Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026

Kerr Ip Group, LLC

8 pending office actions • 5 clients • 7 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days

Quality Metrics (n=493 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

90.2%
Allowance Rate
n=493
+0.62σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=493
4.1
OAs to Allowance
n=286
+0.27σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=286
1229 days
Time to Allowance
n=286
+11.3pp
Interview Lift
n=493
40.7%
RCE Rate
n=493
0.7%
Appeal Rate
n=493

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

93.6%
§101 Overcome
n=31
83.3%
§102 Overcome
n=30
91.5%
§103 Overcome
n=176
100.0%
§112 Overcome
n=27

Specialization & Scale

G07F, G06Q, H04W
Top CPC Subclasses
31%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=493
1
Practitioners
n=493
493.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=493

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (12%)
5
Medium (62%)
1
Easy (12%)
1
Unknown (12%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (12%)
§103 only3 (38%)
§102 only2 (25%)
Double-patenting only1 (12%)
No statute on record1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
25% of docket
1
Information Tech
12% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
62% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SMITH-STEWART, DEMETRA R 2 89.9% +8.3%
CHANG, KENNETH W 1 86.4% +1.4%
TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V 1 55.3% +46.2%
HUI, SAN MING R 1 59.2% +19.9%
CUFF, MICHAEL A 1 82.2% +12.5%
LEICHLITER, CHASE E 1 64.3% +23.1%
CHAN, ALLEN 1 69.9% +35.6%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18797321 ROW-BASED WORLD MODEL FOR PERCEPTIVE NAVIGATION SMITH-STEWART, DEMETRA R 147d overdue
18797330 GENERATING A MISSION PLAN WITH A ROW-BASED WORLD MODEL SMITH-STEWART, DEMETRA R 147d overdue

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19043171 ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GAMING OR AMUSEMENT CREDIT PURCHASES CUFF, MICHAEL A

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18764941 Electronic Pull-tab System And Method For Modifiable Paytables CHAN, ALLEN 19d
18764851 Overlaid Feature Electronic Pull-tab System And Method LEICHLITER, CHASE E 84d
19059219 MICROSPHERE PRODUCTION METHOD TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V
19059201 HORMONE REPLENISHMENT METHOD WITH A HYDROGEL POLYMER HUI, SAN MING R
19043171 ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GAMING OR AMUSEMENT CREDIT PURCHASES CUFF, MICHAEL A

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37153
36612
24381
16151
16271

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19066073 NETWORK BASED HYPERLOCAL AUTHENTICATION Loyalty Iot, Inc. CHANG, KENNETH W 2438 Non-Final OA Pending Feb 27, 2025
19059219 MICROSPHERE PRODUCTION METHOD VITALTE LIFESCIENCES INC. TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V 1615 §103 Final Rejection Pending Feb 20, 2025
19059201 HORMONE REPLENISHMENT METHOD WITH A HYDROGEL POLYMER VITALTE LIFESCIENCES INC. HUI, SAN MING R 1627 DP Final Rejection Pending Feb 20, 2025
19043171 ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GAMING OR AMUSEMENT CREDIT PURCHASES Automated Cashless Systems, Inc. CUFF, MICHAEL A 3715 §101 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 31, 2025
18797321 ROW-BASED WORLD MODEL FOR PERCEPTIVE NAVIGATION Farmx Inc. SMITH-STEWART, DEMETRA R 3661 §102 Non-Final OA 147d overdue Pending Aug 07, 2024
18797330 GENERATING A MISSION PLAN WITH A ROW-BASED WORLD MODEL Farmx Inc. SMITH-STEWART, DEMETRA R 3661 §102 Non-Final OA 147d overdue Pending Aug 07, 2024
18764851 Overlaid Feature Electronic Pull-tab System And Method Pilot Gaming Systems, Inc. LEICHLITER, CHASE E 3715 §103 Non-Final OA 84d Pending Jul 05, 2024
18764941 Electronic Pull-tab System And Method For Modifiable Paytables Pilot Gaming Systems, Inc. CHAN, ALLEN 3715 §103 Non-Final OA 19d Pending Jul 05, 2024

Managing Kerr Ip Group, LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month