Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Macmillan, Sobanksi & Todd, LLC - Cook Medical

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

13 pending office actions • 3 clients • 12 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

MacMillan, Sobanksi & Todd, LLC - Cook Medical has a record of 397 career applications within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The firm has established a resolved allowance rate of 84.34 percent, which is a key indicator of its performance in obtaining patent grants. This rate reflects the firm's effectiveness in navigating the examination process.

The prosecution cycle at the firm involves an average of 4.7 office actions per allowance. This metric suggests a detailed level of interaction with examiners to overcome rejections or requirements. At present, the firm is responsible for 13 pending office actions that are awaiting resolution.

With 397 career applications and an 84.34 percent resolved allowance rate, the firm demonstrates specialized experience in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The 4.7 average office actions per allowance serves as a predictive figure for the intensity of the prosecution process. These statistics offer a clear view of the firm's historical and current workload.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=397 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

84.3%
Allowance Rate
n=397
+0.56σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=397
4.7
OAs to Allowance
n=210
+0.42σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=210
1288 days
Time to Allowance
n=210
+6.4pp
Interview Lift
n=397
41.0%
RCE Rate
n=397
1.9%
Appeal Rate
n=397

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=4 (min 20)
80.3%
§102 Overcome
n=127
78.2%
§103 Overcome
n=197
80.5%
§112 Overcome
n=87

Specialization & Scale

A61F, A61B, A61M
Top CPC Subclasses
81%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=397
0
Practitioners
n=397
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=397 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (38%)
7
Medium (54%)
1
Easy (8%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (31%)
§102 only1 (8%)
Double-patenting only1 (8%)
Double-patenting + other2 (15%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (38%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
12
Mechanical / Eng
92% of docket
1
Business / Other
8% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB 2 62.2% +23.6%
DANG, PHONG SON H 1 78.0% +24.4%
LANGHALS, RENEE C 1 58.6% +42.7%
WILLIAMS, CATHERINE SERKE 1 63.0% +29.1%
COCHRAN, KARI LEE 1 100.0% +0.0%
PELLEGRINO, BRIAN E 1 55.4% +35.9%
KHANDKER, RAIHAN R 1 64.4% +55.6%
TURKOWSKI, KAYLA MARIE 1 67.9% +50.4%
SHARMA, YASHITA 1 81.7% +24.9%
FANG, MICHAEL YIMING 1 62.1% +36.7%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18827361 CONSTRAINT ARRANGEMENT FOR A STENT-GRAFT LOADED ONTO A DELIVERY SYSTEM COCHRAN, KARI LEE —
18529664 DELIVERY SYSTEM WITH GUIDED RETRACTION MECHANISM OF A DELIVERY SYSTEM TIP SHARMA, YASHITA —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19262801 Medical Cannulae, Delivery Systems and Methods DANG, PHONG SON H —
18890385 PROSTHESIS WITH SIDE BRANCH AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME WILLIAMS, CATHERINE SERKE —
18613673 MEDICAL DEVICE SYSTEM ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB —
18540174 DELIVERY DEVICE WITH AN ACTUATOR HAVING A HARD STOP AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS KHANDKER, RAIHAN R —
18538827 INTRODUCER ASSEMBLY HAVING A LOW-PROFILE ACCESS SHEATH AND A HUB ASSEMBLY TURKOWSKI, KAYLA MARIE —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18106601 Medical Systems, Devices, and Kits Useful in Performing Treatment under Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Related Methods FANG, MICHAEL YIMING 49d overdue
17558905 IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE INCLUDING VALVE MEMBER ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB 16d
19262801 Medical Cannulae, Delivery Systems and Methods DANG, PHONG SON H —
19027914 Access Devices, Treatment Devices, and Kits Useful for Performing Treatment under Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Related Methods LANGHALS, RENEE C —
18890385 PROSTHESIS WITH SIDE BRANCH AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME WILLIAMS, CATHERINE SERKE —
18775680 METHODS AND USES OF BIOLOGICAL TISSUES FOR VARIOUS STENT AND OTHER MEDICAL APPLICATIONS PELLEGRINO, BRIAN E —
18613673 MEDICAL DEVICE SYSTEM ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB —
18540174 DELIVERY DEVICE WITH AN ACTUATOR HAVING A HARD STOP AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS KHANDKER, RAIHAN R —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Cook Medical 10
Cook Group 2
CVDevices 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37746
37712
37971
39931
37991
37831
37981

