Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

K&L Gates LLP - Pittsburgh

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Computing & Software • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

5 pending office actions • 4 clients • 5 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

K&L GATES LLP-Pittsburgh focuses on Chemistry & Materials. It has 34213 career applications. The firm has a resolved allowance rate of 84.55 percent. It averages 3.82 office actions per allowance. There are 41 pending office actions.

The 84.55 percent allowance rate is based on 34213 career applications. The average of 3.82 office actions per allowance reflects the prosecution effort required in the chemistry sector. The 41 pending office actions represent the firm's current workload.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=34213 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

84.6%
Allowance Rate
n=34213
+0.65σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=34213
3.8
OAs to Allowance
n=20667
+0.03σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=20667
1082 days
Time to Allowance
n=20667
+8.9pp
Interview Lift
n=34213
32.5%
RCE Rate
n=34213
2.7%
Appeal Rate
n=34213

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

76.2%
§101 Overcome
n=2437
77.2%
§102 Overcome
n=9011
77.9%
§103 Overcome
n=15242
77.9%
§112 Overcome
n=10440

Specialization & Scale

A61K, H01M, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=34213
90
Practitioners
n=34213
380.1
Apps / Practitioner
n=34213

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (40%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
20% of docket
1
Information Tech
20% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
40% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ALEXANDER, WILLIAM R 1 87.9% +7.0%
BRYANT, MICHAEL CASEY 1 78.5% +16.9%
COOK, BRIAN S 1 62.2% +29.2%
OTERO, KENNETH MAX 1 52.4% +43.3%
BRACERO, ANDREW ANGEL 1 92.3% +20.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17663031 METHOD FOR NEURAL SIGNALS STABILIZATION BRACERO, ANDREW ANGEL 6d

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18977073 PHASE CHANGE MIRRORS ALEXANDER, WILLIAM R —
18950604 PHASE-CONTRAST ENHANCED X-RAY IMAGING SYSTEMS BRYANT, MICHAEL CASEY —
18532202 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FORMING AND DISPLAYING AN ANALYTE LOCATION MAP COOK, BRIAN S —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17663031 METHOD FOR NEURAL SIGNALS STABILIZATION BRACERO, ANDREW ANGEL 6d
18950604 PHASE-CONTRAST ENHANCED X-RAY IMAGING SYSTEMS BRYANT, MICHAEL CASEY —
18532202 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FORMING AND DISPLAYING AN ANALYTE LOCATION MAP COOK, BRIAN S —
18322845 VESSEL FOR A FUEL CELL, A FUEL CELL SYSTEM, AND A METHOD FOR MAINTAINING A NON-EXPLOSIVE ATMOSPHERE IN A VESSEL FOR A FUEL CELL OTERO, KENNETH MAX —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28842
17251
21261

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18977073 PHASE CHANGE MIRRORS Teledyne Scientific & Imaging, LLC ALEXANDER, WILLIAM R §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 11, 2024
18950604 PHASE-CONTRAST ENHANCED X-RAY IMAGING SYSTEMS Teledyne Dalsa B.V. BRYANT, MICHAEL CASEY 2884 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 18, 2024
18532202 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FORMING AND DISPLAYING AN ANALYTE LOCATION MAP Teledyne Flir Defense, Inc. COOK, BRIAN S 2884 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 07, 2023
18322845 VESSEL FOR A FUEL CELL, A FUEL CELL SYSTEM, AND A METHOD FOR MAINTAINING A NON-EXPLOSIVE ATMOSPHERE IN A VESSEL FOR A FUEL CELL Teledyne Energy Systems, Inc. OTERO, KENNETH MAX 1725 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 24, 2023
17663031 METHOD FOR NEURAL SIGNALS STABILIZATION Teledyne Scientific & Imaging, LLC BRACERO, ANDREW ANGEL 2126 §103 Final Rejection 6d Pending May 12, 2022

Managing K&L Gates LLP - Pittsburgh's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month