Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

12 pending office actions • 9 clients • 10 examiners • 10 art units • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

LEWIS, BRISBOIS, BISGAARD & SMITH LLP has 665 career applications in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and 12 pending office actions. The profile combines a defined prosecution history with a limited current group of matters requiring attention.

The resolved allowance rate is 76.91%, and the average is 2.85 office actions per allowance. The allowance figure describes resolved outcomes, while the action average indicates the examination activity associated with allowed matters.

Practitioners can use the pending docket to organize immediate work and the historical measures to assess prosecution experience in this technology area. Application-specific records are needed to understand the issues behind individual outcomes.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=665 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

76.9%
Allowance Rate
n=665
+0.44σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=665
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=353
-0.36σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=353
1004 days
Time to Allowance
n=353
+17.4pp
Interview Lift
n=665
15.5%
RCE Rate
n=665
1.4%
Appeal Rate
n=665

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

52.6%
§101 Overcome
n=57
70.1%
§102 Overcome
n=147
69.1%
§103 Overcome
n=243
71.3%
§112 Overcome
n=181

Specialization & Scale

A61B, G06F, A61C
Top CPC Subclasses
11%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=665
0
Practitioners
n=665
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=665 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

10
Hard (83%)
2
Medium (17%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (8%)
§101 + other5 (42%)
§103 only2 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
8% of docket
1
Semiconductors
8% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FELTON, AILEEN BAKER 2 51.7% +16.7%
BAKSHI, PANCHAM 2 76.7% +30.2%
PHAN, NICHOLAS K 1 52.1% +19.6%
CRUM, JACOB R 1 74.6% +28.2%
PATEL, PINALBEN V 1 89.1% +9.7%
UTAMA, ROBERT J 1 60.2% +29.6%
BUCKLE JR, JAMES J 1 65.6% +14.9%
HALL, DEANNA K 1 75.7% +15.3%
LANNU, JOSHUA DARYL DEANON 1 82.2% +24.1%
OLIVER, BRADLEY S 1 61.0% +14.4%

Hard Cases (10)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18702776 BREATH-POWERED NASAL DEVICES FOR TREATMENT OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI), INCLUDING CONCUSSION, AND METHODS HALL, DEANNA K 215d overdue
19481811 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PASSIVE VIEWER ENGAGEMENT AND VERIFIABLE CONTENT INTERACTION PHAN, NICHOLAS K —
18868075 COMPOSITE POWDER CONTAINING PRIMARY NANOPARTICLES OF ALUMINUM OR ALUMINUM OXIDE FELTON, AILEEN BAKER —
18863137 A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COOLING INDIVIDUAL SERVERS WITHIN A SERVER CABINET CRUM, JACOB R —
18807551 DENTAL SYSTEM AND METHOD PATEL, PINALBEN V —
18782173 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING A STUDENT'S READING SKILLS UTAMA, ROBERT J —
18653138 C-20 STEROID COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS AND USES THEREOF TO TREAT TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI), INCLUDING CONCUSSIONS BAKSHI, PANCHAM —
18640093 CARBON REDUCING CURTAIN WALL STRUCTURE BUCKLE JR, JAMES J —

Interview Candidates (11)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18702776 BREATH-POWERED NASAL DEVICES FOR TREATMENT OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI), INCLUDING CONCUSSION, AND METHODS HALL, DEANNA K 215d overdue
17548356 APPARATUS FOR APPLYING A CONSUMABLE PREPARATION OLIVER, BRADLEY S 87d overdue
19481811 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PASSIVE VIEWER ENGAGEMENT AND VERIFIABLE CONTENT INTERACTION PHAN, NICHOLAS K —
18868075 COMPOSITE POWDER CONTAINING PRIMARY NANOPARTICLES OF ALUMINUM OR ALUMINUM OXIDE FELTON, AILEEN BAKER —
18863137 A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COOLING INDIVIDUAL SERVERS WITHIN A SERVER CABINET CRUM, JACOB R —
18782173 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING A STUDENT'S READING SKILLS UTAMA, ROBERT J —
18653138 C-20 STEROID COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS AND USES THEREOF TO TREAT TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI), INCLUDING CONCUSSIONS BAKSHI, PANCHAM —
18640093 CARBON REDUCING CURTAIN WALL STRUCTURE BUCKLE JR, JAMES J —

Client Portfolio (9 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17342
16232
36991
28411
26731
37151
36331
37831
37911
37541

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19481811 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PASSIVE VIEWER ENGAGEMENT AND VERIFIABLE CONTENT INTERACTION The Feature, Inc. PHAN, NICHOLAS K 3699 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 05, 2025
18868075 COMPOSITE POWDER CONTAINING PRIMARY NANOPARTICLES OF ALUMINUM OR ALUMINUM OXIDE Helicon Chemical Company FELTON, AILEEN BAKER 1734 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 21, 2024
18863137 A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COOLING INDIVIDUAL SERVERS WITHIN A SERVER CABINET Liberation Technology Services, Inc. CRUM, JACOB R 2841 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 05, 2024
18807551 DENTAL SYSTEM AND METHOD Biolase Mg LLC PATEL, PINALBEN V 2673 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 16, 2024
18782173 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING A STUDENT'S READING SKILLS Objective Ed, Inc. UTAMA, ROBERT J 3715 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 24, 2024
18653138 C-20 STEROID COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS AND USES THEREOF TO TREAT TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI), INCLUDING CONCUSSIONS Oragenics, Inc. BAKSHI, PANCHAM 1623 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 02, 2024
18640093 CARBON REDUCING CURTAIN WALL STRUCTURE Net Zero Envelope, Inc. BUCKLE JR, JAMES J 3633 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 19, 2024
18702776 BREATH-POWERED NASAL DEVICES FOR TREATMENT OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI), INCLUDING CONCUSSION, AND METHODS Oragenics, Inc. HALL, DEANNA K 3783 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA 215d overdue Pending Apr 18, 2024
18681144 Locomotion-Assisting Method and Apparatus Gaitar Limited LANNU, JOSHUA DARYL DEANON 3791 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 05, 2024
17740520 TRI-REGIME COMPOSITE SOLID PROPELLANT Helicon Chemical Company FELTON, AILEEN BAKER 1734 §101§102§112 Final Rejection — Pending May 10, 2022
17548356 APPARATUS FOR APPLYING A CONSUMABLE PREPARATION VIJU BEAUTY LLC OLIVER, BRADLEY S 3754 §103 Final Rejection 87d overdue Pending Dec 10, 2021
14857331 C-20 STEROID COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS AND USES THEREOF TO TREAT TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI), INCLUDING CONCUSSIONS Oragenics, Inc. BAKSHI, PANCHAM 1623 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 17, 2015

Managing Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP's patent allowance rate?

76.9% of resolved applications prosecuted by Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP were allowed, across 665 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP average before allowance?

2.85 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP have?

12 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 9 clients, before 10 examiners in 10 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month