Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Ivc Patent Agency

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 3 clients • 4 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

IVC Patent Agency specializes in Medical Devices and Mechanical Engineering, having processed 342 career applications. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 89.29 percent, showing a high level of success in obtaining grants. This is achieved with an average of 2.12 office actions per allowance, suggesting an efficient prosecution strategy.

There are currently 4 pending office actions under management. This small number of active cases contrasts with the 342 career applications, indicating a stable but currently quiet docket. The 2.12 average office actions per allowance highlights the firm's ability to reach allowances quickly while maintaining its 89.29 percent success rate.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=342 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

89.3%
Allowance Rate
n=342
+0.50σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=342
2.1
OAs to Allowance
n=275
-0.71σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=275
770 days
Time to Allowance
n=275
-3.4pp
Interview Lift
n=342
11.7%
RCE Rate
n=342
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=342

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=16 (min 20)
81.0%
§102 Overcome
n=105
87.1%
§103 Overcome
n=132
88.7%
§112 Overcome
n=97

Specialization & Scale

A61B, E21B, F41A
Top CPC Subclasses
26%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=342
0
Practitioners
n=342
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=342 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (40%)
3
Medium (60%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (20%)
§103 only1 (20%)
§102 only1 (20%)
Double-patenting + other1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KALIHER, HANS CHRISTIAN 2 62.9% +27.3%
MILLER, SERENITY A 1 68.5% +36.1%
GOMBERG, BENJAMIN S 1 67.0% +28.4%
WEISBERGER, RICHARD C 1 47.4% -4.9%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18296723 SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING THE VALUE OF EQUITY IN MULTIPLE PROPERTIES, ESTABLISHING LOAN TERMS, AND FACILITATING THE PROCESS OF A TRADE-IN MORTGAGE WEISBERGER, RICHARD C 70d overdue
18896635 LEVER-ACTION FIREARM AND KIT FOR CONSTRUCTING THE SAME GOMBERG, BENJAMIN S —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19439318 APPARATUS FOR DISPLACEMENT OF BLOOD TO MITIGATE PERIPHERAL NERVE NEUROPATHY MILLER, SERENITY A —
19053677 DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTERMITTENT DISPLACEMENT OF BLOOD TO MITIGATE PERIPHERAL NERVE NEUROPATHY KALIHER, HANS CHRISTIAN —
19054364 DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTERMITTENT DISPLACEMENT OF BLOOD TO MITIGATE PERIPHERAL NERVE NEUROPATHY KALIHER, HANS CHRISTIAN —
18896635 LEVER-ACTION FIREARM AND KIT FOR CONSTRUCTING THE SAME GOMBERG, BENJAMIN S —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37812
37711
36411
36931

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19439318 APPARATUS FOR DISPLACEMENT OF BLOOD TO MITIGATE PERIPHERAL NERVE NEUROPATHY Everett Medical Technologies LLC MILLER, SERENITY A 3771 §102DP Final Rejection — Pending Jan 03, 2026
19053677 DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTERMITTENT DISPLACEMENT OF BLOOD TO MITIGATE PERIPHERAL NERVE NEUROPATHY Everett Medical Technologies LLC KALIHER, HANS CHRISTIAN 3781 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 14, 2025
19054364 DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTERMITTENT DISPLACEMENT OF BLOOD TO MITIGATE PERIPHERAL NERVE NEUROPATHY Everett Medical Technologies LLC KALIHER, HANS CHRISTIAN 3781 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 14, 2025
18896635 LEVER-ACTION FIREARM AND KIT FOR CONSTRUCTING THE SAME Ares Defense Systems, Inc. GOMBERG, BENJAMIN S 3641 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 25, 2024
18296723 SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING THE VALUE OF EQUITY IN MULTIPLE PROPERTIES, ESTABLISHING LOAN TERMS, AND FACILITATING THE PROCESS OF A TRADE-IN MORTGAGE Calque, Inc. WEISBERGER, RICHARD C 3693 §101 Final Rejection 70d overdue Pending Apr 06, 2023

Managing Ivc Patent Agency's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Ivc Patent Agency's patent allowance rate?

89.3% of resolved applications prosecuted by Ivc Patent Agency were allowed, across 342 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Ivc Patent Agency average before allowance?

2.12 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Ivc Patent Agency have?

5 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 3 clients, before 4 examiners in 4 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month