Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
6 pending office actions • 6 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Kearney McWilliams & Davis, PLLC has 6 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The firm has a history of 929 career applications. Its resolved allowance rate pct is 86.02, indicating a strong track record of successful outcomes. This 86.02 rate provides a reliable expectation for patent applicants in the mechanical systems sector.
The avg office actions per allowance is 3.5. This 3.5 figure serves as a performance indicator for the prosecution cycle. With 6 pending office actions and an 86.02 resolved allowance rate pct, the firm demonstrates consistent performance in mechanical and transportation patenting. The 3.5 average office actions per allowance helps practitioners estimate the resources required for each application among the 929 career applications. The firm's 86.02 resolved allowance rate pct highlights its consistent ability to achieve positive outcomes.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (17%) |
| §103 only | 1 (17%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 2 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEFF, ANGELA MARIE DITRAN | 1 | 69.7% | +13.2% |
| YU, ARIEL J | 1 | 40.6% | +26.7% |
| CERLANEK, ADAM JOEL | 1 | 69.0% | +35.5% |
| ASQIRIBA, KARIM | 1 | 57.5% | +46.8% |
| LAU, MICHAEL J | 1 | 72.3% | +23.2% |
| KHATTAR, RAJESH | 1 | 36.9% | +35.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18747990 | COMMUNICATIONS TRAFFIC MANAGER | CERLANEK, ADAM JOEL | — |
| 18588704 | EASY RELEASE BUNDLER | ASQIRIBA, KARIM | — |
| 16868694 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING DISTRIBUTED OWNERSHIP OF TANGIBLE ASSETS | KHATTAR, RAJESH | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19376243 | METHOD OF USING TRACERS FOR PROVIDING A DATA SET RELATED TO WELLBORE PERFORMANCE | LEFF, ANGELA MARIE DITRAN | — |
| 19233085 | INTERACTIVE SHOPPING SYSTEM AND METHOD | YU, ARIEL J | — |
| 18747990 | COMMUNICATIONS TRAFFIC MANAGER | CERLANEK, ADAM JOEL | — |
| 18588704 | EASY RELEASE BUNDLER | ASQIRIBA, KARIM | — |
| 18497264 | METHOD FOR SCREENING OF MOVEMENT DISORDERS | LAU, MICHAEL J | — |
| 16868694 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING DISTRIBUTED OWNERSHIP OF TANGIBLE ASSETS | KHATTAR, RAJESH | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Talgat Shokanov | 1 |
| Swiftgo, Inc. | 1 |
| Dj Inventions, LLC | 1 |
| Designer Orange, LLC | 1 |
| Movalytix, Inc. | 1 |
| Nestmarket Inc. | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3674 | 1 |
| 3627 | 1 |
| 2478 | 1 |
| 3772 | 1 |
| 3796 | 1 |
| 3684 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19376243 | METHOD OF USING TRACERS FOR PROVIDING A DATA SET RELATED TO WELLBORE PERFORMANCE | Talgat Shokanov | LEFF, ANGELA MARIE DITRAN | 3674 | §103§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 31, 2025 |
| 19233085 | INTERACTIVE SHOPPING SYSTEM AND METHOD | Swiftgo, Inc. | YU, ARIEL J | 3627 | §112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 10, 2025 |
| 18747990 | COMMUNICATIONS TRAFFIC MANAGER | Dj Inventions, LLC | CERLANEK, ADAM JOEL | 2478 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 19, 2024 |
| 18588704 | EASY RELEASE BUNDLER | Designer Orange, LLC | ASQIRIBA, KARIM | 3772 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Feb 27, 2024 |
| 18497264 | METHOD FOR SCREENING OF MOVEMENT DISORDERS | Movalytix, Inc. | LAU, MICHAEL J | 3796 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 30, 2023 |
| 16868694 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING DISTRIBUTED OWNERSHIP OF TANGIBLE ASSETS | Nestmarket Inc. | KHATTAR, RAJESH | 3684 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 07, 2020 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial86.0% of resolved applications prosecuted by Kearney Mcwilliams & Davis, Pllc were allowed, across 929 applications in USPTO records.
3.50 office actions per allowed application on average.
6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 6 clients, before 6 examiners in 6 art units.
