Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Iandiorio Teska & Coleman, LLP

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

6 pending office actions • 3 clients • 6 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Iandiorio Teska & Coleman, LLP has 8 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials and 1150 career applications. The recorded application volume provides a substantial context for the firm’s current prosecution activity.

Its resolved allowance rate is 88.52%, with an average of 3.6 office actions per allowance. The figures suggest that resolved matters frequently reach allowance, but often after multiple examination exchanges.

For practitioners, the profile supports an approach that combines efficient docket monitoring with technically precise responses addressing composition, process, and materials distinctions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1150 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.5%
Allowance Rate
n=1150
+0.59σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1150
3.6
OAs to Allowance
n=663
+0.13σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=663
1071 days
Time to Allowance
n=663
+9.6pp
Interview Lift
n=1150
26.8%
RCE Rate
n=1150
0.8%
Appeal Rate
n=1150

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

91.7%
§101 Overcome
n=36
82.8%
§102 Overcome
n=279
84.4%
§103 Overcome
n=469
84.2%
§112 Overcome
n=322

Specialization & Scale

A61B, G01N, Y10T
Top CPC Subclasses
16%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1150
1
Practitioners
n=1150
1150.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1150

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (83%)
1
Medium (17%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (83%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
83% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
17% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SPIES, BRADLEY R 1 74.1% +19.1%
PRINCE JR, FREDDIE GARY 1 79.0% +20.7%
KURTZ, BENJAMIN M 1 56.7% +17.7%
PATEL, PRANAV N 1 68.8% +21.7%
FERENCE, JAMES M 1 71.2% +16.8%
SUN, CAITLYN MINGYUN 1 63.7% +11.8%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18777825 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SEPARATING COMPETING ANIONS FROM PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) IN A FLOW OF WATER SPIES, BRADLEY R —
18648703 GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON (GAC) REACTIVATION WASTE PRODUCT ENHANCED ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEM FOR REMOVING PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) FROM A FLOW OF WASTEWATER AND/OR LANDFILL LEACHATE PRINCE JR, FREDDIE GARY —
18443736 MODIFIED MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR(MBR) SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REMOVING PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) FROM A FLOW OF WASTEWATER AND/OR LANDFILL LEACHATE PATEL, PRANAV N —
18432340 BUILDING INSULATION AND CLADDING SYSTEM FERENCE, JAMES M —
18353265 ELECTROCHEMICAL METHOD FOR FABRICATION OF HIGH-PURITY, HIGH-CONDUCTIVITY CORRUGATED WAVEGUIDES SUN, CAITLYN MINGYUN —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18777825 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SEPARATING COMPETING ANIONS FROM PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) IN A FLOW OF WATER SPIES, BRADLEY R —
18648703 GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON (GAC) REACTIVATION WASTE PRODUCT ENHANCED ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEM FOR REMOVING PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) FROM A FLOW OF WASTEWATER AND/OR LANDFILL LEACHATE PRINCE JR, FREDDIE GARY —
18647730 SYSTEM FOR REMOVING PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) FROM A SOLUTION HAVING PFAS THEREIN USING FOAM FRACTIONATION KURTZ, BENJAMIN M —
18443736 MODIFIED MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR(MBR) SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REMOVING PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) FROM A FLOW OF WASTEWATER AND/OR LANDFILL LEACHATE PATEL, PRANAV N —
18432340 BUILDING INSULATION AND CLADDING SYSTEM FERENCE, JAMES M —
18353265 ELECTROCHEMICAL METHOD FOR FABRICATION OF HIGH-PURITY, HIGH-CONDUCTIVITY CORRUGATED WAVEGUIDES SUN, CAITLYN MINGYUN —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17772
17792
36351
17951

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18777825 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SEPARATING COMPETING ANIONS FROM PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) IN A FLOW OF WATER Emerging Compounds Treatment Technologies, Inc. SPIES, BRADLEY R 1777 §102§103Other Final Rejection — Pending Jul 19, 2024
18648703 GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON (GAC) REACTIVATION WASTE PRODUCT ENHANCED ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEM FOR REMOVING PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) FROM A FLOW OF WASTEWATER AND/OR LANDFILL LEACHATE Emerging Compounds Treatment Technologies, Inc. PRINCE JR, FREDDIE GARY 1779 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 29, 2024
18647730 SYSTEM FOR REMOVING PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) FROM A SOLUTION HAVING PFAS THEREIN USING FOAM FRACTIONATION Emerging Compounds Treatment Technologies, Inc. KURTZ, BENJAMIN M 1779 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 26, 2024
18443736 MODIFIED MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR(MBR) SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REMOVING PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) FROM A FLOW OF WASTEWATER AND/OR LANDFILL LEACHATE Emerging Compounds Treatment Technologies, Inc. PATEL, PRANAV N 1777 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 16, 2024
18432340 BUILDING INSULATION AND CLADDING SYSTEM Highland Park Technologies, LLC FERENCE, JAMES M 3635 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 05, 2024
18353265 ELECTROCHEMICAL METHOD FOR FABRICATION OF HIGH-PURITY, HIGH-CONDUCTIVITY CORRUGATED WAVEGUIDES Faraday Technology, Inc. SUN, CAITLYN MINGYUN 1795 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 17, 2023

Managing Iandiorio Teska & Coleman, LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Iandiorio Teska & Coleman, LLP's patent allowance rate?

88.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by Iandiorio Teska & Coleman, LLP were allowed, across 1,150 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Iandiorio Teska & Coleman, LLP average before allowance?

3.60 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Iandiorio Teska & Coleman, LLP have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 3 clients, before 6 examiners in 4 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month