Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Kleinberg & Lerner, LLP

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 1 client • 3 examiners • 2 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

KLEINBERG & LERNER, LLP focuses on Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering, with 1032 career applications. The firm has a resolved allowance rate pct of 93.62. There are 5 pending office actions currently in the docket. The 93.62 resolved allowance rate pct reflects the success rate for the 1032 applications the firm has handled. The 5 pending office actions are fewer than the career applications.

The avg office actions per allowance is 1.01. This metric shows the average number of office actions the firm receives before an application is allowed. The 1.01 avg office actions per allowance suggests that the firm often secures an allowance with minimal interactions. This efficiency, combined with the 93.62 resolved allowance rate pct, makes its prosecution profile in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering distinctive. Practitioners can use these figures to understand the typical path to allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1032 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

93.6%
Allowance Rate
n=1032
+0.24σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1032
1.0
OAs to Allowance
n=851
-1.70σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=851
466 days
Time to Allowance
n=851
-3.7pp
Interview Lift
n=1032
4.1%
RCE Rate
n=1032
0.8%
Appeal Rate
n=1032

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

80.0%
§101 Overcome
n=20
76.1%
§102 Overcome
n=92
83.2%
§103 Overcome
n=131
90.1%
§112 Overcome
n=181

Specialization & Scale

A43B, B29D, H02J
Top CPC Subclasses
22%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1032
3
Practitioners
n=1032
344.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1032

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
0
Medium (0%)
4
Easy (80%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (20%)
Double-patenting only3 (60%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
4
Business / Other
80% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NELSON, THORNTON C 3 95.4% +4.8%
BAYS, MARIE D 1 74.5% +19.5%
BROWN-LORRIG, CHRISTEN PILAR 1 100.0% +0.0%

Quick Wins (4)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
29963853 SHOE SOLE NELSON, THORNTON C 15d
29963339 SHOE SOLE NELSON, THORNTON C 15d
29963004 SHOE SOLE NELSON, THORNTON C 15d
29960071 SHOE BROWN-LORRIG, CHRISTEN PILAR —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19353548 FOOTWEAR STRAP AND FOOTWEAR HAVING THE SAME BAYS, MARIE D —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19353548 FOOTWEAR STRAP AND FOOTWEAR HAVING THE SAME BAYS, MARIE D —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II 5

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
29124
37321

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19353548 FOOTWEAR STRAP AND FOOTWEAR HAVING THE SAME Skechers U.S.A., Inc. Ii BAYS, MARIE D 3732 §102§112Other Final Rejection — Pending Oct 08, 2025
29963853 SHOE SOLE Skechers U.S.A., Inc. Ii NELSON, THORNTON C 2912 DP Final Rejection 15d Pending Sep 19, 2024
29963339 SHOE SOLE Skechers U.S.A., Inc. Ii NELSON, THORNTON C 2912 DP Final Rejection 15d Pending Sep 16, 2024
29963004 SHOE SOLE Skechers U.S.A., Inc. Ii NELSON, THORNTON C 2912 DP Final Rejection 15d Pending Sep 13, 2024
29960071 SHOE Skechers U.S.A., Inc. Ii BROWN-LORRIG, CHRISTEN PILAR 2912 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 28, 2024

Managing Kleinberg & Lerner, LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month