Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Law Office Of Paul B. Johnson

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 5 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Law Office of Paul B. Johnson has 6 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and 145 career applications. The profile shows a current examination workload supported by a smaller historical application record in the same technology area.

The resolved allowance rate is 81.48%, and the average is 2.27 office actions per allowance. The rate describes resolved outcomes, while the average describes examination activity associated with allowed matters. Together, they provide useful historical context for response planning without establishing a result for any particular pending application.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=145 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

81.5%
Allowance Rate
n=145
+0.50σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=145
2.3
OAs to Allowance
n=66
-0.47σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=66
727 days
Time to Allowance
n=66
+13.7pp
Interview Lift
n=145
12.4%
RCE Rate
n=145
4.2%
Appeal Rate
n=145

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=6 (min 20)
67.6%
§102 Overcome
n=34
62.5%
§103 Overcome
n=56
69.0%
§112 Overcome
n=42

Specialization & Scale

G06F, A44C, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
16%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=145
1
Practitioners
n=145
145.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=145

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (83%)
1
Medium (17%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (17%)
§103 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
17% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
83% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HOLTZCLAW, MICHAEL T. 1 78.0% +15.5%
MCNURLEN, SCOTT THOMAS 1 52.7% +27.6%
FORDJOUR, SARAH AKYAA 1 51.4% +23.2%
QURESHI, MOHAMMED AHMED 1 83.3% +13.1%
KOSANOVIC, HELENA 1 44.9% +14.3%
HODGE, LAURA NICOLE 1 49.2% +40.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18896581 Motors and Related Methods of Manufacture and Use QURESHI, MOHAMMED AHMED —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18274921 MULTI-SENSOR WEARABLE PATCH HODGE, LAURA NICOLE 125d overdue
19048220 SMART PATCH FOR MONITORING HEALTH METRICS HOLTZCLAW, MICHAEL T. —
19020220 Locking Carrying Devices and Related Assemblies and Methods MCNURLEN, SCOTT THOMAS —
18951414 Drain Cleaners and Related Systems and Methods FORDJOUR, SARAH AKYAA —
18676898 Candles and Related Components and Methods KOSANOVIC, HELENA —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18274921 MULTI-SENSOR WEARABLE PATCH HODGE, LAURA NICOLE 125d overdue
19048220 SMART PATCH FOR MONITORING HEALTH METRICS HOLTZCLAW, MICHAEL T. —
19020220 Locking Carrying Devices and Related Assemblies and Methods MCNURLEN, SCOTT THOMAS —
18951414 Drain Cleaners and Related Systems and Methods FORDJOUR, SARAH AKYAA —
18896581 Motors and Related Methods of Manufacture and Use QURESHI, MOHAMMED AHMED —
18676898 Candles and Related Components and Methods KOSANOVIC, HELENA —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37961
37341
37231
28341
37621
37921

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19048220 SMART PATCH FOR MONITORING HEALTH METRICS Biotricity Inc. HOLTZCLAW, MICHAEL T. 3796 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 07, 2025
19020220 Locking Carrying Devices and Related Assemblies and Methods Hukr LLC MCNURLEN, SCOTT THOMAS 3734 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 14, 2025
18951414 Drain Cleaners and Related Systems and Methods Hazar Enterprises LLC FORDJOUR, SARAH AKYAA 3723 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 18, 2024
18896581 Motors and Related Methods of Manufacture and Use Ye Olde Robotics Company LLC QURESHI, MOHAMMED AHMED 2834 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 25, 2024
18676898 Candles and Related Components and Methods Firefly Innovations LLC KOSANOVIC, HELENA 3762 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 29, 2024
18274921 MULTI-SENSOR WEARABLE PATCH Biotricity Inc. HODGE, LAURA NICOLE 3792 §101§103 Non-Final OA 125d overdue Pending Jul 28, 2023

Managing Law Office Of Paul B. Johnson's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Law Office Of Paul B. Johnson's patent allowance rate?

81.5% of resolved applications prosecuted by Law Office Of Paul B. Johnson were allowed, across 145 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Law Office Of Paul B. Johnson average before allowance?

2.27 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Law Office Of Paul B. Johnson have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 6 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month