ADAM ZACHARY 1 63.8% +34.1%
CLARK, RYAN T 1 50.4% +18.2%
GHAND, JENNIFER LEIGH-STEWAR 1 60.5% +27.8%
HOUGH, JESSANDRA F 1 45.8% +35.3%
PYO, KEVIN K 1 87.0% +9.9%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18673430 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR TESTING ABLATION SYSTEMS PYO, KEVIN K 20d
19001686 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR REMOVING MATERIAL FROM A HOLLOW ANATOMICAL STRUCTURE TANNER, JOCELIN C —
18905204 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ABLATING A TISSUE SITE BY ELECTROPORATION WITH REAL-TIME PULSE MONITORING CLARK, RYAN T —
18882862 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INCREASING A TARGET ZONE FOR ELECTRICAL ABLATION GHAND, JENNIFER LEIGH-STEWAR —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19001686 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR REMOVING MATERIAL FROM A HOLLOW ANATOMICAL STRUCTURE TANNER, JOCELIN C —
18969427 TECHNIQUES FOR CONTROLLING AN IRREVERSIBLE ELECTROPORATION SYSTEM MINCHELLA, ADAM ZACHARY —
18905204 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ABLATING A TISSUE SITE BY ELECTROPORATION WITH REAL-TIME PULSE MONITORING CLARK, RYAN T —
18882862 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INCREASING A TARGET ZONE FOR ELECTRICAL ABLATION GHAND, JENNIFER LEIGH-STEWAR —
18675359 HYBRID CATHETER FOR VASCULAR INTERVENTION HOUGH, JESSANDRA F —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
AngioDynamics 4
EXIMO MEDICAL LTD. 2

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37942
37962
37711
28781

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19001686 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR REMOVING MATERIAL FROM A HOLLOW ANATOMICAL STRUCTURE AngioDynamics, Inc. TANNER, JOCELIN C 3771 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 26, 2024
18969427 TECHNIQUES FOR CONTROLLING AN IRREVERSIBLE ELECTROPORATION SYSTEM AngioDynamics, Inc. MINCHELLA, ADAM ZACHARY 3794 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 05, 2024
18905204 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ABLATING A TISSUE SITE BY ELECTROPORATION WITH REAL-TIME PULSE MONITORING AngioDynamics, Inc. CLARK, RYAN T 3794 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 03, 2024
18882862 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INCREASING A TARGET ZONE FOR ELECTRICAL ABLATION AngioDynamics, Inc. GHAND, JENNIFER LEIGH-STEWAR 3796 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 12, 2024
18675359 HYBRID CATHETER FOR VASCULAR INTERVENTION Eximo Medical Ltd. HOUGH, JESSANDRA F 3796 §112Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 28, 2024
18673430 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR TESTING ABLATION SYSTEMS Eximo Medical Ltd. PYO, KEVIN K 2878 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 20d Pending May 24, 2024

Managing Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti Pc-Angiodynamics's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti Pc-Angiodynamics's patent allowance rate?

85.3% of resolved applications prosecuted by Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti Pc-Angiodynamics were allowed, across 9,207 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti Pc-Angiodynamics average before allowance?

2.80 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti Pc-Angiodynamics have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 2 clients, before 6 examiners in 4 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month