Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Jackson Walker LLP

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

10 pending office actions • 10 clients • 10 examiners • 10 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

JACKSON WALKER LLP has 10 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. Its career record includes 1978 applications in this technology area, providing context for the reported current activity.

The resolved allowance rate is 77.79%, and the average is 3.44 office actions per allowance. These figures allow practitioners to examine historical outcomes and the action burden associated with allowance, while the pending docket identifies work still in prosecution.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1978 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

77.8%
Allowance Rate
n=1978
+0.49σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1978
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=1019
+0.03σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1019
1122 days
Time to Allowance
n=1019
+10.2pp
Interview Lift
n=1978
24.2%
RCE Rate
n=1978
1.0%
Appeal Rate
n=1978

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

82.1%
§101 Overcome
n=84
75.5%
§102 Overcome
n=400
76.8%
§103 Overcome
n=663
83.4%
§112 Overcome
n=512

Specialization & Scale

A61K, G06F, Y10T
Top CPC Subclasses
11%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1978
8
Practitioners
n=1978
247.2
Apps / Practitioner
n=1978

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (30%)
6
Medium (60%)
1
Easy (10%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (30%)
§102 only1 (10%)
§112 only1 (10%)
Double-patenting + other2 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (30%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
50% of docket
1
Information Tech
10% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MILLS, CHRISTINE M 1 62.0% +52.0%
WEBER, JONATHAN C 1 64.7% +28.3%
SHIRSAT, MARCELA 1 73.8% +18.9%
WILLIAMS, CLAYTON R 1 81.9% -4.8%
KAMM, JUDITH MARIE 1 42.9% +57.1%
HU, ANN M 1 67.8% +21.5%
CHATTIN, AMY MARIE 1 72.2% +45.7%
STEIN, MICHELLE 1 45.3% +35.5%
BAUM, ZACHARY JOHN 1 81.2% +15.2%
DEBERRY, REGINA M 1 50.2% +30.8%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18334678 SYNTHESIS OF NANO-SIZED ZEOLITES BAUM, ZACHARY JOHN 27d
19011494 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR NON-DISRUPTIVE MIGRATION OF SOFTWARE COMPONENTS TO A PUBLIC CLOUD SYSTEM WILLIAMS, CLAYTON R —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19143905 SURGICAL INSTRUMENT FOR CONDITIONING LARGE DIAMETER BURR HOLES SHIRSAT, MARCELA —
18688041 SCAFFOLD FOR SOFT TISSUE AUGMENTATION AND REINFORCEMENT HU, ANN M —
18686868 CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR (CAR) T CELL THERAPY PLATFORM CHATTIN, AMY MARIE —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18211868 METHOD FOR REMOVING ASPHALTENES, RESINS AND HEAVY METALS FROM CRUDE OIL STEIN, MICHELLE 60d overdue
18334678 SYNTHESIS OF NANO-SIZED ZEOLITES BAUM, ZACHARY JOHN 27d
19388657 Cargo Container Lock System and Method for Locking Cargo Containers MILLS, CHRISTINE M —
19354080 HANDGUN WITH IMPROVED SAFETY MECHANISM WEBER, JONATHAN C —
19143905 SURGICAL INSTRUMENT FOR CONDITIONING LARGE DIAMETER BURR HOLES SHIRSAT, MARCELA —
18984124 PHOTOACTIVATABLE NANOPARTICLES AND USES THEREOF AS AGENTS FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY COMBINATIONS KAMM, JUDITH MARIE —
18688041 SCAFFOLD FOR SOFT TISSUE AUGMENTATION AND REINFORCEMENT HU, ANN M —
18686868 CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR (CAR) T CELL THERAPY PLATFORM CHATTIN, AMY MARIE —

Client Portfolio (10 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36751
36411
37751
24431
16111
37741
16431
17711
17361
16471

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19388657 Cargo Container Lock System and Method for Locking Cargo Containers The Cargolock LLC MILLS, CHRISTINE M 3675 §103DP Final Rejection — Pending Nov 13, 2025
19354080 HANDGUN WITH IMPROVED SAFETY MECHANISM Staccato 2011, LLC WEBER, JONATHAN C 3641 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 09, 2025
19143905 SURGICAL INSTRUMENT FOR CONDITIONING LARGE DIAMETER BURR HOLES The Regents of the University of Colorado SHIRSAT, MARCELA 3775 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 27, 2025
19011494 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR NON-DISRUPTIVE MIGRATION OF SOFTWARE COMPONENTS TO A PUBLIC CLOUD SYSTEM Aviatrix Systems, Inc. WILLIAMS, CLAYTON R 2443 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Jan 06, 2025
18984124 PHOTOACTIVATABLE NANOPARTICLES AND USES THEREOF AS AGENTS FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY COMBINATIONS BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM KAMM, JUDITH MARIE 1611 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 17, 2024
18688041 SCAFFOLD FOR SOFT TISSUE AUGMENTATION AND REINFORCEMENT Smartfem Medical Technology Pty Ltd. HU, ANN M 3774 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 29, 2024
18686868 CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR (CAR) T CELL THERAPY PLATFORM The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital CHATTIN, AMY MARIE 1643 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 26, 2024
18211868 METHOD FOR REMOVING ASPHALTENES, RESINS AND HEAVY METALS FROM CRUDE OIL Rock Springs Energy Group, LLC STEIN, MICHELLE 1771 §103 Final Rejection 60d overdue Pending Jun 20, 2023
18334678 SYNTHESIS OF NANO-SIZED ZEOLITES UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON SYSTEM BAUM, ZACHARY JOHN 1736 §103 Final Rejection 27d Pending Jun 14, 2023
17925082 ADJUVANTED CONJUGATE OPIOID VACCINE Tulane University DEBERRY, REGINA M 1647 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 14, 2022

Managing Jackson Walker LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Jackson Walker LLP's patent allowance rate?

77.8% of resolved applications prosecuted by Jackson Walker LLP were allowed, across 1,978 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Jackson Walker LLP average before allowance?

3.44 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Jackson Walker LLP have?

10 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 10 clients, before 10 examiners in 10 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month