Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Leonardpatel Pc

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

7 pending office actions • 2 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

LeonardPatel PC handles 679 career applications in Computing & Software and has 8 pending office actions. Its prosecution record shows a 92.94% resolved allowance rate, indicating that most resolved matters in the reported set reached allowance.

The average is 3.51 office actions per allowance. That measure provides useful planning context: allowed matters have generally required multiple office-action exchanges, so practitioners should account for continued prosecution work even where the overall resolved allowance rate is high.

The combination of a substantial application history, a limited current pending-action figure, and the reported outcomes supports a review focused on individual unresolved matters and the claim amendments associated with allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=679 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

92.9%
Allowance Rate
n=679
+0.61σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=679
3.5
OAs to Allowance
n=461
-0.10σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=461
907 days
Time to Allowance
n=461
+3.8pp
Interview Lift
n=679
26.4%
RCE Rate
n=679
8.3%
Appeal Rate
n=679

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

79.6%
§101 Overcome
n=108
85.1%
§102 Overcome
n=195
87.0%
§103 Overcome
n=345
82.6%
§112 Overcome
n=201

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G06N, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
38%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=679
1
Practitioners
n=679
679.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=679

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (71%)
2
Medium (29%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other4 (57%)
§102 only2 (29%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
4
Information Tech
57% of docket
1
Communications
14% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
29% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BLAUFELD, JUSTIN R 2 47.5% +30.1%
VISCARRA, RICARDO I 1 65.2% +18.9%
VO, HUYEN X 1 83.4% +19.9%
ST LEGER, GEOFFREY R 1 82.7% +20.9%
OBAID, FATEH M 1 68.0% +35.3%
BHAT, VIBHA NARAYAN 1 — —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19307558 AUTOMATIC ACTIVATION AND CONFIGURATION OF ROBOTIC PROCESS AUTOMATION WORKFLOWS USING MACHINE LEARNING VISCARRA, RICARDO I —
18977757 SCHEDULER VO, HUYEN X —
18904800 APPLICATION TEMPLATE GENERATION ST LEGER, GEOFFREY R —
18816026 DIGITAL ASSISTANT USING ROBOTIC PROCESS AUTOMATION OBAID, FATEH M —
18191602 AUTOMATED GROUP OF ASSOCIATED ALERTS BHAT, VIBHA NARAYAN —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17693791 GRAPHICAL ELEMENT DETECTION USING A COMBINATION OF USER INTERFACE DESCRIPTOR ATTRIBUTES FROM TWO OR MORE GRAPHICAL ELEMENT DETECTION TECHNIQUES BLAUFELD, JUSTIN R 86d
19307558 AUTOMATIC ACTIVATION AND CONFIGURATION OF ROBOTIC PROCESS AUTOMATION WORKFLOWS USING MACHINE LEARNING VISCARRA, RICARDO I —
18977757 SCHEDULER VO, HUYEN X —
18904800 APPLICATION TEMPLATE GENERATION ST LEGER, GEOFFREY R —
18816026 DIGITAL ASSISTANT USING ROBOTIC PROCESS AUTOMATION OBAID, FATEH M —
17693943 GRAPHICAL ELEMENT DETECTION USING A COMBINATION OF USER INTERFACE DESCRIPTOR ATTRIBUTES FROM TWO OR MORE GRAPHICAL ELEMENT DETECTION TECHNIQUES BLAUFELD, JUSTIN R —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
UIPATH, INC. 5
Freshworks 2

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
21512
36571
26561
21921
36271
21421

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19307558 AUTOMATIC ACTIVATION AND CONFIGURATION OF ROBOTIC PROCESS AUTOMATION WORKFLOWS USING MACHINE LEARNING UIPATH, INC. VISCARRA, RICARDO I 3657 §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 22, 2025
18977757 SCHEDULER UIPATH, INC. VO, HUYEN X 2656 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 11, 2024
18904800 APPLICATION TEMPLATE GENERATION Freshworks Inc. ST LEGER, GEOFFREY R 2192 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 02, 2024
18816026 DIGITAL ASSISTANT USING ROBOTIC PROCESS AUTOMATION UIPATH, INC. OBAID, FATEH M 3627 §101§102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 27, 2024
18191602 AUTOMATED GROUP OF ASSOCIATED ALERTS Freshworks Inc. BHAT, VIBHA NARAYAN 2142 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 28, 2023
17693791 GRAPHICAL ELEMENT DETECTION USING A COMBINATION OF USER INTERFACE DESCRIPTOR ATTRIBUTES FROM TWO OR MORE GRAPHICAL ELEMENT DETECTION TECHNIQUES UIPATH, INC. BLAUFELD, JUSTIN R 2151 §102 Final Rejection 86d Pending Mar 14, 2022
17693943 GRAPHICAL ELEMENT DETECTION USING A COMBINATION OF USER INTERFACE DESCRIPTOR ATTRIBUTES FROM TWO OR MORE GRAPHICAL ELEMENT DETECTION TECHNIQUES UIPATH, INC. BLAUFELD, JUSTIN R 2151 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 14, 2022

Managing Leonardpatel Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Leonardpatel Pc's patent allowance rate?

92.9% of resolved applications prosecuted by Leonardpatel Pc were allowed, across 679 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Leonardpatel Pc average before allowance?

3.51 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Leonardpatel Pc have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 2 clients, before 6 examiners in 6 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month