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19262801 Medical Cannulae, Delivery Systems and Methods Cook Medical Technologies LLC DANG, PHONG SON H 3771 §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 08, 2025
19027914 Access Devices, Treatment Devices, and Kits Useful for Performing Treatment under Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Related Methods Muffin Incorporated Dba Cook Advanced Technologies LANGHALS, RENEE C 3797 §103§112DP Final Rejection — Pending Jan 17, 2025
18890385 PROSTHESIS WITH SIDE BRANCH AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME Cook Medical Technologies LLC WILLIAMS, CATHERINE SERKE 3993 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 19, 2024
18827361 CONSTRAINT ARRANGEMENT FOR A STENT-GRAFT LOADED ONTO A DELIVERY SYSTEM Cook Medical Technologies LLC COCHRAN, KARI LEE 3774 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 06, 2024
18775680 METHODS AND USES OF BIOLOGICAL TISSUES FOR VARIOUS STENT AND OTHER MEDICAL APPLICATIONS Cvdevices, LLC PELLEGRINO, BRIAN E 3799 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 17, 2024
18613673 MEDICAL DEVICE SYSTEM Cook Medical Technologies LLC ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB 3774 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 22, 2024
18540174 DELIVERY DEVICE WITH AN ACTUATOR HAVING A HARD STOP AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS Cook Medical Technologies LLC KHANDKER, RAIHAN R 3771 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 14, 2023
18538827 INTRODUCER ASSEMBLY HAVING A LOW-PROFILE ACCESS SHEATH AND A HUB ASSEMBLY Cook Medical Technologies LLC TURKOWSKI, KAYLA MARIE 3783 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 13, 2023
18529664 DELIVERY SYSTEM WITH GUIDED RETRACTION MECHANISM OF A DELIVERY SYSTEM TIP Cook Medical Technologies LLC SHARMA, YASHITA 3774 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2023
18106601 Medical Systems, Devices, and Kits Useful in Performing Treatment under Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Related Methods Muffin Incorporated Dba Cook Advanced Technologies FANG, MICHAEL YIMING 3798 §103 Final Rejection 49d overdue Pending Feb 07, 2023
18066698 ENDOGRAFT SYSTEM HAVING A DEPLOYMENT DEVICE AND A STENT-GRAFT ASSEMBLY Cook Medical Technologies LLC WOZNICKI, JACQUELINE 3774 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 15, 2022
17943867 MODULAR HANDLE FOR A PROSTHESIS DELIVERY DEVICE Cook Medical Technologies LLC MANNAN, MIKAIL A 3774 §102 Final Rejection 19d Pending Sep 13, 2022
17558905 IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE INCLUDING VALVE MEMBER Cook Medical Technologies LLC ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB 3774 §102§103DP Final Rejection 16d Pending Dec 22, 2021

Managing Macmillan, Sobanksi & Todd, LLC - Cook Medical's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Macmillan, Sobanksi & Todd, LLC - Cook Medical's patent allowance rate?

84.3% of resolved applications prosecuted by Macmillan, Sobanksi & Todd, LLC - Cook Medical were allowed, across 397 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Macmillan, Sobanksi & Todd, LLC - Cook Medical average before allowance?

4.70 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Macmillan, Sobanksi & Todd, LLC - Cook Medical have?

13 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 3 clients, before 12 examiners in 7 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month